Asymmetric Decentralization in A Unitary State: The Legitimization of The Sultan’s Daughter as The Governor of the Special Region of Yogyakarta

Anom Wahyu Asmorojati, S. Suyadi, King Faisal Sulaiman
{"title":"Asymmetric Decentralization in A Unitary State: The Legitimization of The Sultan’s Daughter as The Governor of the Special Region of Yogyakarta","authors":"Anom Wahyu Asmorojati, S. Suyadi, King Faisal Sulaiman","doi":"10.26555/novelty.v13i2.a24079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction to The Problem: In general, a unitary state, which democratically runs the government, rejects a monarchist system. But, Indonesia, as a unitary state which applies democracy, accepts the Special Region of Yogyakarta to have a monarchical system through the application of asymmetric decentralization. Purpose: This research aims to find the pattern of relationships and authority between a democratic unitary state and a monarchist regional government, particularly the Special Region of Yogyakarta. Methodology: This research is normative legal research that analyzes Law No. 13 of 2012 Concerning the Particularity of Yogyakarta, Regulations and Royal Decrees, and Royal Pronouncements. Findings: Indonesia and Yogyakarta’s asymmetric decentralization has a uniqueness over the asymmetric decentralization in federal states by promulgating the Sultan as the governor. Although this promulgation accords with Law No. 13 of 2012 and the Keraton Yogyakarta Hadiningrat (Yogyakarta Palace) Regulation; however, of late, both an internal and external polemic has arisen. This polemic has been triggered by Constitutional Decision No. 88/ PUU-XIV/2016 and Royal Decree and Pronouncement, which permits a female Sultan, whereas the Law of Particularity and Royal Decree confirm the Sultan must be male. This polemic","PeriodicalId":32116,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Novelty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Novelty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v13i2.a24079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction to The Problem: In general, a unitary state, which democratically runs the government, rejects a monarchist system. But, Indonesia, as a unitary state which applies democracy, accepts the Special Region of Yogyakarta to have a monarchical system through the application of asymmetric decentralization. Purpose: This research aims to find the pattern of relationships and authority between a democratic unitary state and a monarchist regional government, particularly the Special Region of Yogyakarta. Methodology: This research is normative legal research that analyzes Law No. 13 of 2012 Concerning the Particularity of Yogyakarta, Regulations and Royal Decrees, and Royal Pronouncements. Findings: Indonesia and Yogyakarta’s asymmetric decentralization has a uniqueness over the asymmetric decentralization in federal states by promulgating the Sultan as the governor. Although this promulgation accords with Law No. 13 of 2012 and the Keraton Yogyakarta Hadiningrat (Yogyakarta Palace) Regulation; however, of late, both an internal and external polemic has arisen. This polemic has been triggered by Constitutional Decision No. 88/ PUU-XIV/2016 and Royal Decree and Pronouncement, which permits a female Sultan, whereas the Law of Particularity and Royal Decree confirm the Sultan must be male. This polemic
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单一制国家中的不对称分权:苏丹之女作为日惹特区总督的合法性
问题简介:一般来说,一个民主管理政府的单一制国家拒绝君主制度。但是,印度尼西亚作为实行民主的单一制国家,通过实行不对称分权,接受日惹特区实行君主制度。目的:本研究旨在寻找民主单一制国家与君主主义地区政府之间的关系和权威模式,特别是日惹特区。研究方法:本研究是规范的法律研究,分析了2012年第13号关于日惹特殊性的法律、法规和皇家法令以及皇家公告。研究发现:印尼和日惹的不对称地方分权与以苏丹为省长的联邦制国家的不对称地方分权相比具有独特性。虽然本公告符合2012年第13号法律和《日惹皇宫条例》;然而,最近出现了内部和外部的争论。这场争论是由第88/ PUU-XIV/2016号宪法决定和皇家法令和公告引发的,该法令允许女性苏丹,而特别法和皇家法令则确认苏丹必须是男性。这个争论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implications of Utilizing Protected Forest Areas for Geothermal Business: A Legal Analysis Local Examination in Child Custody Disputes: Judges’ Efforts to Find the Best Interests of the Child Understanding the Place of Islamic Arbitration within the Nigerian Law Legal Protection of HARA Platform Users on the Service of Electronic Data Interchange Legal Protection Policy for Obstetricians-Gynecologists in Cases of Maternal, Perinatal, and Neonatal Mortality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1