Components of Teacher Self-Efficacy for Literacy Instruction for In-Service Educators in Two Southeastern School Districts

IF 1.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Reading Psychology Pub Date : 2023-06-12 DOI:10.1080/02702711.2023.2222112
J. Schwab, R. A. Griffin, J. Allen, B. Scullin, T. Ogletree
{"title":"Components of Teacher Self-Efficacy for Literacy Instruction for In-Service Educators in Two Southeastern School Districts","authors":"J. Schwab, R. A. Griffin, J. Allen, B. Scullin, T. Ogletree","doi":"10.1080/02702711.2023.2222112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Researchers administered a teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for literacy instruction (TSELI) survey to in-service teachers (N = 168) in two PK–12 school districts in the southeastern U.S. A principal components analysis indicated four components for TSELI: (a) Teaching and Modeling Reading, (b) Facilitating and Nurturing Readers, (c) Influencing Literacy Success, and (d) Teaching and Facilitating Writing. The results include a component analysis as well as descriptive data by demographics (i.e., gender, grade level, subject area, educational level, and years of teaching experience). In addition, a MANOVA was performed to determine if there were differences in self-efficacy and demographic variables. Significant differences were found for gender, grade level, and subject area. Most notably, males, secondary educators, and teachers of subjects other than English Language Arts (ELA) exhibited significantly less self-efficacy in literacy instruction. The implications for PK–12 teachers, school leaders, and teacher educators are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46567,"journal":{"name":"Reading Psychology","volume":"44 1","pages":"965 - 985"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2023.2222112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Researchers administered a teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for literacy instruction (TSELI) survey to in-service teachers (N = 168) in two PK–12 school districts in the southeastern U.S. A principal components analysis indicated four components for TSELI: (a) Teaching and Modeling Reading, (b) Facilitating and Nurturing Readers, (c) Influencing Literacy Success, and (d) Teaching and Facilitating Writing. The results include a component analysis as well as descriptive data by demographics (i.e., gender, grade level, subject area, educational level, and years of teaching experience). In addition, a MANOVA was performed to determine if there were differences in self-efficacy and demographic variables. Significant differences were found for gender, grade level, and subject area. Most notably, males, secondary educators, and teachers of subjects other than English Language Arts (ELA) exhibited significantly less self-efficacy in literacy instruction. The implications for PK–12 teachers, school leaders, and teacher educators are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
东南两学区在职教育工作者读写教学自我效能感之成分分析
研究人员对美国东南部两个幼儿园- 12学区的在职教师(168名)进行了识字教学自我效能感(TSELI)调查,主成分分析表明TSELI的四个组成部分:(a)教学和模拟阅读,(b)促进和培养读者,(c)影响识字成功,(d)教学和促进写作。结果包括成分分析以及人口统计学(即性别、年级水平、学科领域、教育水平和教学经验)的描述性数据。此外,进行方差分析以确定自我效能感和人口统计学变量是否存在差异。性别、年级水平和学科领域存在显著差异。最值得注意的是,男性、中学教育工作者和英语语言艺术(ELA)以外学科的教师在读写教学中表现出明显较低的自我效能感。对PK-12教师、学校领导和教师教育者的影响进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reading Psychology
Reading Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Prepared exclusively by professionals, this refereed journal publishes original manuscripts in the fields of literacy, reading, and related psychology disciplines. Articles appear in the form of completed research; practitioner-based "experiential" methods or philosophical statements; teacher and counselor preparation services for guiding all levels of reading skill development, attitudes, and interests; programs or materials; and literary or humorous contributions.
期刊最新文献
Unhinged: Reading Comprehension Tests as Gatekeepers to Teaching The Regularity of High-Frequency Words (Sight Words): Teacher Phonetic Knowledge is Key Investigating the Mechanisms Behind Relations Between Academic Language and Reading Comprehension: The Role of Reading Self-Concept and Reading Enjoyment An Exploration of the Impact of Quality Illustrations in Children’s Picture Books on Preschool Student Narrative Ability Metalinguistic Effects on English Spelling: A Structural Equation Model for Early Literacy Instruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1