Digitalization: new risks for people with disabilities. Problem statement

N. Meshcheryakova, E. N. Rogotneva
{"title":"Digitalization: new risks for people with disabilities. Problem statement","authors":"N. Meshcheryakova, E. N. Rogotneva","doi":"10.26425/2658-347x-2021-4-3-44-52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The philosophy of independent living implies the possibilities of leading a life independent of third parties for people with disabilities. Digitalization of the most important spheres of activity: education, employment and employment, health care, public administration is considered, among other things, as the most important tool for solving this problem. But, as empirical studies show, the secondary analysis of the results of which is carried out in this article, at the moment, digitalization creates additional social barriers, increasing segregation and exacerbating the inequality of this social community. The availability of modern information and communication technologies and the ability to use them are influenced by both independent factors common for the population (age, education, income, type of settlement), and specific ones inherent only in this social community (nosology and severity of a functional defect). Inattention within the framework of digitalization programs to the fact that disability has an individual trajectory and for the full use of modern information and communication technologies, people with disabilities need assistive technologies, the costs for them, the compatibility of auxiliary software with the design of websites is one of the main reasons for the emergence of digital inequality in this category of the population.To minimize digital barriers, depending on the individual needs of disabled people, it is proposed:1) to expand the functions, competencies and technical capabilities of social workers and / or organize technological support of life activities by volunteers;2) to develop programs of additional information education;3) to calculate the costs of assistive technologies for individual nosologies to provide targeted social assistance;4) to encourage and subsidize the development of assistive technologies within the framework of state financial assistance to high-tech developments;5) to take into account the special needs of people with disabilities in digitalization programs.","PeriodicalId":52710,"journal":{"name":"Tsifrovaia sotsiologiia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tsifrovaia sotsiologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347x-2021-4-3-44-52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The philosophy of independent living implies the possibilities of leading a life independent of third parties for people with disabilities. Digitalization of the most important spheres of activity: education, employment and employment, health care, public administration is considered, among other things, as the most important tool for solving this problem. But, as empirical studies show, the secondary analysis of the results of which is carried out in this article, at the moment, digitalization creates additional social barriers, increasing segregation and exacerbating the inequality of this social community. The availability of modern information and communication technologies and the ability to use them are influenced by both independent factors common for the population (age, education, income, type of settlement), and specific ones inherent only in this social community (nosology and severity of a functional defect). Inattention within the framework of digitalization programs to the fact that disability has an individual trajectory and for the full use of modern information and communication technologies, people with disabilities need assistive technologies, the costs for them, the compatibility of auxiliary software with the design of websites is one of the main reasons for the emergence of digital inequality in this category of the population.To minimize digital barriers, depending on the individual needs of disabled people, it is proposed:1) to expand the functions, competencies and technical capabilities of social workers and / or organize technological support of life activities by volunteers;2) to develop programs of additional information education;3) to calculate the costs of assistive technologies for individual nosologies to provide targeted social assistance;4) to encourage and subsidize the development of assistive technologies within the framework of state financial assistance to high-tech developments;5) to take into account the special needs of people with disabilities in digitalization programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字化:残疾人面临的新风险。问题陈述
独立生活哲学意味着残疾人有可能过上独立于第三方的生活。教育、就业和就业、医疗保健、公共行政等最重要活动领域的数字化被认为是解决这一问题的最重要工具。但是,正如本文对其结果进行的二次分析所表明的那样,目前,数字化造成了额外的社会障碍,加剧了种族隔离,加剧了这个社会社区的不平等。现代信息和通信技术的可用性及其使用能力既受人口常见的独立因素(年龄、教育程度、收入、定居类型)的影响,也受该社会群体固有的特定因素(疾病学和功能缺陷的严重程度)的影响。在数字化计划的框架内,人们没有注意到残疾有一个个人的轨迹,为了充分利用现代信息和通信技术,残疾人需要辅助技术,他们的成本,辅助软件与网站设计的兼容性是这类人群出现数字不平等的主要原因之一。为了最大限度地减少数字障碍,根据残疾人的个人需求,建议:1)扩大社会工作者的职能、能力和技术能力,和/或组织志愿者为生活活动提供技术支持;2) 制定附加信息教育方案;3) 为提供有针对性的社会援助的个体疾病计算辅助技术的成本;4) 在国家对高技术发展的财政援助框架内,鼓励和资助辅助技术的发展;5) 在数字化项目中考虑残疾人的特殊需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
From quantitative measurement to understanding public demand: Exploring non-survey methods in applied regional research Social risks of internet activity of virtual communities Ethnonational discourse of migrants in social networks on the example of Tajik and Kyrgyz virtual communities on VK Problem of spreading fake information in the Internet space analysis Changing content plan structure of companies operating in Russia and represented on VK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1