Evaluating the need for secured bicycle parking across cyclist typologies

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES International Journal of Sustainable Transportation Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1080/15568318.2023.2166438
Juliette Fournier , Mathilde Van Liefferinge , Léa Ravensbergen , James DeWeese , Ahmed El-Geneidy
{"title":"Evaluating the need for secured bicycle parking across cyclist typologies","authors":"Juliette Fournier ,&nbsp;Mathilde Van Liefferinge ,&nbsp;Léa Ravensbergen ,&nbsp;James DeWeese ,&nbsp;Ahmed El-Geneidy","doi":"10.1080/15568318.2023.2166438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Concerns about bicycle theft can act as a barrier to cycling uptake. A promising solution to prevent theft is secured bicycle parking, which offers more protection than regular on-street bicycle racks through secured access, or the presence of an attendant. As cities begin to invest in this infrastructure, practitioners must make difficult decisions about which types of facilities to install, where to install them, and how much to charge for their use. Therefore, this study draws on a large-scale cycling survey (n = 1806) distributed in Montréal, Canada to explore how secured bicycle parking needs vary across different cyclist typologies. To do so, factor-cluster analysis was conducted to generate cyclist typologies. Then the behaviors and secured bicycle parking needs of these different cyclists were established. Four distinct cyclist types emerged: Leisure Cyclists, Summer Cyclists, Occasional Cyclists, and Dedicated Cyclists. Dedicated cyclists were most interested in secured bicycle parking, while occasional cyclists were the least. Leisure cyclists, on the other hand, are willing to pay and walk the most for secured bicycle parking. Across typologies, the top three most important characteristics of secured bicycle parking are (1) being free or low cost, (2) having secured access, and (3) being close to their destination. Respondents are most interested in secured bicycle parking near their work and metro stations. The results from this study can inform practitioners and researchers about the secured bicycle parking needs of different types of cyclists, and in doing so help in the planning for such facilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47824,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Transportation","volume":"17 12","pages":"Pages 1278-1286"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainable Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1556831823000369","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Concerns about bicycle theft can act as a barrier to cycling uptake. A promising solution to prevent theft is secured bicycle parking, which offers more protection than regular on-street bicycle racks through secured access, or the presence of an attendant. As cities begin to invest in this infrastructure, practitioners must make difficult decisions about which types of facilities to install, where to install them, and how much to charge for their use. Therefore, this study draws on a large-scale cycling survey (n = 1806) distributed in Montréal, Canada to explore how secured bicycle parking needs vary across different cyclist typologies. To do so, factor-cluster analysis was conducted to generate cyclist typologies. Then the behaviors and secured bicycle parking needs of these different cyclists were established. Four distinct cyclist types emerged: Leisure Cyclists, Summer Cyclists, Occasional Cyclists, and Dedicated Cyclists. Dedicated cyclists were most interested in secured bicycle parking, while occasional cyclists were the least. Leisure cyclists, on the other hand, are willing to pay and walk the most for secured bicycle parking. Across typologies, the top three most important characteristics of secured bicycle parking are (1) being free or low cost, (2) having secured access, and (3) being close to their destination. Respondents are most interested in secured bicycle parking near their work and metro stations. The results from this study can inform practitioners and researchers about the secured bicycle parking needs of different types of cyclists, and in doing so help in the planning for such facilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估不同类型骑行者对安全自行车停放的需求
对自行车被盗的担忧可能成为骑自行车的障碍。一个很有希望的防止盗窃的解决方案是安全的自行车停放,通过安全的通道或管理员的存在,它比普通的街道自行车停放架提供更多的保护。当城市开始投资这些基础设施时,从业者必须做出艰难的决定,即安装哪种类型的设施,安装在哪里,以及收取多少费用。因此,本研究采用了一项分布在加拿大montracimal的大规模自行车调查(n = 1806)来探讨不同类型的自行车骑行者对安全自行车停放需求的差异。为此,进行了因子聚类分析以生成骑自行车者的类型。然后建立不同骑自行车者的行为和安全停放自行车的需求。出现了四种不同的骑自行车者类型:休闲骑自行车者、夏季骑自行车者、偶尔骑自行车者和专门骑自行车者。专门骑自行车的人对安全的自行车停放最感兴趣,而偶尔骑自行车的人最不感兴趣。另一方面,休闲骑自行车的人更愿意为安全的自行车停车场付费和步行。在各种类型中,安全自行车停放的前三个最重要的特征是:(1)免费或低成本,(2)有安全的通道,(3)靠近目的地。受访者最感兴趣的是在他们的工作地点和地铁站附近有安全的自行车停放处。本研究的结果可以告知从业人员和研究人员关于不同类型的骑自行车者的安全停车需求,并在这样做有助于此类设施的规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sustainable Transportation provides a discussion forum for the exchange of new and innovative ideas on sustainable transportation research in the context of environmental, economical, social, and engineering aspects, as well as current and future interactions of transportation systems and other urban subsystems. The scope includes the examination of overall sustainability of any transportation system, including its infrastructure, vehicle, operation, and maintenance; the integration of social science disciplines, engineering, and information technology with transportation; the understanding of the comparative aspects of different transportation systems from a global perspective; qualitative and quantitative transportation studies; and case studies, surveys, and expository papers in an international or local context. Equal emphasis is placed on the problems of sustainable transportation that are associated with passenger and freight transportation modes in both industrialized and non-industrialized areas. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial evaluation by the Editors and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert reviewers. All peer review is single-blind. Submissions are made online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
期刊最新文献
Can E-scooters connect first and last-mile of public rail transit? Lessons learned from intercept user survey in Utah How (not) to incentivize sustainable mobility? Lessons from a swiss mobility competition The role of the new ecological paradigm scale on the willingness to pay and willingness to wait for e-commerce deliveries Consumers’ attitudes toward benefits and drawbacks of vehicle-to-grid technology: An agent-based model Optimal allocation of electric vehicle charging station integrated with distributed generation using adaptive luminescence moth optimization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1