Ageism before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 1.9 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY Translational Issues in Psychological Science Pub Date : 2022-04-14 DOI:10.1037/tps0000323
Laura E. Bernstein, Alexandria R. Ebert, J. Hicks Patrick
{"title":"Ageism before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Laura E. Bernstein, Alexandria R. Ebert, J. Hicks Patrick","doi":"10.1037/tps0000323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both benevolent and hostile ageism can have deleterious effects on older adults. Given the explicit ageist messages in the media, we anticipated increases in both benevolent and hostile ageism in the context of COVID-19. Moreover, we predicted that age and initial COVID-related concerns would influence both initial levels and change over time in ageism, with younger adults and those who were more concerned about COVID-19 exhibiting higher levels of both types of ageism. Adults (N = 325, M-age = 39.7) were surveyed at 5 time points across the first 4 months of the COVID-19 outbreak in the U.S. A series of growth curve analyses was conducted to examine individual differences in ageism and change over time for each type of ageism. We were able to detect individual differences in both benevolent and hostile ageism. Benevolent ageism and hostile ageism decreased over time. Although age and COVID-19 concerns were associated with initial levels of ageism, neither influenced the rate of change. Our results demonstrate that benevolent ageism and hostile ageism decreased over the first 4 months of the U.S. pandemic. As a dynamic situation, changes may require a longer period of time in order to be detected.","PeriodicalId":29959,"journal":{"name":"Translational Issues in Psychological Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Issues in Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Both benevolent and hostile ageism can have deleterious effects on older adults. Given the explicit ageist messages in the media, we anticipated increases in both benevolent and hostile ageism in the context of COVID-19. Moreover, we predicted that age and initial COVID-related concerns would influence both initial levels and change over time in ageism, with younger adults and those who were more concerned about COVID-19 exhibiting higher levels of both types of ageism. Adults (N = 325, M-age = 39.7) were surveyed at 5 time points across the first 4 months of the COVID-19 outbreak in the U.S. A series of growth curve analyses was conducted to examine individual differences in ageism and change over time for each type of ageism. We were able to detect individual differences in both benevolent and hostile ageism. Benevolent ageism and hostile ageism decreased over time. Although age and COVID-19 concerns were associated with initial levels of ageism, neither influenced the rate of change. Our results demonstrate that benevolent ageism and hostile ageism decreased over the first 4 months of the U.S. pandemic. As a dynamic situation, changes may require a longer period of time in order to be detected.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎大流行之前和期间的老年主义。
仁慈和敌对的年龄歧视都会对老年人产生有害影响。鉴于媒体中明确的年龄歧视信息,我们预计在新冠肺炎的背景下,善意和敌对的年龄歧视都会增加。此外,我们预测,年龄和最初与新冠肺炎相关的担忧将影响年龄歧视的初始水平和随时间的变化,年轻人和更关注新冠肺炎的人表现出更高水平的两种年龄歧视。在美国新冠肺炎爆发的前4个月,在5个时间点对成年人(N=325,M年龄=39.7)进行了调查。进行了一系列生长曲线分析,以检查年龄歧视的个体差异以及每种类型年龄歧视随时间的变化。我们能够发现仁慈和敌对年龄歧视的个体差异。善意的年龄歧视和敌对的年龄歧视随着时间的推移而减少。尽管年龄和新冠肺炎担忧与年龄歧视的初始水平有关,但两者都不影响变化率。我们的研究结果表明,在美国疫情的前4个月,仁慈的年龄歧视和敌对的年龄歧视有所减少。作为一种动态情况,变化可能需要更长的时间才能被检测到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Our group is worth the fight: Group cohesion is embedded in willingness to fight or die for relatively deprived political groups during national elections. Addressing mass incarceration amid a pandemic: Psychology informing decarceration as a racial justice and public health response. Psychometric properties of the GAD-7 among college students: Reliability, validity, factor structure, and measurement invariance. How group characteristics determine the relationship between perceived group cohesion and collective action intentions. New Zealand pharmacists' views regarding the current prescribing courses: questionnaire survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1