The Prospect Theory and First Price Auctions: an Explanation of Overbidding

IF 1.1 Q3 ECONOMICS Econometrics Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.15611/eada.2023.1.03
Dushko Josheski, M. Apostolov
{"title":"The Prospect Theory and First Price Auctions: an Explanation of Overbidding","authors":"Dushko Josheski, M. Apostolov","doi":"10.15611/eada.2023.1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper attempted using the prospect theory to explain overbidding in first price auctions. The standard outlook in the literature on auctions is that bidders overbid, but the probability weighting functions are nonlinear as in the prospect theory, so they not only tend to underweight the probabilities of winning the auction but also overweight, so that there are overbidders and underbidders. This paper proves that to some extent, non-linear weighting functions do explain overbidding the risk-neutral Nash equilibrium valuation (RNNE). Furthermore, coherent risk measures, such as certainty equivalent and translation invariance, were used to show loss aversion among bidders, and in line with the prospect theory, convexity was also confirmed with sub-additivity, monotonicity and with positive homogeneity.","PeriodicalId":11499,"journal":{"name":"Econometrics","volume":"27 1","pages":"33 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15611/eada.2023.1.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper attempted using the prospect theory to explain overbidding in first price auctions. The standard outlook in the literature on auctions is that bidders overbid, but the probability weighting functions are nonlinear as in the prospect theory, so they not only tend to underweight the probabilities of winning the auction but also overweight, so that there are overbidders and underbidders. This paper proves that to some extent, non-linear weighting functions do explain overbidding the risk-neutral Nash equilibrium valuation (RNNE). Furthermore, coherent risk measures, such as certainty equivalent and translation invariance, were used to show loss aversion among bidders, and in line with the prospect theory, convexity was also confirmed with sub-additivity, monotonicity and with positive homogeneity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前景理论与首价拍卖:对超竞价的解释
摘要本文试图用前景理论解释首价拍卖中的超竞价现象。文献中关于拍卖的标准观点是竞标者出价过高,但概率加权函数与前景理论一样是非线性的,因此它们不仅倾向于低估拍卖中标的概率,而且倾向于高估拍卖中标的概率,从而出现了出价过高和出价过低的情况。本文证明了非线性加权函数在一定程度上可以解释风险中性纳什均衡估值(RNNE)的超出价。此外,采用确定性等价、平移不变性等一致性风险度量来显示竞标者的损失厌恶,并根据前景理论,通过次可加性、单调性和正同质性来证实凹凸性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Econometrics
Econometrics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Score-Driven Interactions for “Disease X” Using COVID and Non-COVID Mortality Signs of Fluctuations in Energy Prices and Energy Stock-Market Volatility in Brazil and in the US Transient and Persistent Technical Efficiencies in Rice Farming: A Generalized True Random-Effects Model Approach Is It Sufficient to Select the Optimal Class Number Based Only on Information Criteria in Fixed- and Random-Parameter Latent Class Discrete Choice Modeling Approaches? Instrumental Variable Method for Regularized Estimation in Generalized Linear Measurement Error Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1