Environmental sustainability and management theory development: Post-paradigm insights from the Anthropocene

IF 3.4 3区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT European Management Review Pub Date : 2023-03-22 DOI:10.1111/emre.12567
Christian William Callaghan, Andrew Mitchell
{"title":"Environmental sustainability and management theory development: Post-paradigm insights from the Anthropocene","authors":"Christian William Callaghan,&nbsp;Andrew Mitchell","doi":"10.1111/emre.12567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Given a looming crisis of environmental degradation, this conceptual review revisits certain long-standing assumptions informing the development of management theory. Specifically, we problematise seminal notions of paradigm differentiation at the heart of Burrell and Morgan's theory of paradigms by arguing that assumptions of paradigm incommensurability amount to abdication of a responsibility to consider cross-cutting existential imperatives. In developing the concept of epistemological panarchy, we build on some ideas of stakeholder theory to suggest a research agenda concerned with developing an improved meta-epistemology aligned with concerns of environmental sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":47372,"journal":{"name":"European Management Review","volume":"21 3","pages":"520-532"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emre.12567","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emre.12567","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given a looming crisis of environmental degradation, this conceptual review revisits certain long-standing assumptions informing the development of management theory. Specifically, we problematise seminal notions of paradigm differentiation at the heart of Burrell and Morgan's theory of paradigms by arguing that assumptions of paradigm incommensurability amount to abdication of a responsibility to consider cross-cutting existential imperatives. In developing the concept of epistemological panarchy, we build on some ideas of stakeholder theory to suggest a research agenda concerned with developing an improved meta-epistemology aligned with concerns of environmental sustainability.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境可持续性与管理理论发展:人类世的后范式视角
鉴于迫在眉睫的环境退化危机,这篇概念评论重新审视了长期以来影响管理理论发展的某些假设。具体而言,我们对伯雷尔和摩根的范式理论核心--范式分化的开创性概念提出质疑,认为范式不可通约的假设等同于放弃考虑贯穿各领域的存在必要性的责任。在发展认识论泛结构概念的过程中,我们以利益相关者理论的一些观点为基础,提出了一个研究议程,涉及发展一种与环境可持续性问题相一致的改进的元认识论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The European Management Review is an international journal dedicated to advancing the understanding of management in private and public sector organizations through empirical investigation and theoretical analysis. The European Management Review provides an international forum for dialogue between researchers, thereby improving the understanding of the nature of management in different settings and promoting the transfer of research results to management practice. Although one of the European Management Review"s aims is to foster the general advancement of management scholarship among European scholars and/or those academics interested in European management issues.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The theory of the MNE@64: Building on Hymer's legacy Hymer and the theory of the MNE: A commentary by John Cantwell Hymer and the theory of the MNE: A commentary by Niels Noorderhaven Buying knowledge-intensive business services: Overarching themes, actor relationships, and future research agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1