Between Social Justice and Decolonisation: Exploring South African MOOC Designers’ Conceptualisations and Approaches to Addressing Injustices

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Interactive Media in Education Pub Date : 2020-05-11 DOI:10.5334/jime.557
Tas Adam
{"title":"Between Social Justice and Decolonisation: Exploring South African MOOC Designers’ Conceptualisations and Approaches to Addressing Injustices","authors":"Tas Adam","doi":"10.5334/jime.557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As social justice and decolonisation discussions fill the physical and virtual corridors of universities in South Africa, educators, and in this case, MOOC designers, are inevitably influenced by them. They are prompted to reflect on such topics, whether in agreement or with scepticism. Provoked by one interviewee’s comment that ‘you could decolonise and still have an enormous amount of injustice’, this paper investigates how South African MOOC designers conceptualise (in)justice, and how they attempt to address these injustices in and through their MOOCs. As notions such as ‘social justice’ and ‘decolonisation’ have multiple meanings and connotations, a framework was created to unpack the ‘Dimensions of Human Injustice’ namely, material, cultural-epistemic, and political/geopolitical injustices. These dimensions of injustice were used to analyse semi-structured interviews with 27 South African MOOC designers. MOOC designers who stressed cultural-epistemic injustices, focused on relevance, inclusive processes and the geopolitics of knowledge production. Those who stressed material injustices, focused on socio-economic disparities, infrastructural inequalities and the need to tackle these systemic problems at a societal level. Through illustrating that MOOC designers attempt to address injustices based on their different conceptualisations of (in)justice, this study argues that a multi-pronged approach to tackling the various dimensions of injustice perpetuated in and through MOOCs can lead to more holistic justice-oriented MOOCs that better enable learners. Additionally, justice-oriented efforts by South African MOOC designers, highlighted in this paper, can be seen as a guide for the MOOC space in general to take greater strides in creating MOOCs in more justice-oriented ways.","PeriodicalId":45406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interactive Media in Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interactive Media in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

As social justice and decolonisation discussions fill the physical and virtual corridors of universities in South Africa, educators, and in this case, MOOC designers, are inevitably influenced by them. They are prompted to reflect on such topics, whether in agreement or with scepticism. Provoked by one interviewee’s comment that ‘you could decolonise and still have an enormous amount of injustice’, this paper investigates how South African MOOC designers conceptualise (in)justice, and how they attempt to address these injustices in and through their MOOCs. As notions such as ‘social justice’ and ‘decolonisation’ have multiple meanings and connotations, a framework was created to unpack the ‘Dimensions of Human Injustice’ namely, material, cultural-epistemic, and political/geopolitical injustices. These dimensions of injustice were used to analyse semi-structured interviews with 27 South African MOOC designers. MOOC designers who stressed cultural-epistemic injustices, focused on relevance, inclusive processes and the geopolitics of knowledge production. Those who stressed material injustices, focused on socio-economic disparities, infrastructural inequalities and the need to tackle these systemic problems at a societal level. Through illustrating that MOOC designers attempt to address injustices based on their different conceptualisations of (in)justice, this study argues that a multi-pronged approach to tackling the various dimensions of injustice perpetuated in and through MOOCs can lead to more holistic justice-oriented MOOCs that better enable learners. Additionally, justice-oriented efforts by South African MOOC designers, highlighted in this paper, can be seen as a guide for the MOOC space in general to take greater strides in creating MOOCs in more justice-oriented ways.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在社会正义和非殖民化之间:探索南非MOOC设计师解决不公正问题的概念和方法
随着社会正义和去殖民化的讨论充斥着南非大学的实体和虚拟走廊,教育工作者,在这种情况下,MOOC设计师,不可避免地受到他们的影响。他们被要求对这些话题进行反思,无论是赞同还是怀疑。受一位受访者的评论“你可以去殖民化,但仍然有大量的不公正”的启发,本文调查了南非MOOC设计师如何将正义概念化,以及他们如何试图通过MOOC解决这些不公正问题。由于“社会正义”和“去殖民化”等概念具有多重含义和内涵,因此创建了一个框架来解开“人类不公正的维度”,即物质,文化认知和政治/地缘政治不公正。这些不公平的维度被用来分析对27名南非MOOC设计师的半结构化访谈。强调文化认知不公正的MOOC设计师,专注于知识生产的相关性、包容性过程和地缘政治。那些强调物质不公正的国家侧重于社会经济差距、基础设施不平等以及在社会层面解决这些系统性问题的必要性。通过说明MOOC的设计者试图基于他们对正义的不同概念来解决不公正问题,本研究认为,通过多管齐下的方法来解决MOOC中存在的各种不公正问题,可以导致更全面的以正义为导向的MOOC,更好地帮助学习者。此外,本文所强调的南非MOOC设计师以正义为导向的努力,可以被视为MOOC领域在以更公正的方式创建MOOC方面迈出更大步伐的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Interactive Media in Education
Journal of Interactive Media in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Interacting through Blogs in Theatre/Drama Education: A Greek Case Study Factual vs. Fake News: Teachers’ Lens on Critical Media Literacy Education in EFL Classes An Overview of Student Perceptions of Hybrid Flexible Learning at a London HEI Investigating the Views and Use of Stackable Microcredentials within a Postgraduate Certificate in Academic Practice Using Skills Profiling to Enable Badges and Micro-Credentials to be Incorporated into Higher Education Courses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1