Does a large group of pedestrians follow the evacuation signs? An experimental study

IF 3.7 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 安全科学与韧性(英文) Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jnlssr.2022.08.002
Jiguang Shi , Dapeng Dong , Ning Ding , Chang Sun , Zhenyu Fan
{"title":"Does a large group of pedestrians follow the evacuation signs? An experimental study","authors":"Jiguang Shi ,&nbsp;Dapeng Dong ,&nbsp;Ning Ding ,&nbsp;Chang Sun ,&nbsp;Zhenyu Fan","doi":"10.1016/j.jnlssr.2022.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Guidance signs are generally considered to be key in improving the efficiency of emergency building evacuations. During a group evacuation, how obedient is the group to the evacuation signs? Would different evacuation signs affect the judgment of evacuated groups? Evacuation experiments were conducted to explore the influence of evacuation signs on the path selection of evacuation groups. Fourteen classes with 514 participants participated in these experiments, and each class participated in one experiment. Six classes conducted the experiments without guidance signs, and the rest conducted the experiments with guidance signs. The influences of the sign's color (red and green), pattern (arrow and running man), and status (whether it flashes) on the route selection were studied. The results show that (1) the evacuation signs significantly affect the route choices of the evacuated groups. (2) The herding effect during the evacuation process does not influence the guiding effect of evacuation signs. (3) Evacuation signs of different colors and patterns have different guiding effects, and the Green running man sign has the best effect. (4) The constant bright, or flashing evacuation sign corresponding to the flashing Red running man has a significant impact on the route selection of the evacuated group. The results may provide a reference for improving the emergency evacuation guidance model of office buildings or other buildings with a large flow of people and optimize ideas for the design and layout of emergency evacuation signs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":62710,"journal":{"name":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages 353-361"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666449622000445/pdfft?md5=e3d07f9644c6d500eab11764cbd237dd&pid=1-s2.0-S2666449622000445-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666449622000445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Guidance signs are generally considered to be key in improving the efficiency of emergency building evacuations. During a group evacuation, how obedient is the group to the evacuation signs? Would different evacuation signs affect the judgment of evacuated groups? Evacuation experiments were conducted to explore the influence of evacuation signs on the path selection of evacuation groups. Fourteen classes with 514 participants participated in these experiments, and each class participated in one experiment. Six classes conducted the experiments without guidance signs, and the rest conducted the experiments with guidance signs. The influences of the sign's color (red and green), pattern (arrow and running man), and status (whether it flashes) on the route selection were studied. The results show that (1) the evacuation signs significantly affect the route choices of the evacuated groups. (2) The herding effect during the evacuation process does not influence the guiding effect of evacuation signs. (3) Evacuation signs of different colors and patterns have different guiding effects, and the Green running man sign has the best effect. (4) The constant bright, or flashing evacuation sign corresponding to the flashing Red running man has a significant impact on the route selection of the evacuated group. The results may provide a reference for improving the emergency evacuation guidance model of office buildings or other buildings with a large flow of people and optimize ideas for the design and layout of emergency evacuation signs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一大群行人是否遵循疏散标志?实验研究
引导标志通常被认为是提高建筑物紧急疏散效率的关键。在集体疏散过程中,集体对疏散标志的服从程度如何?不同的疏散标志是否会影响疏散人群的判断?通过疏散实验,探索疏散标志对疏散人群路径选择的影响。实验共设14个班级,共514人,每个班级参与1个实验。6个班级在没有引导标志的情况下进行实验,其余班级在有引导标志的情况下进行实验。研究了标志的颜色(红色和绿色)、图案(箭头和跑人)和状态(是否闪烁)对路线选择的影响。结果表明:(1)疏散标志显著影响疏散人群的路径选择。(2)疏散过程中的羊群效应不影响疏散标志的引导作用。(3)不同颜色、图案的疏散标志引导效果不同,绿色跑人标志引导效果最好。(4)与闪烁的红色跑人相对应的持续明亮或闪烁的疏散标志对疏散群体的路线选择有显著影响。研究结果可为完善办公楼或其他人流量较大的建筑物的应急疏散引导模型,优化应急疏散标志的设计和布局思路提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
安全科学与韧性(英文)
安全科学与韧性(英文) Management Science and Operations Research, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Safety Research
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
期刊最新文献
Grasping emergency dynamics: A review of group evacuation techniques and strategies in major emergencies Multi-factor coupled forest fire model based on cellular automata Scenario construction and vulnerability assessment of natural hazards-triggered power grid accidents Risk assessment of fire casualty in underground commercial building based on FFTA-BN model Determination of individual disaster resilience levels of hospital staff: A case study of Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1