The Right to Be Counted: The Urban Poor and the Politics of Resettlement in Delhi

IF 3.3 2区 经济学 Q1 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING Journal of the American Planning Association Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI:10.1080/01944363.2023.2221596
S. Goldstein
{"title":"The Right to Be Counted: The Urban Poor and the Politics of Resettlement in Delhi","authors":"S. Goldstein","doi":"10.1080/01944363.2023.2221596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"become homeowners. Street marches and assemblies are insurgent mobilization practices while pobladores wait for the right to the city, characterized by demanding homeownership in their neighborhoods of origin without being displaced. At the same time, housing movements engaged on an institutional level by constituting comit es de allegados (state-regulated housing committees) and applying for housing subsidies. Indeed, “the poor engage subversively with state programs, transforming state-regulated assemblies into right-to-the-city organizations” (p. 85). Through his ethnographic work, the author identifies that the pobladores’ identity is an ethical and political matter. By describing the pobladores’ engagement in the housing struggles, the author proposes a shift from the traditional perspective of pobladores as a unified identity based on a class-territory category of the urban poor. Moreover, the author recognizes effort-based narratives where “pobladores operated as an assemblage of political and moral obligations by individuals to the community\" (p. 123), which determines who has the right to have rights within and outside of the organization. Similarly, P erez reflects on how pobladores reformulate their demands by struggling for a life with dignity, not as a matter of “subhuman” living conditions (p. 155), but rather to be recognized as a political and social producer of the space, empowering communities to decide on their own lives. The Right to Dignity is a book that questions planners and housing policymakers on how urban governance and housing programs are established today. P erez’s reflections are an invitation to address the limitations of transforming the urban debate toward a democratized perspective of planning and to grasp an opportunity to involve communities in the city-making process. Indeed, the book contributes to reflecting on the role and recognition of pobladores and housing movements in the actual urban contexts of neoliberal policies, understanding that there is not a romanticization of the action of the social movements but rather a new moment on the social and political characterization of housing activists in Chile. Moreover, the recognition of pobladores as a housing movement that does not rely upon self-building construction but contests for recognition, fighting the policies of displacement and segregation, struggling for the right to stay put. It also contributes to scholarship of the Global South, where housing policies via a subsidy system are expanding; at the same time, social movements are empowering themselves to achieve social recognition. Likewise, the Chilean case can be relevant for those studying the transformation of social movements today, their linkage with the historical and genealogical past, and how it affects the identification and narratives of the movements today. As an ethnographic work, the book provides insight into how the transformations of housing policies and social movements are directly intertwined. Moreover, considering the social uprising of October 2019 in Chile, where neoliberal policies were questioned by the most massive social mobilization in decades, scrutinizing the role and transformation of pobladores and housing activists should be at the center of the housing and planning discussion today.","PeriodicalId":48248,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Planning Association","volume":"89 1","pages":"604 - 605"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Planning Association","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2023.2221596","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

become homeowners. Street marches and assemblies are insurgent mobilization practices while pobladores wait for the right to the city, characterized by demanding homeownership in their neighborhoods of origin without being displaced. At the same time, housing movements engaged on an institutional level by constituting comit es de allegados (state-regulated housing committees) and applying for housing subsidies. Indeed, “the poor engage subversively with state programs, transforming state-regulated assemblies into right-to-the-city organizations” (p. 85). Through his ethnographic work, the author identifies that the pobladores’ identity is an ethical and political matter. By describing the pobladores’ engagement in the housing struggles, the author proposes a shift from the traditional perspective of pobladores as a unified identity based on a class-territory category of the urban poor. Moreover, the author recognizes effort-based narratives where “pobladores operated as an assemblage of political and moral obligations by individuals to the community" (p. 123), which determines who has the right to have rights within and outside of the organization. Similarly, P erez reflects on how pobladores reformulate their demands by struggling for a life with dignity, not as a matter of “subhuman” living conditions (p. 155), but rather to be recognized as a political and social producer of the space, empowering communities to decide on their own lives. The Right to Dignity is a book that questions planners and housing policymakers on how urban governance and housing programs are established today. P erez’s reflections are an invitation to address the limitations of transforming the urban debate toward a democratized perspective of planning and to grasp an opportunity to involve communities in the city-making process. Indeed, the book contributes to reflecting on the role and recognition of pobladores and housing movements in the actual urban contexts of neoliberal policies, understanding that there is not a romanticization of the action of the social movements but rather a new moment on the social and political characterization of housing activists in Chile. Moreover, the recognition of pobladores as a housing movement that does not rely upon self-building construction but contests for recognition, fighting the policies of displacement and segregation, struggling for the right to stay put. It also contributes to scholarship of the Global South, where housing policies via a subsidy system are expanding; at the same time, social movements are empowering themselves to achieve social recognition. Likewise, the Chilean case can be relevant for those studying the transformation of social movements today, their linkage with the historical and genealogical past, and how it affects the identification and narratives of the movements today. As an ethnographic work, the book provides insight into how the transformations of housing policies and social movements are directly intertwined. Moreover, considering the social uprising of October 2019 in Chile, where neoliberal policies were questioned by the most massive social mobilization in decades, scrutinizing the role and transformation of pobladores and housing activists should be at the center of the housing and planning discussion today.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
被计数的权利:德里的城市穷人与重新安置政治
成为业主。街头游行和集会是起义动员的做法,而流浪汉等待城市的权利,其特点是要求在他们的原籍社区拥有住房,而不是流离失所。与此同时,住房运动在体制一级进行,成立了由国家管理的住房委员会,并申请住房补贴。事实上,“穷人颠覆性地参与国家计划,将国家监管的集会转变为有权进入城市的组织”(第85页)。通过他的民族志工作,作者确定了波布拉多雷斯人的身份是一个伦理和政治问题。通过描述流浪汉在住房斗争中的参与,作者提出了一种转变,从传统的角度来看,流浪汉是基于城市穷人的阶级领土类别的统一身份。此外,作者认识到基于努力的叙述,其中“pobladores作为个人对社区的政治和道德义务的集合而运作”(第123页),这决定了谁有权在组织内外拥有权利。同样地,P . erez也反思了流浪汉如何通过争取有尊严的生活来重新制定他们的要求,而不是作为“非人”生活条件的问题(第155页),而是要被承认为空间的政治和社会生产者,赋予社区决定自己生活的权力。《尊严权》一书向规划者和住房政策制定者提出了关于当今城市治理和住房项目如何建立的问题。P erez的反思是一种邀请,旨在解决将城市辩论转变为规划民主化视角的局限性,并抓住机会让社区参与城市制定过程。事实上,这本书有助于反思在新自由主义政策的实际城市背景下,农民和住房运动的作用和认可,理解社会运动的行动不是浪漫化的,而是智利住房活动家的社会和政治特征的新时刻。更重要的是,承认“流浪汉”是一种住房运动,它不依赖于自建建筑,而是争取承认,反对流离失所和隔离政策,争取留在原地的权利。它还有助于发展中国家的学术研究,这些国家通过补贴制度制定的住房政策正在扩大;与此同时,社会运动正在赋予自己力量,以获得社会认可。同样,智利的案例可以与那些研究当今社会运动的转变,它们与历史和宗谱过去的联系,以及它如何影响当今运动的认同和叙述的人相关。作为一本民族志著作,这本书提供了关于住房政策和社会运动的转变如何直接交织在一起的见解。此外,考虑到2019年10月在智利发生的社会起义,新自由主义政策受到了几十年来最大规模的社会动员的质疑,审视农民和住房活动家的角色和转变应该是今天住房和规划讨论的中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
10.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, the quarterly Journal of the American Planning Association (JAPA) has published research, commentaries, and book reviews useful to practicing planners, policymakers, scholars, students, and citizens of urban, suburban, and rural areas. JAPA publishes only peer-reviewed, original research and analysis. It aspires to bring insight to planning the future, to air a variety of perspectives, to publish the highest quality work, and to engage readers.
期刊最新文献
Housing Precarity in Six European and North American Cities: Threatened by the Loss of a Safe, Stable, and Affordable Home Navigating Cultural Difference in Planning: How Cross-Border Adaptation Nurtured Cosmopolitan Competence Among U.S.-Taught Chinese Practitioners Food Access After Disasters The Changing American Neighborhood: The Meaning of Place in the Twenty-First Century The Changing American Neighborhood Alan Mallach and Todd Swanstrom (2023). Cornell University Press, 396 pages. $31.95 (paperback) Welcome to the New Editorial Group
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1