A Reflection on the April 9 Tragedy and the Civil War of 1991–1993 on Monumental and Symbolic Sites of Memory in Post-Soviet Georgia

IF 0.3 Q2 HISTORY Soviet and Post Soviet Review Pub Date : 2021-07-22 DOI:10.30965/18763324-BJA10038
Ketevan Epadze
{"title":"A Reflection on the April 9 Tragedy and the Civil War of 1991–1993 on Monumental and Symbolic Sites of Memory in Post-Soviet Georgia","authors":"Ketevan Epadze","doi":"10.30965/18763324-BJA10038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article examines the reflection of the April 9 Tragedy and the Civil War of 1991–1993 in the sites of memory chosen by the presidents of the Republic of Georgia. In Georgian cultural memory, the April 9 Tragedy was changed into an idea of heroic struggle. It also became a part of a memory narrative that legitimized Georgian independence and symbolized the April 9 Tragedy as the beginning of a new future for post-Soviet Georgia. The controversy over the perception of the 1991–1993 Georgian Civil War was equated with the fratricidal struggle in the Georgian capital of Tbilisi and regions of the country, which were linked with a memory narrative that was aimed at reconciling opposing social groups.","PeriodicalId":41969,"journal":{"name":"Soviet and Post Soviet Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soviet and Post Soviet Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/18763324-BJA10038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the reflection of the April 9 Tragedy and the Civil War of 1991–1993 in the sites of memory chosen by the presidents of the Republic of Georgia. In Georgian cultural memory, the April 9 Tragedy was changed into an idea of heroic struggle. It also became a part of a memory narrative that legitimized Georgian independence and symbolized the April 9 Tragedy as the beginning of a new future for post-Soviet Georgia. The controversy over the perception of the 1991–1993 Georgian Civil War was equated with the fratricidal struggle in the Georgian capital of Tbilisi and regions of the country, which were linked with a memory narrative that was aimed at reconciling opposing social groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
4月9日悲剧和1991-1993年内战在后苏联格鲁吉亚纪念性和象征性记忆遗址的反思
本文考察了格鲁吉亚共和国总统选择的记忆地点对1991年至1993年4月9日悲剧和内战的反思。在格鲁吉亚的文化记忆中,“4·9悲剧”变成了一种英勇斗争的观念。它也成为记忆叙事的一部分,使格鲁吉亚独立合法化,并将4月9日的悲剧象征为后苏联时代格鲁吉亚新未来的开始。关于1991-1993年格鲁吉亚内战的看法的争议被等同于格鲁吉亚首都第比利斯和该国各地区的自相残杀,这与旨在调和对立社会群体的记忆叙事有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
The Bloomsbury Handbook of the Russian Revolution, edited by Geoffrey Swain, et al. Editor’s Note Stalin: Piat’let Grazhdanskoi voiny i gosudarstvennogo stroitel’stva, 1917–1922 gg, written by Il’ia S. Rat’kovskii Authoritarian Laughter: Political Humor and Soviet Dystopia in Lithuania, written by Neringa Klumbytė Stalin as Warlord, written by Alfred J. Rieber
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1