Elite Consensus and Balancing: A Neoclassical Realist Perspective on Pakistan–China Ties

IF 0.8 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs Pub Date : 2023-08-21 DOI:10.1177/23477970231152363
Abdul Razaque Larik, Shahnawaz Mangi, Syed Majid Ali Shah Bukhari
{"title":"Elite Consensus and Balancing: A Neoclassical Realist Perspective on Pakistan–China Ties","authors":"Abdul Razaque Larik, Shahnawaz Mangi, Syed Majid Ali Shah Bukhari","doi":"10.1177/23477970231152363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classical realism believes in the primacy of systemic pressures as independent variable and suggests states to choose appropriate balancing policies as dependent variable. However, this complex causal chain requires the role of intervening variables, which the neoclassical realist theory offers. This article employs the neoclassical realist perspective to the unexplored case of Pakistan–China ties from 1972 to 2018 presenting a causal chain that explains elite consensus as the intervening variable between the perceived Indian threat and the preference of Pakistani decision-makers for strong Pakistan–China bond. This article presents the theoretical perspective, perceived Indian threat, the balancing options available to Pakistan and elite typology. We conclude by presenting the contribution of elite consensus in Pakistan’s choice for forging closer ties with China as an appropriate balancing strategy against the perceived Indian threat specifically and external threats in general.","PeriodicalId":42502,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23477970231152363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Classical realism believes in the primacy of systemic pressures as independent variable and suggests states to choose appropriate balancing policies as dependent variable. However, this complex causal chain requires the role of intervening variables, which the neoclassical realist theory offers. This article employs the neoclassical realist perspective to the unexplored case of Pakistan–China ties from 1972 to 2018 presenting a causal chain that explains elite consensus as the intervening variable between the perceived Indian threat and the preference of Pakistani decision-makers for strong Pakistan–China bond. This article presents the theoretical perspective, perceived Indian threat, the balancing options available to Pakistan and elite typology. We conclude by presenting the contribution of elite consensus in Pakistan’s choice for forging closer ties with China as an appropriate balancing strategy against the perceived Indian threat specifically and external threats in general.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精英共识与平衡:巴中关系的新古典现实主义视角
古典现实主义认为系统压力是自变量,并建议各国选择适当的平衡政策作为因变量。然而,这种复杂的因果链需要干预变量的作用,这是新古典现实主义理论所提供的。本文采用新古典现实主义视角,对1972年至2018年未被探索的巴中关系案例进行了分析,提出了一条因果链,解释了精英共识是感知到的印度威胁与巴基斯坦决策者对强大巴中关系的偏好之间的干预变量。本文提出了理论视角、感知到的印度威胁、巴基斯坦可用的平衡选择和精英类型。最后,我们提出了精英共识对巴基斯坦选择与中国建立更紧密关系的贡献,这是一种适当的平衡战略,可以对抗印度的威胁,特别是外部威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Book review: Malti Goel, Science Diplomacy for South Asian Countries: Insights and Breakthroughs Book review: Börje Ljunggren and Dwight H. Perkins (Eds), Vietnam: Navigating a Rapidly Changing Economy, Society and Political Order Book review: Rajesh Basrur, Subcontinental Drift: Domestic Politics and India’s Foreign Policy Book review: Swaran Singh and Reena Marwah (Eds.), Multilateralism in the Indo-Pacific: Conceptual and Operational Challenges Book review: Michael Cox (ed.), Afghanistan: Long War, Forgotten Peace
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1