Comparison between Tubeless Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Flexible Ureterorenoscopic Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Calculi Larger than 1 cm
Chu-Min Chou, Chung-Jing Wang, Y. Jou, M. Cheng, Cheng-Huang Shen, Chang-te Lin
{"title":"Comparison between Tubeless Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Flexible Ureterorenoscopic Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Calculi Larger than 1 cm","authors":"Chu-Min Chou, Chung-Jing Wang, Y. Jou, M. Cheng, Cheng-Huang Shen, Chang-te Lin","doi":"10.1097/fs9.0000000000000079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n To assess the outcome and safety of tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) and flexible ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy (fURSL) in treating upper ureteral stones larger than 1 cm.\n \n \n \n Between July 2017 and June 2020, 218 patients underwent tubeless mini-PCNL and fURSL for upper ureteral calculi larger than 1 cm were enrolled in this study. Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes and complications were evaluated by retrospective chart review.\n \n \n \n Immediate stone-free rates after the procedure were 100 % of patients for the tubeless mini-PCNL and 71.0 % of patients for the fURSL group (P = 0.004). The mean operative time per patient was 79.8 ± 21.8 minutes in the tubeless mini-PCNL group, and it was 99.7 ± 33.8 minutes in the fURSL groups (P = 0.009). The average hospital stay was 2.7 ± 1.9 days in the tubeless mini-PCNL group and 1.5 ± 1.2 days in the fURSL group (P < 0.001). The rate of febrile episode for the tubeless mini-PCNL and fURSL groups were 14.3 % and 2.3%, respectively (P = 0.028)\n \n \n \n Tubeless mini-PCNL and fURSL are safe and feasible treatment options for proximal ureteral calculi larger than 1 cm. Tubeless mini-PCNL offers better outcome of higher stone-free rate and shorter operation time compared with fURSL, but with a higher rate of febrile complications and longer hospital stay.\n","PeriodicalId":12390,"journal":{"name":"Formosan Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formosan Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/fs9.0000000000000079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To assess the outcome and safety of tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) and flexible ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy (fURSL) in treating upper ureteral stones larger than 1 cm.
Between July 2017 and June 2020, 218 patients underwent tubeless mini-PCNL and fURSL for upper ureteral calculi larger than 1 cm were enrolled in this study. Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes and complications were evaluated by retrospective chart review.
Immediate stone-free rates after the procedure were 100 % of patients for the tubeless mini-PCNL and 71.0 % of patients for the fURSL group (P = 0.004). The mean operative time per patient was 79.8 ± 21.8 minutes in the tubeless mini-PCNL group, and it was 99.7 ± 33.8 minutes in the fURSL groups (P = 0.009). The average hospital stay was 2.7 ± 1.9 days in the tubeless mini-PCNL group and 1.5 ± 1.2 days in the fURSL group (P < 0.001). The rate of febrile episode for the tubeless mini-PCNL and fURSL groups were 14.3 % and 2.3%, respectively (P = 0.028)
Tubeless mini-PCNL and fURSL are safe and feasible treatment options for proximal ureteral calculi larger than 1 cm. Tubeless mini-PCNL offers better outcome of higher stone-free rate and shorter operation time compared with fURSL, but with a higher rate of febrile complications and longer hospital stay.
期刊介绍:
Formosan Journal of Surgery, a publication of Taiwan Surgical Association, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Bimonthly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.e-fjs.org. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository.