{"title":"Significant learning and public administration education: The impact of short-term courses","authors":"Christopher L. Atkinson","doi":"10.1177/0144739420977902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers online courses in human resources, public budgeting, and public procurement, within a public administration program, developed and taught during one calendar year at a public regional university in the southeastern United States. Each course had an underpinning of required reading, but also included individual and collaborative role-playing and simulation activities. The effect of shorter term online classes on the potential for significant learning, in public administration programs or otherwise, has not been fully explored. The research question is: What impact do short-term classes have on the potential for significant learning? A survey of students was conducted, and the resulting corpus was analyzed, using a two-cycle coding strategy. It is concluded that short-term classes may limit the ability of students to fully gain knowledge transfer and applied skill. There are specific concerns raised by study participants about work expectations that are voluminous, even given the accelerated nature of programs, and how this might undermine the potential for quality learning outcomes. At minimum, short-term courses raise significant potential learning-related issues, and show gaps between the expectations of a knowledge-transfer-centered program and the added value of significant learning opportunities.","PeriodicalId":44241,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Public Administration","volume":"39 1","pages":"192 - 209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0144739420977902","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739420977902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
This paper considers online courses in human resources, public budgeting, and public procurement, within a public administration program, developed and taught during one calendar year at a public regional university in the southeastern United States. Each course had an underpinning of required reading, but also included individual and collaborative role-playing and simulation activities. The effect of shorter term online classes on the potential for significant learning, in public administration programs or otherwise, has not been fully explored. The research question is: What impact do short-term classes have on the potential for significant learning? A survey of students was conducted, and the resulting corpus was analyzed, using a two-cycle coding strategy. It is concluded that short-term classes may limit the ability of students to fully gain knowledge transfer and applied skill. There are specific concerns raised by study participants about work expectations that are voluminous, even given the accelerated nature of programs, and how this might undermine the potential for quality learning outcomes. At minimum, short-term courses raise significant potential learning-related issues, and show gaps between the expectations of a knowledge-transfer-centered program and the added value of significant learning opportunities.
期刊介绍:
Teaching Public Administration (TPA) is a peer-reviewed journal, published three times a year, which focuses on teaching and learning in public sector management and organisations. TPA is committed to publishing papers which promote critical thinking about the practice and process of teaching and learning as well as those which examine more theoretical and conceptual models of teaching and learning. It offers an international forum for the debate of a wide range of issues relating to how skills and knowledge are transmitted and acquired within public sector/not for profit organisations. The Editors welcome papers which draw upon multi-disciplinary ways of thinking and working and, in particular, we are interested in the following themes/issues: Learning from international practice and experience; Curriculum design and development across all levels from pre-degree to post graduate including professional development; Professional and Taught Doctoral Programmes; Reflective Practice and the role of the Reflective Practitioner; Co-production and co-construction of the curriculum; Developments within the ‘Public Administration’ discipline; Reviews of literature and policy statements.