UNTHEORIZING DISCOURSE

IF 1.1 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY History and Theory Pub Date : 2022-08-08 DOI:10.1111/hith.12266
Karen S. Feldman
{"title":"UNTHEORIZING DISCOURSE","authors":"Karen S. Feldman","doi":"10.1111/hith.12266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p><i>A New Philosophy of Discourse: Language Unbound</i>, by Joshua Kates, examines a range of philosophical, literary, and literary-theoretical approaches in attempting to formulate a view of language sheerly as individual events. Kates considers works from philosophers including Martin Heidegger and Hans-Georg Gadamer in the Continental tradition; Donald Davidson and W. V. O. Quine in the analytic tradition of philosophy of language; and such “crossovers” (an arguable categorization) as Ludwig Wittgenstein, Stanley Cavell, Cora Diamond, and Martha Nussbaum. The book also investigates the work of literary scholars including Mary Poovey, Charles Altieri, Paul de Man, Walter Benn Michaels, and Steven Knapp, among others. In each instance, the thinkers under scrutiny offer some support for the new philosophy of discourse that Kates proposes but fall short of the radicality of his anti-foundational, anti-structural approach. Kates coins the term “talk!” as a way to refer to language in an anti-foundational vein. The new philosophy of “talk!” proposed here emphasizes the shortcomings of the wide range of authors with respect to thinking of language as only its instances, begging the question of what avenues of thought the new philosophy opens.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47473,"journal":{"name":"History and Theory","volume":"61 3","pages":"506-513"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hith.12266","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A New Philosophy of Discourse: Language Unbound, by Joshua Kates, examines a range of philosophical, literary, and literary-theoretical approaches in attempting to formulate a view of language sheerly as individual events. Kates considers works from philosophers including Martin Heidegger and Hans-Georg Gadamer in the Continental tradition; Donald Davidson and W. V. O. Quine in the analytic tradition of philosophy of language; and such “crossovers” (an arguable categorization) as Ludwig Wittgenstein, Stanley Cavell, Cora Diamond, and Martha Nussbaum. The book also investigates the work of literary scholars including Mary Poovey, Charles Altieri, Paul de Man, Walter Benn Michaels, and Steven Knapp, among others. In each instance, the thinkers under scrutiny offer some support for the new philosophy of discourse that Kates proposes but fall short of the radicality of his anti-foundational, anti-structural approach. Kates coins the term “talk!” as a way to refer to language in an anti-foundational vein. The new philosophy of “talk!” proposed here emphasizes the shortcomings of the wide range of authors with respect to thinking of language as only its instances, begging the question of what avenues of thought the new philosophy opens.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
UNTHEORIZING话语
约书亚·凯茨的《话语的新哲学:无束缚的语言》考察了一系列哲学、文学和文学理论的方法,试图将语言纯粹视为个体事件。凯茨认为包括马丁·海德格尔和汉斯-乔治·伽达默尔在内的哲学家在大陆传统中的作品;语言哲学分析传统中的唐纳德·戴维森和奎因以及像路德维希·维特根斯坦、斯坦利·卡维尔、科拉·戴蒙德和玛莎·努斯鲍姆这样的“交叉”(一个有争议的分类)。这本书还调查了包括玛丽·普维、查尔斯·阿尔蒂耶里、保罗·德曼、沃尔特·本·迈克尔斯和史蒂文·纳普在内的文学学者的作品。在每一个例子中,被审视的思想家都为凯特提出的新话语哲学提供了一些支持,但却没有他的反基础、反结构方法的激进性。凯特创造了“谈话!”来指代一种反基础的语言。“说话!”这里提出的观点强调了众多作者在将语言仅仅作为实例来思考方面的缺陷,并提出了新哲学开启了何种思维途径的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
History and Theory
History and Theory Multiple-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: History and Theory leads the way in exploring the nature of history. Prominent international thinkers contribute their reflections in the following areas: critical philosophy of history, speculative philosophy of history, historiography, history of historiography, historical methodology, critical theory, and time and culture. Related disciplines are also covered within the journal, including interactions between history and the natural and social sciences, the humanities, and psychology.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information HOW SHOULD HISTORIANS EMPATHIZE? “TESTIMONY STOPS WHERE HISTORY BEGINS”: UNDERSTANDING AND ETHICS IN RELATION TO HISTORICAL AND PRACTICAL PASTS A HOUSE WITH EXPOSED BEAMS: INQUIRY-BASED LEARNING AND HISTORIANS’ ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES AS SCHOLAR-TEACHERS OPEN LETTERS IN CLOSED SOCIETIES: THE VALUES OF HISTORIANS UNDER ATTACK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1