States of Security, Democracy’s Sanctuary, and Captive Maternals in Brazil and the United States

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 Q4 ETHNIC STUDIES Souls Pub Date : 2018-10-02 DOI:10.1080/10999949.2018.1521690
Joy A. James, J. Alves
{"title":"States of Security, Democracy’s Sanctuary, and Captive Maternals in Brazil and the United States","authors":"Joy A. James, J. Alves","doi":"10.1080/10999949.2018.1521690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How might we understand the current political formations that emerged from the election of Donald Trump in the United States and the parliamentary coup in Brazil? Despite the U.S. disavowal for human rights violations in foreign policies, the victory of explicitly anti-black, anti-female, anti-gay, anti-poor forces in both democracies seems to be part of the vociferous restructuring of global racial capitalism, apartheid enforced by law and police violence. The more conventional analysis is that the Brazilian coup and Trump's election represent a threat to electoral democracy. Within this perspective, the protests generated by the outcomes of electoral politics in the United States and Brazil aimed to counter the reproduction of white supremacy and racial capital. We propose an alternative reading: the political conflicts that emerged in the aftermath of both events illustrate democracy's strength and its fulfilling promise to maintain racial domination and the political grammar that authorizes its reproduction. If we consider the continuum of racial violence—from slavery to democracy—that permeated the human rights–oriented Obama and Rousseff administrations, why would we unquestionably accept that liberal democracy is the pathway to racial integration and to control anti-black violence and police terror in Brazil and the United States?","PeriodicalId":44850,"journal":{"name":"Souls","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10999949.2018.1521690","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Souls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10999949.2018.1521690","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

How might we understand the current political formations that emerged from the election of Donald Trump in the United States and the parliamentary coup in Brazil? Despite the U.S. disavowal for human rights violations in foreign policies, the victory of explicitly anti-black, anti-female, anti-gay, anti-poor forces in both democracies seems to be part of the vociferous restructuring of global racial capitalism, apartheid enforced by law and police violence. The more conventional analysis is that the Brazilian coup and Trump's election represent a threat to electoral democracy. Within this perspective, the protests generated by the outcomes of electoral politics in the United States and Brazil aimed to counter the reproduction of white supremacy and racial capital. We propose an alternative reading: the political conflicts that emerged in the aftermath of both events illustrate democracy's strength and its fulfilling promise to maintain racial domination and the political grammar that authorizes its reproduction. If we consider the continuum of racial violence—from slavery to democracy—that permeated the human rights–oriented Obama and Rousseff administrations, why would we unquestionably accept that liberal democracy is the pathway to racial integration and to control anti-black violence and police terror in Brazil and the United States?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安全国家,民主的庇护所,以及巴西和美国的被俘母亲
我们该如何理解唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)当选美国总统和巴西议会政变后出现的当前政治格局?尽管美国否认在外交政策中侵犯人权,但这两个民主国家中明确反对黑人、反对女性、反对同性恋、反对穷人的力量的胜利,似乎是全球种族资本主义、法律和警察暴力强制实施的种族隔离的喧嚣重组的一部分。更传统的分析是,巴西政变和特朗普当选代表着对选举民主的威胁。从这个角度来看,美国和巴西选举政治结果引发的抗议活动旨在反对白人至上主义和种族资本的再生产。我们提出另一种解读:这两个事件之后出现的政治冲突说明了民主的力量及其维持种族统治的实现承诺,以及授权其复制的政治语法。如果我们考虑种族暴力的连续性——从奴隶制到民主——渗透到以人权为导向的奥巴马和罗塞夫政府,为什么我们会毫无疑问地接受自由民主是通往种族融合和控制巴西和美国的反黑人暴力和警察恐怖的途径呢?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Souls
Souls ETHNIC STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Black Construction of Colonialism: The Black Marxist Response to Fascism in the 1930s “Shame Upon the Guilty City”: Riots and White Rage in the American Past and Present The Burning House: Revolution and Black Art The Struggle for International Political Recognition for New Afrikan/Black Freedom Fighters To My Son Tupac
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1