Government digital policies and children’s rights in Uruguay: An assessment framed by the UN CRC’s dimensions of provision, protection and participation

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Global Studies of Childhood Pub Date : 2021-07-12 DOI:10.1177/20436106211027580
S. Magnone
{"title":"Government digital policies and children’s rights in Uruguay: An assessment framed by the UN CRC’s dimensions of provision, protection and participation","authors":"S. Magnone","doi":"10.1177/20436106211027580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By 2015, one-third of internet users around the world were under the age of 18, almost half of which were living in the so-called ‘Global South’. In light of this, literature from the field of children’s online rights has become increasingly critical of the lack of engagement in internet governance discussions globally with the United Nations (UN) Convention of the Rights of the Child (CRC). Revisions of the CRC for its 25th anniversary influenced scholarship proposing using it as a guiding framework to identify and regress current deficits amongst its pillars of provision, protection and participation. This has triggered debates by evidencing how dominant strategies have been overly focused on facilitating access, with issues of online protection often being ignored and at times even hindering the almost absent considerations to child’s right to participation. Framed within a national Digital Agenda initially based on a One-Laptop-Per-Child program (Plan Ceibal), the Uruguayan government managed to effectively bridge the ‘digital divide’ in access to laptops and internet amongst its youngest population. This yielded significant impacts on low-income households and its achievements allowed the country to receive frequent praise by International Organisations. This study consists of an analysis of government digital policies focused on children in Uruguay between 2009 and 2019. To facilitate this, the CRC was used as a framework to categorise key features of the principal strategies that have been implemented. It argues that while great advances have been made in terms of digital access, this has not been sufficiently accompanied with comprehensive and child-centred solutions that encompass regulations and children and adult digital education. These are fundamental aspects for promoting a critical engagement with digital technologies and tailoring strategies for digital policies championing the best interest of children and Uruguay’s digital future.","PeriodicalId":37143,"journal":{"name":"Global Studies of Childhood","volume":"11 1","pages":"358 - 372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/20436106211027580","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Studies of Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20436106211027580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By 2015, one-third of internet users around the world were under the age of 18, almost half of which were living in the so-called ‘Global South’. In light of this, literature from the field of children’s online rights has become increasingly critical of the lack of engagement in internet governance discussions globally with the United Nations (UN) Convention of the Rights of the Child (CRC). Revisions of the CRC for its 25th anniversary influenced scholarship proposing using it as a guiding framework to identify and regress current deficits amongst its pillars of provision, protection and participation. This has triggered debates by evidencing how dominant strategies have been overly focused on facilitating access, with issues of online protection often being ignored and at times even hindering the almost absent considerations to child’s right to participation. Framed within a national Digital Agenda initially based on a One-Laptop-Per-Child program (Plan Ceibal), the Uruguayan government managed to effectively bridge the ‘digital divide’ in access to laptops and internet amongst its youngest population. This yielded significant impacts on low-income households and its achievements allowed the country to receive frequent praise by International Organisations. This study consists of an analysis of government digital policies focused on children in Uruguay between 2009 and 2019. To facilitate this, the CRC was used as a framework to categorise key features of the principal strategies that have been implemented. It argues that while great advances have been made in terms of digital access, this has not been sufficiently accompanied with comprehensive and child-centred solutions that encompass regulations and children and adult digital education. These are fundamental aspects for promoting a critical engagement with digital technologies and tailoring strategies for digital policies championing the best interest of children and Uruguay’s digital future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌拉圭政府数字政策与儿童权利:联合国儿童权利公约在提供、保护和参与方面的评估
到2015年,全球三分之一的互联网用户年龄在18岁以下,其中近一半生活在所谓的“全球南方”。鉴于此,来自儿童网络权利领域的文献越来越多地批评缺乏参与与联合国儿童权利公约(CRC)的全球互联网治理讨论。《儿童权利公约》成立25周年之际的修订影响了学术界,建议将其作为指导框架,以确定和消除其提供、保护和参与支柱之间的当前赤字。这引发了争论,因为这证明了主导战略是如何过度关注于促进访问,而在线保护问题往往被忽视,有时甚至阻碍了对儿童参与权的几乎缺席的考虑。乌拉圭政府最初以“每个孩子一台笔记本电脑”计划(Plan Ceibal)为基础,制定了国家数字议程,设法在最年轻的人口中有效地弥合了“数字鸿沟”,让他们能够使用笔记本电脑和互联网。这对低收入家庭产生了重大影响,其成就使该国经常受到国际组织的赞扬。本研究包括对2009年至2019年乌拉圭政府针对儿童的数字政策的分析。为此,我们使用《儿童权利公约》作为框架,对已实施的主要策略的主要特征进行分类。报告认为,虽然在数字获取方面取得了巨大进展,但这并没有充分伴随着全面的、以儿童为中心的解决方案,这些解决方案包括法规、儿童和成人数字教育。这些是促进对数字技术的关键参与和制定数字政策战略的基本方面,这些政策支持儿童的最大利益和乌拉圭的数字未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Studies of Childhood
Global Studies of Childhood Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Decolonizing western science education and knowledge in early childhood: Rethinking natural hazards and disasters framework through indigenous ‘ecology of knowledges’ in Kenya Book review: Seen and not heard: Why children’s voices matter ‘The big crossroad’: Parenting, risk and educational transitions in Singapore Book review: A Gottlieb, The afterlife is where we come from Globalisation in and of Nordic early childhood education: Tensions between the local and the global
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1