Cerebroplacental blood flow redistribution in monochorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancies with selective fetal growth restriction

Lan Zhang, Hongli Liu, Jie Gan, Xing Wang, Shuai Huang, Junnan Li, H. Qi, Li Wen
{"title":"Cerebroplacental blood flow redistribution in monochorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancies with selective fetal growth restriction","authors":"Lan Zhang, Hongli Liu, Jie Gan, Xing Wang, Shuai Huang, Junnan Li, H. Qi, Li Wen","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4477.2019.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo analyze the cerebroplacental blood flow distribution characteristics in monochorionic-diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies with selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR), and investigate the relationship between co-twin cerebroplacental blood flow discordances and co-twin birth weight discordances (BWdisc). \n \n \nMethods \nThe cerebroplacental blood flow distribution characteristics and their discordances were analyzed retrospectively in 52 MCDA twin pregnancies with normal growth (control group) and 52 with sFGR (case group), including the umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI), middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity (MCA-PSV), middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MCA-PI), cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), and their discordances (UA-PIdisc, MCA-PSVdisc, MCA-PIdisc and CPRdisc). \n \n \nResults \nCompared to the control group, UA-PIdisc, MCA-PIdisc and CPRdisc increased significantly (all P<0.01). UA-PIdisc, MCA-PIdisc and CPRdisc were related positively to BWdisc as shown by correlation analyses (r=0.488, 0.414, 0.592; all P<0.001), and they had moderate predictive accuracy for sFGR with area under the curves of 0.743, 0.662 and 0.778, with sensitivity of 48.08%, 67.31% and 71.15%, and specificity of 92.31%, 59.62% and 78.85% (all P<0.01). Multivariate Logistic regression analyses showed that only CPRdisc were independently associated with sFGR (P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nMore cerebroplacental blood flow discordances are observed in MCDA twin pregnancies with sFGR. Co-twin cerebroplacental blood flow discordance is related to BWdisc. \n \n \nKey words: \nUltrasonography; Monochorionic-diamniotic twin; Selective growth restriction; Cerebroplacental ratio","PeriodicalId":10224,"journal":{"name":"中华超声影像学杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华超声影像学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4477.2019.10.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To analyze the cerebroplacental blood flow distribution characteristics in monochorionic-diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies with selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR), and investigate the relationship between co-twin cerebroplacental blood flow discordances and co-twin birth weight discordances (BWdisc). Methods The cerebroplacental blood flow distribution characteristics and their discordances were analyzed retrospectively in 52 MCDA twin pregnancies with normal growth (control group) and 52 with sFGR (case group), including the umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI), middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity (MCA-PSV), middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MCA-PI), cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), and their discordances (UA-PIdisc, MCA-PSVdisc, MCA-PIdisc and CPRdisc). Results Compared to the control group, UA-PIdisc, MCA-PIdisc and CPRdisc increased significantly (all P<0.01). UA-PIdisc, MCA-PIdisc and CPRdisc were related positively to BWdisc as shown by correlation analyses (r=0.488, 0.414, 0.592; all P<0.001), and they had moderate predictive accuracy for sFGR with area under the curves of 0.743, 0.662 and 0.778, with sensitivity of 48.08%, 67.31% and 71.15%, and specificity of 92.31%, 59.62% and 78.85% (all P<0.01). Multivariate Logistic regression analyses showed that only CPRdisc were independently associated with sFGR (P<0.05). Conclusions More cerebroplacental blood flow discordances are observed in MCDA twin pregnancies with sFGR. Co-twin cerebroplacental blood flow discordance is related to BWdisc. Key words: Ultrasonography; Monochorionic-diamniotic twin; Selective growth restriction; Cerebroplacental ratio
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择性胎儿生长受限单绒毛膜双羊膜双胎妊娠的脑胎盘血流再分布
目的分析选择性胎儿生长受限(sFGR)单绒毛膜双羊膜(MCDA)双胎妊娠的脑胎盘血流分布特征,探讨双胎脑胎盘血流不一致与双胎出生体重不一致(BWdisc)的关系。方法回顾性分析52例生长正常的MCDA双胎妊娠(对照组)和52例sFGR双胎妊娠(病例组)的脑胎盘血流分布特征及其不一致之处,包括脐动脉脉搏指数(UA-PI)、大脑中动脉收缩峰值速度(MCA-PSV)、大脑中动脉脉搏指数(MCA-PI)、脑胎盘比(CPR)及其不一致之处(UA-PIdisc、MCA-PSVdisc、MCA-PIdisc和CPRdisc)。结果与对照组比较,UA-PIdisc、MCA-PIdisc、CPRdisc均显著升高(P<0.01)。相关性分析显示,UA-PIdisc、MCA-PIdisc和CPRdisc与BWdisc呈正相关(r=0.488、0.414、0.592;曲线下面积分别为0.743、0.662和0.778,敏感性分别为48.08%、67.31%和71.15%,特异性分别为92.31%、59.62%和78.85% (P均<0.01)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,只有CPRdisc与sFGR独立相关(P<0.05)。结论MCDA双胎合并sFGR存在更多的脑胎盘血流不一致。双胎脑胎盘血流失调与BWdisc有关。关键词:超声检查;Monochorionic-diamniotic双胞胎;选择性生长限制;Cerebroplacental比率
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华超声影像学杂志
中华超声影像学杂志 Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9126
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound-guided pathological sampling of cadaver lung tissue in cases of COVID-19 Ultrasound-guided post-mortem tissue sampling in the autopsy of COVID-19 cases: a pilot study The clinical value of ultrasound in the assessment of the severity of COVID-19 Study of positioning of fetal conus medullaris by detecting atlanto-axial intervertebral space with three-dimensional ultrasound Prenatal ultrasound diagnostic clues of congenital dislocation of the knee
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1