Reflexão sobre a Constitucionalidade da Mediação Pré-processual Obrigatória

Maria Jerónimo
{"title":"Reflexão sobre a Constitucionalidade da Mediação Pré-processual Obrigatória","authors":"Maria Jerónimo","doi":"10.24840/2182-9845_2018-0002_0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"portuguesA mediacao pre-processual obrigatoria suscita varios problemas juridicos, nomeadamente quando posta em confronto com o direito fundamental de acesso aos tribunais. Com efeito, alguns ordenamentos juridicos elevaram-na a pressuposto processual, exigindo as partes o recurso a este meio de resolucao alternativa de litigios antes da instauracao da devida acao judicial. O principal problema surge se considerarmos que ela pode afastar a possibilidade de os cidadaos recorrerem aos tribunais como forma desolucionar os seus problemas, o que consubstanciaria uma inconstitucionalidade. E, entao, necessario ponderar se um tal sistema se adequa as exigencias constitucionais de acesso a justica EnglishPre-litigation compulsory mediation raises several legal issues, especially when confronted with the fundamental right of access to the courts. In fact, some legal systems have elevated it to the rank of a procedural premise, requiring the parties to solve their problems through this alternative dispute resolution mechanism before initiating a court proceeding. However, the main problem arises if we consider that it can rule out the possibility of citizens to appeal to the courts as a way of solving their problems, which would contravene the Portuguese Constitution. Thus, it is necessary to consider whether such a system fits the Portuguese constitutional requirements of access to justice","PeriodicalId":40129,"journal":{"name":"RED-Revista Electronica de Direito","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RED-Revista Electronica de Direito","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24840/2182-9845_2018-0002_0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

portuguesA mediacao pre-processual obrigatoria suscita varios problemas juridicos, nomeadamente quando posta em confronto com o direito fundamental de acesso aos tribunais. Com efeito, alguns ordenamentos juridicos elevaram-na a pressuposto processual, exigindo as partes o recurso a este meio de resolucao alternativa de litigios antes da instauracao da devida acao judicial. O principal problema surge se considerarmos que ela pode afastar a possibilidade de os cidadaos recorrerem aos tribunais como forma desolucionar os seus problemas, o que consubstanciaria uma inconstitucionalidade. E, entao, necessario ponderar se um tal sistema se adequa as exigencias constitucionais de acesso a justica EnglishPre-litigation compulsory mediation raises several legal issues, especially when confronted with the fundamental right of access to the courts. In fact, some legal systems have elevated it to the rank of a procedural premise, requiring the parties to solve their problems through this alternative dispute resolution mechanism before initiating a court proceeding. However, the main problem arises if we consider that it can rule out the possibility of citizens to appeal to the courts as a way of solving their problems, which would contravene the Portuguese Constitution. Thus, it is necessary to consider whether such a system fits the Portuguese constitutional requirements of access to justice
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于强制程序前调解合宪性的思考
葡萄牙强制性程序前调解提出了几个法律问题,即在面临诉诸法院的基本权利时。事实上,一些法律制度已将其提高为一项程序性要求,要求当事方在采取适当的司法行动之前采用这种替代性争端解决手段。如果我们认为这可以排除公民向法院寻求解决问题的可能性,那么主要问题就会出现,这将构成违宪。诉讼前强制调解引发了一些法律问题,尤其是在涉及诉诸法院的基本权利时。事实上,一些法律制度已将其提升为程序性前提,要求当事人在启动法院程序之前通过这种替代性纠纷解决机制解决问题。然而,如果我们认为这可以排除公民向法院上诉以解决他们的问题的可能性,那么主要问题就会出现,这将违反葡萄牙宪法。因此,有必要考虑这种制度是否符合葡萄牙宪法对诉诸司法的要求
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Press publishers' rights in the Digital Age: Challenges and opportunities for legal and policy frameworks Os contratos eletrónicos B2C Revisitando o tema da conversão do contrato a termo no emprego público: o acórdão do Supremo Tribunal Administrativo, de 8.09.2022 Deveres de Informação e Proteção do Consumidor Inteligência Artificial. Quadro jurídico e reflexões sobre a Proposta de Regulamento de Inteligência Artificial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1