REDRESSIVE ACTIONS FOLLOWING COMMISERATIONS IN ONLINE DISCUSSIONS

IF 0.1 4区 文学 Q3 HISTORY Verbum Pub Date : 2018-01-19 DOI:10.15388/VERB.2017.8.11327
Petra Trávníková
{"title":"REDRESSIVE ACTIONS FOLLOWING COMMISERATIONS IN ONLINE DISCUSSIONS","authors":"Petra Trávníková","doi":"10.15388/VERB.2017.8.11327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Brown and Levinson’s (1978) seminal classification of positive politeness strategies, commiserating is listed in the subgroup referred to as human-relations wants. The qualitative and quantitative ana­lysis of a corpus consisting of five Internet discussion boards has shown that it is also one of the most frequent positive politeness strategies used there. All the threads under examination are dedicated to the so-called women’s topics, such as dieting, pregnancy, infertility or mothering. The members of these close-knit communities formed upon the boards find it necessary to express sympathy in order to enhance each other’s (positive) face and avoid face-threatening acts arising from the sensitive nature of these topics. However, the analysis of the corpus has also revealed that to commiserate merely by saying they are sorry is not enough. The interlocutors find it necessary to add often complex redressi­ve actions to boost the illocutionary force of their statements. Thus the aim of the paper is to explore the formulaic character of commiserations and categorise the numerous redressive actions following them, taking into account their two main functions, i.e. building rapport and facilitating smooth communication within online communities.","PeriodicalId":42449,"journal":{"name":"Verbum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Verbum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/VERB.2017.8.11327","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Brown and Levinson’s (1978) seminal classification of positive politeness strategies, commiserating is listed in the subgroup referred to as human-relations wants. The qualitative and quantitative ana­lysis of a corpus consisting of five Internet discussion boards has shown that it is also one of the most frequent positive politeness strategies used there. All the threads under examination are dedicated to the so-called women’s topics, such as dieting, pregnancy, infertility or mothering. The members of these close-knit communities formed upon the boards find it necessary to express sympathy in order to enhance each other’s (positive) face and avoid face-threatening acts arising from the sensitive nature of these topics. However, the analysis of the corpus has also revealed that to commiserate merely by saying they are sorry is not enough. The interlocutors find it necessary to add often complex redressi­ve actions to boost the illocutionary force of their statements. Thus the aim of the paper is to explore the formulaic character of commiserations and categorise the numerous redressive actions following them, taking into account their two main functions, i.e. building rapport and facilitating smooth communication within online communities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在网上讨论中表示同情后采取镇压行动
在Brown和Levinson(1978)对积极礼貌策略的开创性分类中,同情被列在称为人际关系需求的子组中。通过对5个网络讨论区语料库的定性和定量分析表明,这也是最常用的积极礼貌策略之一。所有被审查的帖子都是关于所谓的女性话题,比如节食、怀孕、不孕或育儿。这些由董事会组成的紧密联系的社区的成员发现有必要表达同情,以增强彼此的(积极)面孔,避免因这些话题的敏感性而产生的威胁面孔的行为。然而,对语料库的分析也表明,仅仅说对不起是不够的。对话者发现有必要经常添加复杂的补救行动来增强其陈述的言外之力。因此,本文的目的是探讨同情的公式化特征,并对随之而来的众多镇压行动进行分类,同时考虑到它们的两个主要功能,即建立关系和促进在线社区内的顺畅沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Verbum
Verbum Multiple-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Les pragmatèmes de politesse dans le manuel du français de niveau élémentaire « Edito A1 » Des premières priorités, un hasard imprévu, applaudir des deux mains, découvrir pour la première fois … ou des phrasèmes pléonastiques en français et en polonais contemporains Prompting Metalinguistic Awareness in Large Language Models: ChatGPT and Bias Effects on the Grammar of Italian and Italian Varieties Lietuviškojo tapatumo apraiškos grįžusių iš užsienio vaikų sakytinės kalbos tekstyne A TRAJETÓRIA DA LITERATURA DE CORDEL NO BRASIL:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1