Impact of Mechanical Ventilation and Renal Replacement Therapy on Clinical Outcomes among Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients

Pub Date : 2023-07-07 DOI:10.3390/reports6030031
A. Sindi
{"title":"Impact of Mechanical Ventilation and Renal Replacement Therapy on Clinical Outcomes among Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients","authors":"A. Sindi","doi":"10.3390/reports6030031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Poor clinical outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19 occur due to many factors that require elucidation. The objective of this study was to describe the outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19 and identify the risk factors for mortality. Materials and Methods: The study was a single-centered cross-sectional, observational study involving COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs) of a tertiary care hospital in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. The patients were admitted between 1 March and 31 December 2020. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for mortality. Results: Of 107 patients admitted, 98 (91.6%) were ≥40 years old and 84 (78.5%) were males. The mean oxygen saturation at admission was 79.6 ± 12.6%, the duration of ICU stay was 13.0 ± 11.6 days, and 65 (60.7%) of the patients received mechanical ventilation. Major comorbidities included hypertension (57%), diabetes (56%), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (15.5%). The overall mortality rate was 51.4%; this was higher in patients who received mechanical ventilation (60 vs. 38.1%; p = 0.03) and those with co-morbid hypertension (60.7 vs. 39.1%; p = 0.03). Risk factors for mortality were: need for mechanical ventilation agent of record adjusted Odds ratio (aOR) 4.4 (1.6–12.6), co-morbid hypertension aOR 5.8 (1.6–21.1), having CKD aOR 5.4 (1.2–25.6) and receiving renal replacement therapy aOR 4.3 (1.4–13.0). Conclusions: The use of mechanical ventilation or renal replacement therapy among critically ill COVID-19 patients could potentially predict worse outcomes. Patients with existing hypertension or CKD may carry a higher mortality risk.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/reports6030031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Poor clinical outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19 occur due to many factors that require elucidation. The objective of this study was to describe the outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19 and identify the risk factors for mortality. Materials and Methods: The study was a single-centered cross-sectional, observational study involving COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs) of a tertiary care hospital in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. The patients were admitted between 1 March and 31 December 2020. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for mortality. Results: Of 107 patients admitted, 98 (91.6%) were ≥40 years old and 84 (78.5%) were males. The mean oxygen saturation at admission was 79.6 ± 12.6%, the duration of ICU stay was 13.0 ± 11.6 days, and 65 (60.7%) of the patients received mechanical ventilation. Major comorbidities included hypertension (57%), diabetes (56%), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (15.5%). The overall mortality rate was 51.4%; this was higher in patients who received mechanical ventilation (60 vs. 38.1%; p = 0.03) and those with co-morbid hypertension (60.7 vs. 39.1%; p = 0.03). Risk factors for mortality were: need for mechanical ventilation agent of record adjusted Odds ratio (aOR) 4.4 (1.6–12.6), co-morbid hypertension aOR 5.8 (1.6–21.1), having CKD aOR 5.4 (1.2–25.6) and receiving renal replacement therapy aOR 4.3 (1.4–13.0). Conclusions: The use of mechanical ventilation or renal replacement therapy among critically ill COVID-19 patients could potentially predict worse outcomes. Patients with existing hypertension or CKD may carry a higher mortality risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
机械通气和肾脏替代治疗对危重新冠肺炎患者临床结局的影响
背景:严重新冠肺炎患者的临床结果不佳是由于许多需要阐明的因素造成的。本研究的目的是描述新冠肺炎危重患者的结局,并确定死亡率的危险因素。材料和方法:该研究是一项单中心的横断面观察性研究,涉及中东和北非地区一家三级护理医院重症监护室(ICU)的新冠肺炎患者。患者于2020年3月1日至12月31日期间入院。Logistic回归分析用于确定死亡率的危险因素。结果:107例患者中,≥40岁者98例(91.6%),男性84例(78.5%)。入院时的平均血氧饱和度为79.6±12.6%,ICU住院时间为13.0±11.6天,65名(60.7%)患者接受了机械通气。主要合并症包括高血压(57%)、糖尿病(56%)和慢性肾脏病(15.5%),总死亡率为51.4%;接受机械通气的患者(60 vs.38.1%;p=0.03)和合并高血压的患者(60.7 vs.39.1%;p=0.03)的死亡率更高。死亡的危险因素是:需要记录调整比值比(aOR)4.4(1.6-12.6)的机械通气剂,合并高血压aOR 5.8(1.6-21.1),患有CKD aOR 5.4(1.2–25.6)和接受肾脏替代治疗aOR 4.3(1.4–13.0)。结论:在危重新冠肺炎患者中使用机械通气或肾脏替代治疗可能会预测更糟糕的结果。患有高血压或CKD的患者可能具有更高的死亡风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1