Economic Viability of Winter-Wheat Tillage Systems

IF 0.5 Q4 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Poljoprivreda Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.18047/poljo.28.1.11
M. Stošić, L. Ranogajec, B. Popović
{"title":"Economic Viability of Winter-Wheat Tillage Systems","authors":"M. Stošić, L. Ranogajec, B. Popović","doi":"10.18047/poljo.28.1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A multidisciplinary field experiment for winter wheat was conducted in Croatia during three seasons. The intention was to examine the effect of tillage systems (TS) on the economic indicators, that is, on the gross margin (GM), rate of profitability (ROP), cost-effectiveness (E) and productivity (P). The TSs were as follows: CT — plowing up to a 30 cm depth, DT — disking up 8-12 cm, LT — loosening up to 35 cm and NT — no-tillage. The experimental design was a randomized block one in four repetitions, whereby the basic TS plot amounted to 540 m2. The economic indicators were calculated using the economic equations and standards. Statistical analysis was performed with the SAS 9.3 and Microsoft Excel 2016 software. The results are pointing that the LT assigned the prime economic results. The ROP was in the following order: CT (32.67%) < DT (37.39%) < LT (40.31%) < NT (42.29%). The same order was established for the E, as follows: CT (1.33) < DT (1.37) < LT (1.40) < NT (1.42). The NT established the best P because of the lowest production costs, but due to a significantly lower yield, the NT has a limited adoption in practice. A viable agricultural production by the implementation of reduced soil tillage systems has its capabilities and potential while invigorating economic sustainability and agricultural production’s financial efficiency.","PeriodicalId":44286,"journal":{"name":"Poljoprivreda","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poljoprivreda","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18047/poljo.28.1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A multidisciplinary field experiment for winter wheat was conducted in Croatia during three seasons. The intention was to examine the effect of tillage systems (TS) on the economic indicators, that is, on the gross margin (GM), rate of profitability (ROP), cost-effectiveness (E) and productivity (P). The TSs were as follows: CT — plowing up to a 30 cm depth, DT — disking up 8-12 cm, LT — loosening up to 35 cm and NT — no-tillage. The experimental design was a randomized block one in four repetitions, whereby the basic TS plot amounted to 540 m2. The economic indicators were calculated using the economic equations and standards. Statistical analysis was performed with the SAS 9.3 and Microsoft Excel 2016 software. The results are pointing that the LT assigned the prime economic results. The ROP was in the following order: CT (32.67%) < DT (37.39%) < LT (40.31%) < NT (42.29%). The same order was established for the E, as follows: CT (1.33) < DT (1.37) < LT (1.40) < NT (1.42). The NT established the best P because of the lowest production costs, but due to a significantly lower yield, the NT has a limited adoption in practice. A viable agricultural production by the implementation of reduced soil tillage systems has its capabilities and potential while invigorating economic sustainability and agricultural production’s financial efficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冬小麦耕作制度的经济可行性
在克罗地亚进行了为期三个季节的冬小麦多学科田间试验。目的是考察不同耕作制度(TS)对经济指标的影响,即对毛利率(GM)、收益率(ROP)、成本效益(E)和生产率(P)的影响。TSs如下:CT -犁耕至30 cm深,DT -盘耕至8-12 cm, LT -松耕至35 cm, NT -免耕。试验设计为随机分组,每4次重复1次,其中基本TS地块面积为540 m2。采用经济方程和经济标准计算经济指标。采用SAS 9.3和Microsoft Excel 2016软件进行统计分析。研究结果表明,最低工资制度具有最优的经济效益。ROP依次为:CT (32.67%) < DT (37.39%) < LT (40.31%) < NT(42.29%)。E的顺序为:CT (1.33) < DT (1.37) < LT (1.40) < NT(1.42)。由于生产成本最低,新氮肥确定了最佳磷肥,但由于产量显著降低,新氮肥在实践中采用有限。实施减少土壤耕作制度的可行农业生产在增强经济可持续性和农业生产的财政效率的同时具有其能力和潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Poljoprivreda
Poljoprivreda AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
13
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: POLJOPRIVREDA“ (AGRICULTURE), a scientific-professional journal has been issued since 1995 by the Faculty of Agriculture in Osijek and Agricultural Institute Osijek . The journal is a successor of the former one „Science and practice in agriculture and food technology“ printed from 1982 to 1994. The journal „Poljoprivreda“ is known for publishing scientific and professional articles from all fields of agricultural science and profession. The papers are reviewed. Articles are categorized by two independent referees and approved by Editorial board and Editor – in – chief. Summaries of master"s and doctor"s theses are also published as well as other contributions by the special decisions of the Editorial board.
期刊最新文献
Status nematoda korijenovih kvržica roda Meloidogyne u Hrvatskoj, s posebnim osvrtom na karantenske vrste The Dynamic of Lead Accumulation in the Almond Leaves and in the Parts of the Fruit The Changes in Susceptibility Status of the Old and of the Newly Registered Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Cultivars with Respect to the Blight Disease Caused by the Pathotypes of Ascochyta rabiei (Pass.) Labr Technological and Economic Optimization of Honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) Colony Production The Status of Root-Knot Nematodes of the Meloidogyne Genus in Croatia, with a Special Reference to the Quarantine Species
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1