Nicknames in teaching Russian as a foreign language

Q2 Arts and Humanities Russian Language Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-30 DOI:10.22363/2618-8163-2022-20-1-22-34
M. Bobrova
{"title":"Nicknames in teaching Russian as a foreign language","authors":"M. Bobrova","doi":"10.22363/2618-8163-2022-20-1-22-34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question of expanding the range of linguistic units involved as a linguo-didactic material is raised in the article. The purpose of the work is to substantiate the need to use such a category of proper names as nicknames in the framework of the Russian as a foreign language course. Illustrative material mainly includes well-known, culturally significant nicknames of historical and political figures, as well as modern informal names. The relevance of the research is ensured by the fact that the selection of anthroponyms as educational materials in teaching Russian as a foreign language is not typical for the current linguistic, linguo-cultural and socio-cultural situation. In particular, there is a contradiction between the negative attitude to nicknames established in the society and their real status in the Russian anthroponymic system. Due to the underestimation of the role of nicknames in the society, this type of anthroponyms is not represented in the didactic materials on Russian as a foreign language. However, it is advisable to introduce nicknames in teaching, since they have been a fact of the Russian linguistic and cultural space throughout its existence and meet all the basic approaches of modern Russian pedagogy: competence-based, meta-subject and axiological. The descriptive-analytical method was the leading research method in the article. Nicknames are considered as a category of anthroponyms. The author shows that nicknames are a fact of linguistic and social communication, a linguistic, socio-cultural and individual psychological phenomenon. Nicknames are multifunctional: they perform nominative, identifying, differentiating, individualizing, marking, emotive, axiological, and other functions. The teacher of Russian as a foreign language taking into account the relevance, cognitive significance and communicative value of nicknames; it is necessary to distinguish them from similar categories - pseudonyms and Internet nicknames. The adequacy of the selection will be facilitated by relying on the authors classification of nicknames. Nicknames provide rich material for mastering various linguistic topics properly and establishing meta-subject connections. This approach will make it possible to overcome the separation from reality to some extent, and to improve the quality of teaching Russian to foreigners, develop their competencies, improve their linguistic personality, and introduce them to Russian culture.","PeriodicalId":36031,"journal":{"name":"Russian Language Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2618-8163-2022-20-1-22-34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The question of expanding the range of linguistic units involved as a linguo-didactic material is raised in the article. The purpose of the work is to substantiate the need to use such a category of proper names as nicknames in the framework of the Russian as a foreign language course. Illustrative material mainly includes well-known, culturally significant nicknames of historical and political figures, as well as modern informal names. The relevance of the research is ensured by the fact that the selection of anthroponyms as educational materials in teaching Russian as a foreign language is not typical for the current linguistic, linguo-cultural and socio-cultural situation. In particular, there is a contradiction between the negative attitude to nicknames established in the society and their real status in the Russian anthroponymic system. Due to the underestimation of the role of nicknames in the society, this type of anthroponyms is not represented in the didactic materials on Russian as a foreign language. However, it is advisable to introduce nicknames in teaching, since they have been a fact of the Russian linguistic and cultural space throughout its existence and meet all the basic approaches of modern Russian pedagogy: competence-based, meta-subject and axiological. The descriptive-analytical method was the leading research method in the article. Nicknames are considered as a category of anthroponyms. The author shows that nicknames are a fact of linguistic and social communication, a linguistic, socio-cultural and individual psychological phenomenon. Nicknames are multifunctional: they perform nominative, identifying, differentiating, individualizing, marking, emotive, axiological, and other functions. The teacher of Russian as a foreign language taking into account the relevance, cognitive significance and communicative value of nicknames; it is necessary to distinguish them from similar categories - pseudonyms and Internet nicknames. The adequacy of the selection will be facilitated by relying on the authors classification of nicknames. Nicknames provide rich material for mastering various linguistic topics properly and establishing meta-subject connections. This approach will make it possible to overcome the separation from reality to some extent, and to improve the quality of teaching Russian to foreigners, develop their competencies, improve their linguistic personality, and introduce them to Russian culture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对外俄语教学中的昵称
这篇文章提出了扩大作为林果教材所涉及的语言单位范围的问题。这项工作的目的是证实在俄语作为外语课程的框架内使用这样一类专有名称作为昵称的必要性。插图材料主要包括历史和政治人物的知名、具有文化意义的昵称,以及现代非正式名称。这项研究的相关性得到了保证,因为在当前的语言、林国文化和社会文化状况下,在对外俄语教学中选择人名作为教材并不典型。特别是,社会上对昵称的负面态度与其在俄罗斯人类名称系统中的真实地位之间存在矛盾。由于低估了昵称在社会中的作用,这种类型的人类名称在关于俄语作为外语的教学材料中没有体现出来。然而,在教学中引入昵称是可取的,因为昵称在俄罗斯语言和文化空间的整个存在过程中都是事实,并且符合现代俄罗斯教育学的所有基本方法:基于能力的、元主体的和价值论的。描述性分析方法是本文的主要研究方法。昵称被认为是人类名称学的一个类别。作者认为,昵称是语言和社会交往的一个事实,是一种语言、社会文化和个体心理现象。昵称是多功能的:它们具有主格、识别、区分、个性化、标记、情感、价值论和其他功能。俄语教师应考虑昵称的相关性、认知意义和交际价值;有必要将它们与类似的类别(假名和网络昵称)区分开来。根据作者对昵称的分类,将有助于选择的充分性。昵称为正确掌握各种语言主题和建立元主体联系提供了丰富的素材。这种方法将在一定程度上克服与现实的脱节,提高外国人俄语教学的质量,发展他们的能力,提高他们的语言个性,并向他们介绍俄罗斯文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Russian Language Studies
Russian Language Studies Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Textbooks on reading in Russian for Chinese universities over the past 30 years: analysis and prospects Semantic dynamics of the lexeme ‘pensioner’ in Russian linguistic culture Linguistic intuition in the system of teaching Russian as a foreign language at the pre-university stage Intersection of the lexical-semantic fields “Mentality” and “Physiology” in the poetic language of Igor-Severyanin Educating future Russian language teachers in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1