A link criticality approach for pedestrian network design to promote walking

IF 9.1 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES npj urban sustainability Pub Date : 2023-08-19 DOI:10.1038/s42949-023-00114-z
Rajat Verma, Satish V. Ukkusuri
{"title":"A link criticality approach for pedestrian network design to promote walking","authors":"Rajat Verma, Satish V. Ukkusuri","doi":"10.1038/s42949-023-00114-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Measures of walkability generally do not provide a detailed quantitative assessment of pedestrian infrastructure development prioritization. In this study, a link-based composite measure of walkability and walking is introduced to overcome this limitation. This measure, called ‘pednet score’, is based on a weighted pedestrian network (‘pednet’) made of sidewalks and crosswalks whose edge weights are descriptive of their popularity. Edge popularity is derived from home-based walk trip assignments derived from simulated pedestrian demand. Properties of the pednet score are studied using three hypothetical variants of the pednet in three North American cities, each involving the addition of candidate sidewalk and/or crosswalk segments. It is shown that a strategic selection of these segments based on pednet score can substantially increase walking trips, in some cases up to 236%, and reduce current mean pedestrian trip distances by up to 340 m. A mixed development approach involving both sidewalks and crosswalks also shows considerably higher improvement than those segments considered alone. Results from marginal benefit curves strongly indicate the utility of the pednet score as a measure of link criticality for segment prioritization in pedestrian network design.","PeriodicalId":74322,"journal":{"name":"npj urban sustainability","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s42949-023-00114-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj urban sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s42949-023-00114-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measures of walkability generally do not provide a detailed quantitative assessment of pedestrian infrastructure development prioritization. In this study, a link-based composite measure of walkability and walking is introduced to overcome this limitation. This measure, called ‘pednet score’, is based on a weighted pedestrian network (‘pednet’) made of sidewalks and crosswalks whose edge weights are descriptive of their popularity. Edge popularity is derived from home-based walk trip assignments derived from simulated pedestrian demand. Properties of the pednet score are studied using three hypothetical variants of the pednet in three North American cities, each involving the addition of candidate sidewalk and/or crosswalk segments. It is shown that a strategic selection of these segments based on pednet score can substantially increase walking trips, in some cases up to 236%, and reduce current mean pedestrian trip distances by up to 340 m. A mixed development approach involving both sidewalks and crosswalks also shows considerably higher improvement than those segments considered alone. Results from marginal benefit curves strongly indicate the utility of the pednet score as a measure of link criticality for segment prioritization in pedestrian network design.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进步行的步行网络设计的链接临界性方法
步行能力的衡量标准通常无法对行人基础设施发展的优先次序进行详细的量化评估。在本研究中,为了克服这一局限性,引入了一种基于链接的步行能力和步行的综合衡量方法。这种测量方法被称为 "步行网络得分",它基于一个由人行道和人行横道组成的加权步行网络("步行网络"),其边缘权重描述了它们的受欢迎程度。边缘受欢迎程度是根据模拟行人需求得出的家庭步行出行分配得出的。我们使用北美三个城市的三种假定的步行网变体研究了步行网得分的特性,每种变体都涉及增加候选人行道和/或人行横道段。结果表明,根据 pednet 分数对这些路段进行战略性选择,可大幅增加步行人次,在某些情况下可增加 236%,并将目前的平均步行距离缩短 340 米。同时涉及人行道和人行横道的混合发展方法也显示出比单独考虑这些路段更高的改善效果。边际效益曲线的结果有力地表明,在行人网络设计中,pednet 分数是衡量路段优先级的关键指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post construction infrastructural adaptation of social practices in Dhaka’s under flyover spaces More extremely hot days, more heat exposure and fewer cooling options for people of color in Connecticut, U.S. Stakeholders’ perceptions of and willingness to pay for circular economy in the construction sector Accelerating circularity systemically: three directions for impactful research Cross-scale consumption-based simulation models can promote sustainable metropolitan food systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1