Soviet Aid and the Construction of the Lanzhou Cyclotron

SU Xi 苏熹, T. 田淼
{"title":"Soviet Aid and the Construction of the Lanzhou Cyclotron","authors":"SU Xi 苏熹, T. 田淼","doi":"10.3724/sp.j.1461.2021.02089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":") Abstract: The transmission of science and technology from the Soviet Union to People’s Republic of China in the mid-twentieth century is an important research area of contemporary history of science and technology. This paper takes the construction of the cyclotron in Lanzhou, China as the case to discuss the characteristics of technology transfer from the Soviet Union to China. The review of extensive archives reveals that the construction of cyclotron took place in the framework of China’s nuclear weapons development. Although the transmission of science and technology from the Soviet Union to China fit into the one-way transmission-reception model in general, both the Chinese demand and the Soviet response had key influences on the transmission. In the early cyclotron construction, the Chinese side relied on the Soviets, and the mode of the cooperation between Soviet and Chinese engineers can be described as one of expert-student. In the early 1960s, the relationship between China and the Soviet Union broke down. The Soviet engineers were required to withdraw with the technical data, which created conflicts in the roles played by the Soviet engineers, most of whom chose to set the sense of professional responsibility as their highest priority. After the departure of the Soviet experts, Chinese physicists played the leading role in the project, using scientific knowledge they had, relying on the technical materials left by Soviet experts, and cooperating fully with local engineers, thus completing the cyclotron. This case can provide us with valuable clues for the understanding of transnational history of science and technology. The seemingly one-way transmission-reception model is actually influenced by the needs of both sides. While the transnational flow of knowledge inevitably affected by political factors from both sides, the process is far more complex than it appears.","PeriodicalId":61293,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Annals of History of Science and Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Annals of History of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1090","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1461.2021.02089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

) Abstract: The transmission of science and technology from the Soviet Union to People’s Republic of China in the mid-twentieth century is an important research area of contemporary history of science and technology. This paper takes the construction of the cyclotron in Lanzhou, China as the case to discuss the characteristics of technology transfer from the Soviet Union to China. The review of extensive archives reveals that the construction of cyclotron took place in the framework of China’s nuclear weapons development. Although the transmission of science and technology from the Soviet Union to China fit into the one-way transmission-reception model in general, both the Chinese demand and the Soviet response had key influences on the transmission. In the early cyclotron construction, the Chinese side relied on the Soviets, and the mode of the cooperation between Soviet and Chinese engineers can be described as one of expert-student. In the early 1960s, the relationship between China and the Soviet Union broke down. The Soviet engineers were required to withdraw with the technical data, which created conflicts in the roles played by the Soviet engineers, most of whom chose to set the sense of professional responsibility as their highest priority. After the departure of the Soviet experts, Chinese physicists played the leading role in the project, using scientific knowledge they had, relying on the technical materials left by Soviet experts, and cooperating fully with local engineers, thus completing the cyclotron. This case can provide us with valuable clues for the understanding of transnational history of science and technology. The seemingly one-way transmission-reception model is actually influenced by the needs of both sides. While the transnational flow of knowledge inevitably affected by political factors from both sides, the process is far more complex than it appears.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苏联的援助与兰州回旋加速器的建设
[摘要]20世纪中期苏联对中华人民共和国的科学技术传递是当代科技史的一个重要研究领域。本文以中国兰州回旋加速器建设为例,探讨了苏联对华技术转移的特点。大量的档案资料表明,回旋加速器的建设是在中国核武器发展的框架内进行的。虽然苏联对中国的科学技术传播总体上符合单向传播-接收模式,但中国的需求和苏联的反应都对传播产生了关键影响。在回旋加速器的早期建设中,中方依靠苏联,苏中工程师的合作模式可以说是一种专家-学生的合作模式。上世纪60年代初,中苏关系破裂。苏联工程师被要求带着技术资料撤离,这造成了苏联工程师角色的冲突,他们中的大多数人选择将职业责任感作为他们的最高优先事项。苏联专家离开后,中国物理学家在工程中发挥主导作用,利用自己的科学知识,依靠苏联专家留下的技术资料,与中国工程师充分合作,完成了回旋加速器。这一案例为我们理解跨国科技史提供了有价值的线索。这种看似单向的发送-接收模式,实际上受到了双方需求的影响。虽然知识的跨国流动不可避免地受到双方政治因素的影响,但这一过程远比表面上要复杂得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
期刊最新文献
The Emergence of Appropriate Technology: The Localization of German Krupp Artillery Technology in China (1866–1932) Review of Victor Seow, Carbon Technocracy: Energy Regimes in Modern East Asia Towards Planning Science and Technology in China in the 1950s The Transformation of Engineering Disciplines at Tsinghua University and the Soviet Influence Therein (1952–1960) Strategy and Practice: John B. Grant and the Rockefeller Foundation’s International Health Board in China (1917–1927)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1