Industry in a net-zero emissions world: New mitigation pathways, new supply chains, modelling needs and policy implications

IF 5.8 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Energy and climate change Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.egycc.2021.100059
Chris Bataille, Lars J. Nilsson, Frank Jotzo
{"title":"Industry in a net-zero emissions world: New mitigation pathways, new supply chains, modelling needs and policy implications","authors":"Chris Bataille,&nbsp;Lars J. Nilsson,&nbsp;Frank Jotzo","doi":"10.1016/j.egycc.2021.100059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective implicit in the Paris Agreement, net-zero emissions around mid-century, has transformed the debate about heavy industry decarbonisation. Prior to Paris, the iron and steel, cement and concrete, chemicals, and other materials sectors were expected to reduce absolute emissions by perhaps half by 2050, through measures like energy efficiency, biofuels and carbon capture and storage. Global net-zero emissions means that these industries face far deeper transformation and potentially costly offsetting. It is also becoming clear, however, that very low emissions in heavy industry are technically possible using a spectrum of new options, including demand management, materials efficiency, and direct and green hydrogen-based electrification of primary materials production, facilitated by the falling cost of renewable electricity. Very low emissions production chains mean changes to the location of the world's heavy industry, including splitting processes into components to allow use of large-scale low-cost renewable energy or access to geological CO<sub>2</sub> storage, with implications for trade. Existing models used for decarbonisation analysis typically do not represent the detail necessary for a full understanding of the range of mitigation options. Better representation of industry in systems modelling, along with analysis and learning about policy options and sequencing as industry transformations unfold, will be important for reaching net-zero and net-negative emissions in cost-effective and just ways. Key options, implications for the geography of heavy industry, and implications for systems modelling and policy are outlined here.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72914,"journal":{"name":"Energy and climate change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and climate change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278721000362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

The objective implicit in the Paris Agreement, net-zero emissions around mid-century, has transformed the debate about heavy industry decarbonisation. Prior to Paris, the iron and steel, cement and concrete, chemicals, and other materials sectors were expected to reduce absolute emissions by perhaps half by 2050, through measures like energy efficiency, biofuels and carbon capture and storage. Global net-zero emissions means that these industries face far deeper transformation and potentially costly offsetting. It is also becoming clear, however, that very low emissions in heavy industry are technically possible using a spectrum of new options, including demand management, materials efficiency, and direct and green hydrogen-based electrification of primary materials production, facilitated by the falling cost of renewable electricity. Very low emissions production chains mean changes to the location of the world's heavy industry, including splitting processes into components to allow use of large-scale low-cost renewable energy or access to geological CO2 storage, with implications for trade. Existing models used for decarbonisation analysis typically do not represent the detail necessary for a full understanding of the range of mitigation options. Better representation of industry in systems modelling, along with analysis and learning about policy options and sequencing as industry transformations unfold, will be important for reaching net-zero and net-negative emissions in cost-effective and just ways. Key options, implications for the geography of heavy industry, and implications for systems modelling and policy are outlined here.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
零净排放世界中的工业:新的缓解途径、新的供应链、建模需求和政策影响
《巴黎协定》隐含的目标是在本世纪中叶左右实现净零排放,这改变了有关重工业脱碳的辩论。在巴黎会议之前,钢铁、水泥和混凝土、化工和其他材料行业预计将通过提高能源效率、生物燃料和碳捕获和储存等措施,到2050年将绝对排放量减少一半左右。全球净零排放意味着这些行业将面临更深层次的转型和可能代价高昂的抵消。然而,也越来越清楚的是,重工业的极低排放在技术上是可能的,使用一系列新的选择,包括需求管理、材料效率、直接和绿色的初级材料生产的氢基电气化,这些都是由可再生电力成本下降推动的。极低排放的生产链意味着改变世界重工业的位置,包括将过程分成几个部分,以便大规模使用低成本的可再生能源,或利用地质封存二氧化碳,这对贸易有影响。用于脱碳分析的现有模型通常不能提供充分了解各种缓解方案所需的细节。在系统建模中更好地代表行业,随着行业转型的展开,对政策选择和排序进行分析和学习,对于以具有成本效益和公正的方式实现净零排放和净负排放至关重要。这里概述了关键选项、对重工业地理的影响以及对系统建模和政策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and climate change
Energy and climate change Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparing green hydrogen and green ammonia as energy carriers in utility-scale transport and subsurface storage Global trade of green iron as a game changer for a near-zero global steel industry? - A scenario-based assessment of regionalized impacts Strategic approach to accelerating regional bioenergy development: Bioelectricity for emission reduction and sustainability The role of the pulp and paper industry in achieving net zero U.S. CO2 emissions in 2050 Exploring attitudes and behavioral patterns in residential energy consumption: Data-driven by a machine learning approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1