Emotional instability and expressive suppression are related to paranoia in daily life: An electronic mobile assessment study in nonclinical individuals

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Experimental Psychopathology Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI:10.1177/2043808719868119
C. Nittel, Fabian Lamster, W. Rief, T. Kircher, Daniel Soll, Stephanie Mehl
{"title":"Emotional instability and expressive suppression are related to paranoia in daily life: An electronic mobile assessment study in nonclinical individuals","authors":"C. Nittel, Fabian Lamster, W. Rief, T. Kircher, Daniel Soll, Stephanie Mehl","doi":"10.1177/2043808719868119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although instable negative emotions and problems in emotion regulation (ER) are common in patients with psychosis and are discussed as potential factors involved in the formation and maintenance of paranoia, it is unclear whether they increase the risk of developing paranoia in nonclinical controls. The present study aims to investigate whether the instability of negative emotions leads to paranoia in healthy participants. It should be further analyzed if the application of maladaptive ER strategies enhances subclinical paranoid ideation and if the use of adaptive ER strategies reduces subclinical paranoid ideation. Method: Nonclinical controls (n = 83) repeatedly reported the presence and instability of negative emotions, paranoia, and the use of maladaptive (expressive suppression, rumination) and adaptive (reappraisal, acceptance) ER strategies in their daily life on six consecutive days using electronic mobile assessment. Results: Hierarchical linear regression analysis revealed that nonclinical controls reporting a pronounced instability of negative emotions showed more pronounced paranoia at a subsequent time point. Moreover, participants who used expressive suppression at a certain time experienced more severe paranoia at the subsequent time point. Conclusion: If these findings are confirmed in high-risk samples, ER processes could be considered as an additional factor in theoretical models of paranoia formation.","PeriodicalId":48663,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2043808719868119","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2043808719868119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Although instable negative emotions and problems in emotion regulation (ER) are common in patients with psychosis and are discussed as potential factors involved in the formation and maintenance of paranoia, it is unclear whether they increase the risk of developing paranoia in nonclinical controls. The present study aims to investigate whether the instability of negative emotions leads to paranoia in healthy participants. It should be further analyzed if the application of maladaptive ER strategies enhances subclinical paranoid ideation and if the use of adaptive ER strategies reduces subclinical paranoid ideation. Method: Nonclinical controls (n = 83) repeatedly reported the presence and instability of negative emotions, paranoia, and the use of maladaptive (expressive suppression, rumination) and adaptive (reappraisal, acceptance) ER strategies in their daily life on six consecutive days using electronic mobile assessment. Results: Hierarchical linear regression analysis revealed that nonclinical controls reporting a pronounced instability of negative emotions showed more pronounced paranoia at a subsequent time point. Moreover, participants who used expressive suppression at a certain time experienced more severe paranoia at the subsequent time point. Conclusion: If these findings are confirmed in high-risk samples, ER processes could be considered as an additional factor in theoretical models of paranoia formation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情绪不稳定和表达抑制与日常生活中的妄想症有关:一项非临床个体的电子移动评估研究
虽然不稳定的负性情绪和情绪调节(ER)问题在精神病患者中很常见,并被认为是偏执形成和维持的潜在因素,但在非临床对照中,它们是否会增加患偏执的风险尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨负面情绪的不稳定性是否会导致健康参与者的偏执。应用适应性不良的内质反应策略是否会增强亚临床偏执意识,而使用适应性内质反应策略是否会减少亚临床偏执意识,这有待进一步分析。方法:非临床对照(83例)连续6天使用电子移动评估,反复报告其日常生活中存在负面情绪、偏执、不稳定以及使用不适应(表达抑制、反刍)和适应性(重新评价、接受)ER策略。结果:层次线性回归分析显示,报告负面情绪明显不稳定的非临床对照在随后的时间点表现出更明显的偏执。此外,在某个时间点使用表达抑制的参与者在随后的时间点经历了更严重的偏执。结论:如果这些发现在高风险样本中得到证实,内质网过程可以被认为是偏执形成理论模型中的一个额外因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Psychopathology
Journal of Experimental Psychopathology Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychopathology (EPP) is an open access, peer reviewed, journal focused on publishing cutting-edge original contributions to scientific knowledge in the general area of psychopathology. Although there will be an emphasis on publishing research which has adopted an experimental approach to describing and understanding psychopathology, the journal will also welcome submissions that make significant contributions to knowledge using other empirical methods such as correlational designs, meta-analyses, epidemiological and prospective approaches, and single-case experiments.
期刊最新文献
Linking maladaptive food avoidance and anorexia nervosa symptoms: An analogue study Approach and Conquer: Optimizing Fear Extinction by Adding Approach? “If I feel disgusted, I will become fat”: Disgust-based emotional reasoning in the context of weight and shape concerns No Evidence for Decreased Generalization of Fear Extinction in High-Trait Anxious Individuals Long-term memory for faces in dysmorphic concern and self-reported body dysmorphic disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1