Core professional values for school leaders and teachers: Piloting an online tool

S. Lovett
{"title":"Core professional values for school leaders and teachers: Piloting an online tool","authors":"S. Lovett","doi":"10.21307/JELPP-2018-014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Evidence of the extent to which school leaders and teachers embrace core professional values may, through dialogue, open up new avenues for school improvement. With this in mind, the focus of this article is the piloting of an online survey tool designed to identify how widely four such values are held in New Zealand schools. The pilot was commissioned by the Te Ariki Trust with the support of the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI), the New Zealand Principals’ Federation (NZPF) and the University of Canterbury. The tool is based on items which together, define four values underpinning the mission of the Te Ariki Trust, namely “Professional Discretion”, “Collegial Obligation”, “Reflective Inquiry and Discourse” and “Evidencebased Professional Practice”. An analysis of one school’s responses to such a survey tool is one way to gauge evidence of collective commitment, the strength of collegial relationships and trust, with the realisation that knowing how to collect and reflect on data matters if important decisions are to be well informed. The article draws upon research and scholarly writing to explain the four values, describe the development of the tool and its pilot study and suggest what the results might offer for dialogue using the findings from a sample school whose staff members completed the instrument. Suggested changes to the instrument and its use conclude the article.","PeriodicalId":33385,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Leadership Policy and Practice","volume":"33 1","pages":"72 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Leadership Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/JELPP-2018-014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Evidence of the extent to which school leaders and teachers embrace core professional values may, through dialogue, open up new avenues for school improvement. With this in mind, the focus of this article is the piloting of an online survey tool designed to identify how widely four such values are held in New Zealand schools. The pilot was commissioned by the Te Ariki Trust with the support of the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI), the New Zealand Principals’ Federation (NZPF) and the University of Canterbury. The tool is based on items which together, define four values underpinning the mission of the Te Ariki Trust, namely “Professional Discretion”, “Collegial Obligation”, “Reflective Inquiry and Discourse” and “Evidencebased Professional Practice”. An analysis of one school’s responses to such a survey tool is one way to gauge evidence of collective commitment, the strength of collegial relationships and trust, with the realisation that knowing how to collect and reflect on data matters if important decisions are to be well informed. The article draws upon research and scholarly writing to explain the four values, describe the development of the tool and its pilot study and suggest what the results might offer for dialogue using the findings from a sample school whose staff members completed the instrument. Suggested changes to the instrument and its use conclude the article.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学校领导和教师的核心专业价值观:试用在线工具
摘要学校领导和教师在多大程度上接受核心职业价值观的证据,可以通过对话为学校改进开辟新的途径。考虑到这一点,本文的重点是试行一种在线调查工具,旨在确定新西兰学校中四种此类价值观的持有范围。该试点项目由Te Ariki信托基金会委托,得到了新西兰教育研究所(NZEI)、新西兰校长联合会(NZPF)和坎特伯雷大学的支持。该工具基于共同定义了Te Ariki信托使命的四个价值观的项目,即“专业自由裁量权”、“大学义务”、“反思性调查和话语”和“基于证据的专业实践”。分析一所学校对此类调查工具的反应是衡量集体承诺、大学关系和信任强度的证据的一种方法,同时认识到,如果要充分了解重要决策,知道如何收集和反思数据至关重要。这篇文章利用研究和学术写作来解释这四个价值观,描述该工具的开发及其试点研究,并利用一所样本学校的研究结果提出对话的结果,该学校的工作人员完成了该工具。对该文书及其使用提出的修改建议是该条的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Storying family experiences in higher education: Surfacing, awakening, and transforming developing leader identity Culturally responsive policy development: Co-constructing assessment and reporting practices with First Nation educators in Alberta Cowboy epistemology: Rural school and district leadership for diversity and social justice Breaking through the glass ceiling: Experiences of academic women who have advanced to leadership roles in tertiary education in New Zealand Changing and challenging dimensions of principal autonomy in South Australia: A lived experience phenomenological analysis of the courage to care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1