Inductively Versus Deductively Structured Product Descriptions: Effects on Chinese and Western Readers

IF 1.8 2区 文学 Q3 BUSINESS Journal of Business and Technical Communication Pub Date : 2020-06-24 DOI:10.1177/1050651920932192
Qian Li, J. Karreman, M. D. de Jong
{"title":"Inductively Versus Deductively Structured Product Descriptions: Effects on Chinese and Western Readers","authors":"Qian Li, J. Karreman, M. D. de Jong","doi":"10.1177/1050651920932192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the effects of inductively versus deductively organized product descriptions on Chinese and Western readers. It uses a 2 × 3 experimental design with text structure (inductive versus deductive) and cultural background (Chinese living in China, Chinese living in the Netherlands, and Westerners) as independent variables and recall, reading time, and readers’ opinions as dependent variables. Participants read a product description that explained two refrigerator types and then recommended which one to purchase. The results showed that Chinese readers rated readability and persuasiveness higher when the text was structured inductively whereas Western readers rated these aspects equally high for the inductively and deductively structured text. The results suggest that culturally preferred organizing principles do not affect readers’ ability to read and understand texts but that these principles might affect their opinions about the texts.","PeriodicalId":46414,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business and Technical Communication","volume":"34 1","pages":"335 - 363"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1050651920932192","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business and Technical Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651920932192","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study examines the effects of inductively versus deductively organized product descriptions on Chinese and Western readers. It uses a 2 × 3 experimental design with text structure (inductive versus deductive) and cultural background (Chinese living in China, Chinese living in the Netherlands, and Westerners) as independent variables and recall, reading time, and readers’ opinions as dependent variables. Participants read a product description that explained two refrigerator types and then recommended which one to purchase. The results showed that Chinese readers rated readability and persuasiveness higher when the text was structured inductively whereas Western readers rated these aspects equally high for the inductively and deductively structured text. The results suggest that culturally preferred organizing principles do not affect readers’ ability to read and understand texts but that these principles might affect their opinions about the texts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
归纳与演绎结构产品描述对中西读者的影响
这项研究考察了归纳和演绎组织的产品描述对中西方读者的影响。它采用了一个2×3的实验设计,以文本结构(归纳与演绎)和文化背景(中国人、荷兰人和西方人)为自变量,回忆、阅读时间和读者意见为因变量。参与者阅读了一份产品说明,其中解释了两种冰箱类型,然后建议购买哪种。结果表明,当文本采用归纳结构时,中国读者对可读性和说服力的评价更高,而西方读者对归纳结构和演绎结构的文本在这些方面的评价同样高。研究结果表明,文化偏好的组织原则不会影响读者阅读和理解文本的能力,但这些原则可能会影响他们对文本的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
18.20%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: JBTC is a refereed journal that provides a forum for discussion of communication practices, problems, and trends in business, professional, scientific, and governmental fields. As such, JBTC offers opportunities for bridging dichotomies that have traditionally existed in professional communication journals between business and technical communication and between industrial and academic audiences. Because JBTC is designed to disseminate knowledge that can lead to improved communication practices in both academe and industry, the journal favors research that will inform professional communicators in both sectors. However, articles addressing one sector or the other will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Automating Research in Business and Technical Communication: Large Language Models as Qualitative Coders Using Generative AI to Facilitate Data Analysis and Visualization: A Case Study of Olympic Athletes On the Current Moment in AI: Introduction to Special Issue on Effects of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Technical Communication Pedagogy, Practice, and Research, Part 1 Comparing Student and Writing Instructor Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty When Collaborators Are Artificial Intelligence or Human Preparing Future Technical Editors for an Artificial Intelligence-enabled Workplace
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1