Implicit Theories, Social Support, and Hope as Serial Mediators for Predicting Academic Self-Efficacy Among Higher Education Students

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Learning Disability Quarterly Pub Date : 2020-05-22 DOI:10.1177/0731948720918821
Adi Mana, Noa Saka, Orit Dahan, Anat Ben-Simon, M. Margalit
{"title":"Implicit Theories, Social Support, and Hope as Serial Mediators for Predicting Academic Self-Efficacy Among Higher Education Students","authors":"Adi Mana, Noa Saka, Orit Dahan, Anat Ben-Simon, M. Margalit","doi":"10.1177/0731948720918821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the predictive role of learning difficulties in the academic self-efficacy of students enrolled in higher education institutions and the serial multiple mediation of inner and external resources. The sample consisted of 2,113 students (age range = 18–35 years) at 25 higher education institutions in Israel. Participants were divided into four groups: (a) 668 typical students (without learning difficulties or attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder [ADHD]), (b) 370 students with self-reported but undiagnosed academic difficulties, (c) 372 students diagnosed with specific learning disabilities (SLDs), and (d) 703 students diagnosed with attention-deficit disorders (ADHD). Implicit theories on accommodations, perceptions of social support, hope, and academic self-efficacy were examined. Results demonstrated that students with SLD and ADHD had higher beliefs in the value of expectations, yet they experienced lower levels of academic self-efficacy than their typical peers. These implicit theories did not predict directly the academic self-efficacy, but external resources (perceptions of support) and internal resources (hope) mediated these relationships. The results focused on the accommodations and beliefs in their value for predicting academic self-efficacy, and the importance of social support and hope.","PeriodicalId":47365,"journal":{"name":"Learning Disability Quarterly","volume":"45 1","pages":"85 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0731948720918821","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Disability Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948720918821","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

This study examined the predictive role of learning difficulties in the academic self-efficacy of students enrolled in higher education institutions and the serial multiple mediation of inner and external resources. The sample consisted of 2,113 students (age range = 18–35 years) at 25 higher education institutions in Israel. Participants were divided into four groups: (a) 668 typical students (without learning difficulties or attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder [ADHD]), (b) 370 students with self-reported but undiagnosed academic difficulties, (c) 372 students diagnosed with specific learning disabilities (SLDs), and (d) 703 students diagnosed with attention-deficit disorders (ADHD). Implicit theories on accommodations, perceptions of social support, hope, and academic self-efficacy were examined. Results demonstrated that students with SLD and ADHD had higher beliefs in the value of expectations, yet they experienced lower levels of academic self-efficacy than their typical peers. These implicit theories did not predict directly the academic self-efficacy, but external resources (perceptions of support) and internal resources (hope) mediated these relationships. The results focused on the accommodations and beliefs in their value for predicting academic self-efficacy, and the importance of social support and hope.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内隐理论、社会支持和希望对大学生学业自我效能感的影响
本研究考察了学习困难对大学生学业自我效能感的预测作用及内外资源的多重中介作用。样本包括以色列25所高等教育机构的2113名学生(年龄范围为18-35岁)。参与者被分为四组:(a) 668名典型学生(没有学习困难或注意力缺陷多动障碍[ADHD]), (b) 370名自我报告但未诊断出学习困难的学生,(c) 372名被诊断为特殊学习障碍(SLDs)的学生,(d) 703名被诊断为注意力缺陷障碍(ADHD)的学生。内隐理论对适应、社会支持、希望和学术自我效能感的感知进行了检验。结果表明,患有特殊学习障碍和注意力缺陷多动症的学生对期望的价值有更高的信念,但他们的学业自我效能感水平低于典型的同龄人。这些内隐理论不能直接预测学业自我效能感,但外部资源(支持感知)和内部资源(希望)在其中起中介作用。研究结果主要集中在学业自我效能感预测的适应性和信念价值,以及社会支持和希望的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Learning Disability Quarterly publishes high-quality research and scholarship concerning children, youth, and adults with learning disabilities. Consistent with that purpose, the journal seeks to publish articles with the potential to impact and improve educational outcomes, opportunities, and services.
期刊最新文献
Synthesis of Writing Intervention Studies for English Learners With Learning Disabilities Parental Allyship for Children With Dyslexia: A Conceptual Lens on Disability Experience Current Research Informing the Conceptualization of STEM Interventions for Students With LD: An Introduction to the Special Series Teaching Fifth-Grade Students With Specific Learning Disabilities to Explain Their Mathematical Reasoning Through Written Expression Bob’s Productive Task Engagement in Fractional Reasoning: A Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1