Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Use of Health Services among Older Brazilian Adults according to Frailty: Evidence from the Fibra Study

IF 1 Q4 GERONTOLOGY Ageing International Pub Date : 2022-03-25 DOI:10.1007/s12126-022-09489-3
Juliana Lustosa Torres, Leani Souza Máximo Pereira, Anita Liberalesso Neri, Eduardo Ferrioli, Roberto Alves Lourenço, Silvia Lanziotti Azevedo da Silva
{"title":"Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Use of Health Services among Older Brazilian Adults according to Frailty: Evidence from the Fibra Study","authors":"Juliana Lustosa Torres,&nbsp;Leani Souza Máximo Pereira,&nbsp;Anita Liberalesso Neri,&nbsp;Eduardo Ferrioli,&nbsp;Roberto Alves Lourenço,&nbsp;Silvia Lanziotti Azevedo da Silva","doi":"10.1007/s12126-022-09489-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Physical frailty has been described as a complex geriatric syndrome. Independent of frailty, older people have been showing an increased health care services utilization. The objective is to assess an interaction effect between frailty and education on the association with the use of health services in community-dwelling older Brazilians. This is a cross-sectional study. The study was conducted with community-dwelling older Brazilian individuals. The sample had 5,473 older adults derived from the FIBRA Study. The definition of frailty was made using the physical frailty phenotype. The level of education was assessed by complete years of schooling. The use of health services was assessed by the occurrence of hospitalization, for individuals receiving home visits and having attended four or more medical consults in the past 12 months. The robust Poisson regression model with a robust error variance was used to estimate the prevalence ratio (PR) and its 95% confidence intervals to set the association between frailty and use of health services, considering the interaction between frailty and education in final model. Considering all sample, 16.4% were hospitalized, 14.1% received home visits, and 48.2% attended four or more medical consults. The interaction term between frailty and education was statistically significant only for hospitalization, showing a higher prevalence of health services utilization among pre-frail (PR1.68 95% CI 1.15–2.47) and frail (PR1.77 95% CI 1.08–2.90) older individuals with low education compared to non-frail highly educated peers. Low-educated and frail older people were more likely to be hospitalized and should be carefully looked after by health professionals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51665,"journal":{"name":"Ageing International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ageing International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12126-022-09489-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Physical frailty has been described as a complex geriatric syndrome. Independent of frailty, older people have been showing an increased health care services utilization. The objective is to assess an interaction effect between frailty and education on the association with the use of health services in community-dwelling older Brazilians. This is a cross-sectional study. The study was conducted with community-dwelling older Brazilian individuals. The sample had 5,473 older adults derived from the FIBRA Study. The definition of frailty was made using the physical frailty phenotype. The level of education was assessed by complete years of schooling. The use of health services was assessed by the occurrence of hospitalization, for individuals receiving home visits and having attended four or more medical consults in the past 12 months. The robust Poisson regression model with a robust error variance was used to estimate the prevalence ratio (PR) and its 95% confidence intervals to set the association between frailty and use of health services, considering the interaction between frailty and education in final model. Considering all sample, 16.4% were hospitalized, 14.1% received home visits, and 48.2% attended four or more medical consults. The interaction term between frailty and education was statistically significant only for hospitalization, showing a higher prevalence of health services utilization among pre-frail (PR1.68 95% CI 1.15–2.47) and frail (PR1.77 95% CI 1.08–2.90) older individuals with low education compared to non-frail highly educated peers. Low-educated and frail older people were more likely to be hospitalized and should be carefully looked after by health professionals.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西老年人在使用医疗服务方面的社会经济不平等——来自Fibra研究的证据
身体虚弱被认为是一种复杂的老年综合症。与身体虚弱无关,老年人对医疗保健服务的利用一直在增加。目的是评估虚弱和教育之间的相互作用对社区居住的巴西老年人使用保健服务的影响。这是一项横断面研究。这项研究是在社区居住的巴西老年人中进行的。样本有5473名来自FIBRA研究的老年人。虚弱的定义是用物理虚弱表型来定义的。教育水平是通过受教育年限来评估的。对保健服务的使用情况进行评估的是住院的发生情况,即在过去12个月内接受家访和接受4次或4次以上医疗咨询的个人。采用具有稳健误差方差的稳健泊松回归模型来估计患病率(PR)及其95%置信区间,以设置脆弱性与卫生服务使用之间的关联,并在最终模型中考虑脆弱性与教育之间的相互作用。在所有样本中,16.4%的人住院,14.1%的人接受了家访,48.2%的人接受了四次或四次以上的医疗咨询。虚弱和受教育程度之间的相互作用项仅在住院方面具有统计学意义,表明与非虚弱的受过高等教育的同龄人相比,受教育程度低的身体虚弱(PR1.68 95% CI 1.15-2.47)和身体虚弱(PR1.77 95% CI 1.08-2.90)的老年人中健康服务使用率更高。受教育程度低和身体虚弱的老年人更有可能住院,应由卫生专业人员仔细照顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ageing International
Ageing International GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: As a quarterly peer-reviewed journal that has existed for over three decades, Ageing International serves all professionals who deal with complex ageing issues. The journal is dedicated to improving the life of ageing populations worldwide through providing an intellectual forum for communicating common concerns, exchanging analyses and discoveries in scientific research, crystallizing significant issues, and offering recommendations in ageing-related service delivery and policy making. Besides encouraging the submission of high-quality research and review papers, Ageing International seeks to bring together researchers, policy analysts, and service program administrators who are committed to reducing the ''implementation gap'' between good science and effective service, between evidence-based protocol and culturally suitable programs, and between unique innovative solutions and generalizable policies. For significant issues that are common across countries, Ageing International will organize special forums for scholars and investigators from different disciplines to present their regional perspectives as well as to provide more comprehensive analysis. The editors strongly believe that such discourse has the potential to foster a wide range of coordinated efforts that will lead to improvements in the quality of life of older persons worldwide. Abstracted and Indexed in: ABI/INFORM, Academic OneFile, Academic Search, CSA/Proquest, Current Abstracts, EBSCO, Ergonomics Abstracts, Expanded Academic, Gale, Google Scholar, Health Reference Center Academic, OCLC, PsychINFO, PsyARTICLES, SCOPUS, Social Science Abstracts, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Price- and Services-Related Preferences for Nursing Homes in Japan Using a Nested Logit Model in Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis Identification of Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of a New Pain Assessment Mobile Health Application by Family Carers of People with Dementia: A Qualitative Study Factors Affecting Hypertension among Middle and Old Aged People in Northern Region of India: A Cross-Sectional Study Using LASI Wave-1 Data Influence of Individual and Contextual Variables on Negative Stereotypes of Ageing in a Spanish Sample Incidental Physical Activity and Physical Fitness Associate with Sustained Attention and Impulse Control in Older Adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1