Logic of the Egotistical Sentence: A Reading of Descartes

Vincent Descombes
{"title":"Logic of the Egotistical Sentence: A Reading of Descartes","authors":"Vincent Descombes","doi":"10.5195/JFFP.2018.835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This text is a translation of two extracts from Vincent Descombes' 2014 book Le parler de soi. The majority of the translation consists of the chapter (I.3) that Descombes dedicates to discussing Descartes extensively. In this text, Descombes analyzes “egotistical sentences,” or I-statements, beginning with the infamous example from Descartes (cogito ergo sum). From here, he develops a substantial meditation on the nature of the self and its inherent philosophical paradoxes. The “radical question” guiding Descombes is whether or not an egotistical sentence has or implies a subject in the metaphysical sense. The conclusion, ultimately supported in part by Anscombe’s work on “I-thoughts,” explains how it could be that a subject is not implied by an egotistical sentence.","PeriodicalId":41846,"journal":{"name":"Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/JFFP.2018.835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This text is a translation of two extracts from Vincent Descombes' 2014 book Le parler de soi. The majority of the translation consists of the chapter (I.3) that Descombes dedicates to discussing Descartes extensively. In this text, Descombes analyzes “egotistical sentences,” or I-statements, beginning with the infamous example from Descartes (cogito ergo sum). From here, he develops a substantial meditation on the nature of the self and its inherent philosophical paradoxes. The “radical question” guiding Descombes is whether or not an egotistical sentence has or implies a subject in the metaphysical sense. The conclusion, ultimately supported in part by Anscombe’s work on “I-thoughts,” explains how it could be that a subject is not implied by an egotistical sentence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我关系句的逻辑——读笛卡尔
本文翻译自Vincent Descombes 2014年出版的《soi的谈判》一书的两段节选。大部分译文包括德孔贝专门讨论笛卡尔的章节(I.3)。在本文中,Descombes分析了“利己主义句子”或I-statements,从笛卡尔臭名昭著的例子开始(cogito-ergo-sum)。从这里开始,他对自我的本质及其内在的哲学悖论进行了实质性的思考。指导Descombes的“根本问题”是,一个利己主义的句子是否具有或暗示了形而上学意义上的主题。这一结论最终在一定程度上得到了安斯科姆关于“我的思想”的工作的支持,它解释了一个主题如何不被一个利己主义的句子所暗示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Work of Staying-With Into the Looking Glass: The Mirror of Old Age in Beauvoir and Améry Loving with bell, Leaping with Fanon, and Landing Nowhere Epidermalization of Inferiority: A Fanonian Reading of Marie Vieux-Chauvet’s Amour ‘A definite quantity of all the differences in the world’: Glissant, Spinoza, and the Abyss as True Cause
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1