Will policy help close the digital gender divide? An intersectional feminist policy analysis of Ethiopia's national digital policy

IF 2 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Development Policy Review Pub Date : 2023-09-08 DOI:10.1111/dpr.12743
Robert Ferritto
{"title":"Will policy help close the digital gender divide? An intersectional feminist policy analysis of Ethiopia's national digital policy","authors":"Robert Ferritto","doi":"10.1111/dpr.12743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Motivation</h3>\n \n <p>Digital technologies can enable development, but they risk further entrenching inequalities in society, such as through the digital gender divide. The divide can not only slow development, but also slow progress towards gender equality. As digital technologies become increasingly used by governments for economic development, the gendered aspects of digital technologies need to be considered.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to investigate how Ethiopia's current national policies involving digital technologies consider the digital gender divide. It asks the following research questions: (1) how do Ethiopian government policies relating to engagement with digital technologies consider gender and gendered issues? And (2) how do Ethiopian government policies capture the causes of the digital gender divide?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and approach</h3>\n \n <p>I critically analyse Ethiopian policies using an intersectional feminist lens, adapted from the work of Kanenberg et al. (2019). I applied this to the Ten Years Development Plan (10YP), Digital Ethiopia 2025, Ethiopian Education Roadmap 2018–2030 (EEDR), and Education Sector Development Programme VI (ESDP VI).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>The four policies show little consideration of gender and gendered dimensions of digital technologies. They rarely address the causes of the digital gender divide. Above all, they do not consider the underlying sociocultural barriers women face if they want to engage with digital technologies. The policies are thus unlikely to help close the digital gender divide. Ethiopia's integrationist approach to gender, as well as the patriarchal structures within which the policies are designed, probably explain these findings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Policy implications</h3>\n \n <p>A transformational gender policy paradigm, one designed to position women and men to challenge the patriarchal structures they live within, is suggested as a means of capturing and confronting the barriers women face to engaging with digital technologies in the long term.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51478,"journal":{"name":"Development Policy Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dpr.12743","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dpr.12743","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motivation

Digital technologies can enable development, but they risk further entrenching inequalities in society, such as through the digital gender divide. The divide can not only slow development, but also slow progress towards gender equality. As digital technologies become increasingly used by governments for economic development, the gendered aspects of digital technologies need to be considered.

Purpose

This study aims to investigate how Ethiopia's current national policies involving digital technologies consider the digital gender divide. It asks the following research questions: (1) how do Ethiopian government policies relating to engagement with digital technologies consider gender and gendered issues? And (2) how do Ethiopian government policies capture the causes of the digital gender divide?

Methods and approach

I critically analyse Ethiopian policies using an intersectional feminist lens, adapted from the work of Kanenberg et al. (2019). I applied this to the Ten Years Development Plan (10YP), Digital Ethiopia 2025, Ethiopian Education Roadmap 2018–2030 (EEDR), and Education Sector Development Programme VI (ESDP VI).

Findings

The four policies show little consideration of gender and gendered dimensions of digital technologies. They rarely address the causes of the digital gender divide. Above all, they do not consider the underlying sociocultural barriers women face if they want to engage with digital technologies. The policies are thus unlikely to help close the digital gender divide. Ethiopia's integrationist approach to gender, as well as the patriarchal structures within which the policies are designed, probably explain these findings.

Policy implications

A transformational gender policy paradigm, one designed to position women and men to challenge the patriarchal structures they live within, is suggested as a means of capturing and confronting the barriers women face to engaging with digital technologies in the long term.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政策会有助于缩小数字性别鸿沟吗?埃塞俄比亚国家数字政策的女权主义政策分析
数字技术可以促进发展,但也有进一步加剧社会不平等的风险,例如数字性别鸿沟。这种差距不仅会减缓发展,也会减缓性别平等的进程。随着数字技术越来越多地被政府用于经济发展,数字技术的性别方面需要考虑。本研究旨在调查埃塞俄比亚目前涉及数字技术的国家政策如何考虑数字性别鸿沟。它提出了以下研究问题:1)埃塞俄比亚政府有关参与数字技术的政策如何考虑性别和性别问题?2)埃塞俄比亚政府的政策如何抓住数字性别鸿沟的原因?我们使用交叉女权主义视角批判性地分析了埃塞俄比亚的政策,改编自Kanenberg、Leal和Erich(2019)的作品。我们将此应用于十年发展计划(10YP)、数字埃塞俄比亚2025、埃塞俄比亚教育路线图2018 - 2030 (edr)和教育部门发展计划VI (ESDP VI)。这四项政策很少考虑数字技术的性别和性别维度。他们很少解决数字性别鸿沟的原因。最重要的是,他们没有考虑到女性在使用数字技术时面临的潜在社会文化障碍。因此,这些政策不太可能有助于缩小数字性别鸿沟。埃塞俄比亚对性别的融合主义方法,以及制定政策的父权结构,可能解释了这些发现。有人建议建立一种转型的性别政策范式,旨在使妇女和男子能够挑战他们所处的父权制结构,作为捕捉和应对妇女长期参与数字技术所面临的障碍的一种手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Development Policy Review
Development Policy Review DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Development Policy Review is the refereed journal that makes the crucial links between research and policy in international development. Edited by staff of the Overseas Development Institute, the London-based think-tank on international development and humanitarian issues, it publishes single articles and theme issues on topics at the forefront of current development policy debate. Coverage includes the latest thinking and research on poverty-reduction strategies, inequality and social exclusion, property rights and sustainable livelihoods, globalisation in trade and finance, and the reform of global governance. Informed, rigorous, multi-disciplinary and up-to-the-minute, DPR is an indispensable tool for development researchers and practitioners alike.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Assessing the success of National Human Rights Action Plans from a political economy perspective: The case of Chile Reshaping gender norms: Exploring the ripple effect of refugeeism on women's empowerment Does subsidizing seed help farmers? Nepal's rice seed subsidies Social sustainability discourse in cohesion policy: A critical review of Interreg Europe 2021–2027
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1