Unpacking the tensions between local and national skills policy: employers, colleges and Local Enterprise Partnerships as collaborative anchors

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH London Review of Education Pub Date : 2022-11-30 DOI:10.14324/lre.20.1.46
Susan James Relly, J. Robson
{"title":"Unpacking the tensions between local and national skills policy: employers, colleges and Local Enterprise Partnerships as collaborative anchors","authors":"Susan James Relly, J. Robson","doi":"10.14324/lre.20.1.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inherent tensions exist in skills policies that aim to combine national economic growth and productivity with localised implementation for education and training. This is particularly apparent in the over-emphasis on employer engagement in national education and training policy, where the localisation of skills formation is particularly envisioned through employer engagement. Yet further education colleges have acted as anchors within local skills ecosystems working successfully with employers, often through Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs), providing the key bridging mechanism between national skills policy and localised enactment. We unpack the tensions between national and local skills policy by presenting a case study of a local skills ecosystem. Through interviews with key stakeholders – representatives from the local college, the LEP, and employers – we deploy Stephen J. Ball’s approach to policy enactment to map the complex processes and tensions involved in the translation of national skills policy into local skills systems. Our findings highlight the critical role of colleges as anchor institutions in local skills ecosystems, with employers and LEPs working as ‘collaborative anchors’ in the policy cycle. We present the concept of ‘local collaborative anchors’ as a heuristic device for understanding tensions within local skills ecosystems and national skills policy enactment.","PeriodicalId":45980,"journal":{"name":"London Review of Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"London Review of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14324/lre.20.1.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inherent tensions exist in skills policies that aim to combine national economic growth and productivity with localised implementation for education and training. This is particularly apparent in the over-emphasis on employer engagement in national education and training policy, where the localisation of skills formation is particularly envisioned through employer engagement. Yet further education colleges have acted as anchors within local skills ecosystems working successfully with employers, often through Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs), providing the key bridging mechanism between national skills policy and localised enactment. We unpack the tensions between national and local skills policy by presenting a case study of a local skills ecosystem. Through interviews with key stakeholders – representatives from the local college, the LEP, and employers – we deploy Stephen J. Ball’s approach to policy enactment to map the complex processes and tensions involved in the translation of national skills policy into local skills systems. Our findings highlight the critical role of colleges as anchor institutions in local skills ecosystems, with employers and LEPs working as ‘collaborative anchors’ in the policy cycle. We present the concept of ‘local collaborative anchors’ as a heuristic device for understanding tensions within local skills ecosystems and national skills policy enactment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解开地方和国家技能政策之间的紧张关系:雇主、大学和地方企业伙伴关系作为合作支柱
旨在将国家经济增长和生产力与教育和培训本地化实施相结合的技能政策存在内在的紧张关系。这一点在国家教育和培训政策中过于强调雇主参与方面尤为明显,在国家教育培训政策中,通过雇主参与特别设想了技能形成的本地化。然而,继续教育学院在当地技能生态系统中发挥了锚定作用,通常通过当地企业伙伴关系(LEP)与雇主成功合作,为国家技能政策和本地化颁布之间提供了关键的桥梁机制。我们通过对当地技能生态系统的案例研究,揭示了国家和当地技能政策之间的紧张关系。通过与主要利益相关者——来自当地大学、LEP和雇主的代表——的访谈,我们运用Stephen J.Ball的政策制定方法,来描绘将国家技能政策转化为当地技能体系的复杂过程和紧张关系。我们的研究结果强调了大学在当地技能生态系统中作为锚定机构的关键作用,雇主和LEP在政策周期中充当“合作锚”。我们提出了“本地合作锚”的概念,作为一种启发式手段,用于理解本地技能生态系统和国家技能政策制定中的紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
London Review of Education
London Review of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
39
审稿时长
48 weeks
期刊介绍: London Review of Education (LRE), an international peer-reviewed journal, aims to promote and disseminate high-quality analyses of important issues in contemporary education. As well as matters of public goals and policies, these issues include those of pedagogy, curriculum, organisation, resources, and institutional effectiveness. LRE wishes to report on these issues at all levels and in all types of education, and in national and transnational contexts. LRE wishes to show linkages between research and educational policy and practice, and to show how educational policy and practice are connected to other areas of social and economic policy.
期刊最新文献
Defying grand narratives of ‘being an international student’: finding ‘home’ in the Other Making community-based learning and teaching happen: findings from an institutional study Choice of international branch campus: a case study Libyan teachers as transitionalist pragmatists: conceptualising a path out of the peacebuilding narrative in conflict-affected contexts The internationalisation process: an opportunity for meaningful intercultural interaction or segregation in one UK university?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1