Assessment of Inference Types (AIT): A New Test for Measuring How Well Students Make Inferences

IF 1.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Reading Psychology Pub Date : 2022-08-19 DOI:10.1080/02702711.2022.2094042
Timothy G. Morrison, B. Wilcox, R. Sudweeks, Lauren Bird, Erica Murdoch, Hannah Bursey, McKenzie Helvey
{"title":"Assessment of Inference Types (AIT): A New Test for Measuring How Well Students Make Inferences","authors":"Timothy G. Morrison, B. Wilcox, R. Sudweeks, Lauren Bird, Erica Murdoch, Hannah Bursey, McKenzie Helvey","doi":"10.1080/02702711.2022.2094042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The authors of the Common Core State Standards and publishers of literacy programs focus on an essential aspect of comprehension, the process of drawing inferences. An inference refers to any piece of information that an author does not include in text but expects readers to use to make meaning. Four common inference types are anaphoric, background knowledge, predictive, and retrospective. To date, there have been group-administered test for teachers to use to evaluate children’s abilities to draw inferences, but none focuses on these inference types. The purpose of this study was to create a reliable instrument, and the Assessment of Inference Types (AIT) was the result. It includes four passages, two narrative and two informational. Each passage has eight items, two of each inference type. Unlike most assessments, it measures students’ abilities to make inferences moment-by-moment during the act of reading, instead of before or after. The AIT was administered to a 492 fifth graders and was shown to have a .902 reliability coefficient. Armed with results of this test, teachers can identify what specific inferencing processes children have mastered and ones with which they are struggling, and plan instruction accordingly.","PeriodicalId":46567,"journal":{"name":"Reading Psychology","volume":"43 1","pages":"293 - 316"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2022.2094042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The authors of the Common Core State Standards and publishers of literacy programs focus on an essential aspect of comprehension, the process of drawing inferences. An inference refers to any piece of information that an author does not include in text but expects readers to use to make meaning. Four common inference types are anaphoric, background knowledge, predictive, and retrospective. To date, there have been group-administered test for teachers to use to evaluate children’s abilities to draw inferences, but none focuses on these inference types. The purpose of this study was to create a reliable instrument, and the Assessment of Inference Types (AIT) was the result. It includes four passages, two narrative and two informational. Each passage has eight items, two of each inference type. Unlike most assessments, it measures students’ abilities to make inferences moment-by-moment during the act of reading, instead of before or after. The AIT was administered to a 492 fifth graders and was shown to have a .902 reliability coefficient. Armed with results of this test, teachers can identify what specific inferencing processes children have mastered and ones with which they are struggling, and plan instruction accordingly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推理类型评估(AIT):衡量学生推理能力的新测试
摘要《共同核心国家标准》的作者和扫盲计划的出版商专注于理解的一个重要方面,即举一反三的过程。推理是指作者没有包含在文本中,但希望读者利用它来产生意义的任何信息。四种常见的推理类型是回指推理、背景知识推理、预测推理和回顾推理。到目前为止,已经有小组管理的测试供教师用来评估孩子的推理能力,但没有一个集中在这些推理类型上。本研究的目的是创建一个可靠的工具,推理类型评估(AIT)就是其结果。它包括四个段落,两个叙述和两个信息。每段文章有八个项目,每个推理类型有两个。与大多数评估不同,它衡量学生在阅读过程中,而不是在阅读之前或之后,一刻一刻地进行推理的能力。对492名五年级学生进行了AIT测试,结果显示其可靠性系数为.902。有了这项测试的结果,教师可以确定孩子们已经掌握了哪些具体的推理过程,以及他们正在努力的过程,并相应地计划教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reading Psychology
Reading Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Prepared exclusively by professionals, this refereed journal publishes original manuscripts in the fields of literacy, reading, and related psychology disciplines. Articles appear in the form of completed research; practitioner-based "experiential" methods or philosophical statements; teacher and counselor preparation services for guiding all levels of reading skill development, attitudes, and interests; programs or materials; and literary or humorous contributions.
期刊最新文献
Unhinged: Reading Comprehension Tests as Gatekeepers to Teaching The Regularity of High-Frequency Words (Sight Words): Teacher Phonetic Knowledge is Key Investigating the Mechanisms Behind Relations Between Academic Language and Reading Comprehension: The Role of Reading Self-Concept and Reading Enjoyment An Exploration of the Impact of Quality Illustrations in Children’s Picture Books on Preschool Student Narrative Ability Metalinguistic Effects on English Spelling: A Structural Equation Model for Early Literacy Instruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1