Psychological distress in Afghan journalists: a descriptive study

IF 0.7 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research Pub Date : 2020-06-13 DOI:10.1108/jacpr-02-2020-0473
Jonas Osmann, Abdul Mujeeb Khalvatgar, A. Feinstein
{"title":"Psychological distress in Afghan journalists: a descriptive study","authors":"Jonas Osmann, Abdul Mujeeb Khalvatgar, A. Feinstein","doi":"10.1108/jacpr-02-2020-0473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Afghanistan is one of the world’s most dangerous places for journalists. There are, however, no data on the mental health of Afghan journalists covering conflict in their country. The study aims to determine the degree to which Afghan journalists are exposed to traumatic events, their perceptions of organizational support, their rates of symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression, their utilization of mental health services and the effectiveness of the treatment received.,The entire study was undertaken in Dari (Farsi). Five major Afghan news organizations representing 104 journalists took part of whom 71 (68%) completed a simple eleven-point analog scale rating perceptions of organizational support. Symptoms of PTSD and depression were recorded with the Impact of Event Scale – Revised (IES-R) and the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), respectively. Behavioral comparisons were undertaken between those journalists who had and had not received mental health therapy.,The majority of journalists exceeded cutoff scores for PTSD and major depression and reported high rates for exposure to traumatic events. There were no significant differences in IES-R and CES-D scores between journalists who had and had not received mental health therapy. Most journalists did not view their employers as supportive.,To the best of authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to collect empirical data on the mental health of Afghan journalists. The results highlight the extreme stressors confronted by them, their correspondingly high levels of psychopathology and the relative ineffectiveness of mental health therapy given to a minority of those in distress. The implications of these findings are discussed.","PeriodicalId":45499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"115-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/jacpr-02-2020-0473","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jacpr-02-2020-0473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Afghanistan is one of the world’s most dangerous places for journalists. There are, however, no data on the mental health of Afghan journalists covering conflict in their country. The study aims to determine the degree to which Afghan journalists are exposed to traumatic events, their perceptions of organizational support, their rates of symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression, their utilization of mental health services and the effectiveness of the treatment received.,The entire study was undertaken in Dari (Farsi). Five major Afghan news organizations representing 104 journalists took part of whom 71 (68%) completed a simple eleven-point analog scale rating perceptions of organizational support. Symptoms of PTSD and depression were recorded with the Impact of Event Scale – Revised (IES-R) and the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), respectively. Behavioral comparisons were undertaken between those journalists who had and had not received mental health therapy.,The majority of journalists exceeded cutoff scores for PTSD and major depression and reported high rates for exposure to traumatic events. There were no significant differences in IES-R and CES-D scores between journalists who had and had not received mental health therapy. Most journalists did not view their employers as supportive.,To the best of authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to collect empirical data on the mental health of Afghan journalists. The results highlight the extreme stressors confronted by them, their correspondingly high levels of psychopathology and the relative ineffectiveness of mental health therapy given to a minority of those in distress. The implications of these findings are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿富汗记者的心理困扰:一项描述性研究
阿富汗是世界上对记者来说最危险的地方之一。然而,没有关于报道阿富汗冲突的阿富汗记者心理健康的数据。这项研究旨在确定阿富汗记者接触创伤事件的程度、他们对组织支持的看法、他们出现创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和抑郁症状的比率、他们对心理健康服务的利用率以及所接受治疗的有效性。,整个研究是用达里语(波斯语)进行的。代表104名记者的五家阿富汗主要新闻机构参加了会议,其中71家(68%)完成了对组织支持的简单11点模拟量表评级。PTSD和抑郁症的症状分别用事件影响量表(IES-R)和流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)记录。对接受过和未接受心理健康治疗的记者进行了行为比较。,大多数记者超过了创伤后应激障碍和严重抑郁症的临界分数,并报告了接触创伤事件的高比率。接受和未接受心理健康治疗的记者在IES-R和CES-D评分方面没有显著差异。大多数记者并不认为他们的雇主是支持他们的。,据作者所知,这是第一项收集阿富汗记者心理健康实证数据的研究。研究结果突出了他们面临的极端压力源,他们相应的高精神病理学水平,以及为少数处于困境的人提供的心理健康治疗相对无效。讨论了这些发现的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Why do they decide to stay? Experience of Indian women surviving intimate partner violence Invited commentary on using music intervention and imagined interaction to deal with aggression and conflict The appreciation of the collaboration agreements used to prevent intrafamilial homicides State responses to herder–farmers conflict and peace-building in rural grazing areas of Nigeria To stay silent or to blow the whistle? Bystander’s intervening acts when witnessing intimate partner violence (IPV)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1