Exploring commonalities and disparities of seattle residents' perceptions on dockless bike-sharing across gender

Q1 Social Sciences City, Culture and Society Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ccs.2023.100503
Boniphace Kutela , Angela E. Kitali , Emmanuel Kidando , Neema Langa , Norris Novat , Sia Mwende
{"title":"Exploring commonalities and disparities of seattle residents' perceptions on dockless bike-sharing across gender","authors":"Boniphace Kutela ,&nbsp;Angela E. Kitali ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Kidando ,&nbsp;Neema Langa ,&nbsp;Norris Novat ,&nbsp;Sia Mwende","doi":"10.1016/j.ccs.2023.100503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent years, dockless bike-sharing programs have been introduced to either substitute or complement docked bike-sharing programs. Riders of these devices always have perceived differences of one system over the other, which could vary across gender. This study applied a text network approach to explore the residents' perceptions of the dockless bike-sharing program across gender. The study used over 700 responses collected between February and March 2018 in Seattle, Washington. The results revealed that ease of use, convenience, safety, pricing, and quality areas make a tremendous difference in the perception of dockless over docked bike-sharing systems. The perception of ease of use and convenience does not vary significantly across genders. On the other hand, male respondents were more aligned on the better pricing scheme and the bikes' quality than female respondents. Conversely, female respondents did care more about safety in terms of helmet use. Moreover, female respondents were more explicit in explaining the negative characteristics of the dockless bike-sharing system over docked ones. Study findings can help policymakers and operators of dockless bikes to provide equity in service for both genders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39061,"journal":{"name":"City, Culture and Society","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100503"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City, Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877916623000024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In recent years, dockless bike-sharing programs have been introduced to either substitute or complement docked bike-sharing programs. Riders of these devices always have perceived differences of one system over the other, which could vary across gender. This study applied a text network approach to explore the residents' perceptions of the dockless bike-sharing program across gender. The study used over 700 responses collected between February and March 2018 in Seattle, Washington. The results revealed that ease of use, convenience, safety, pricing, and quality areas make a tremendous difference in the perception of dockless over docked bike-sharing systems. The perception of ease of use and convenience does not vary significantly across genders. On the other hand, male respondents were more aligned on the better pricing scheme and the bikes' quality than female respondents. Conversely, female respondents did care more about safety in terms of helmet use. Moreover, female respondents were more explicit in explaining the negative characteristics of the dockless bike-sharing system over docked ones. Study findings can help policymakers and operators of dockless bikes to provide equity in service for both genders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨西雅图居民对无桩共享单车的看法在性别上的共性和差异
近年来,无码头共享单车项目被引入,以取代或补充停靠的共享单车项目。这些设备的使用者总是感觉到一个系统与另一个系统的差异,这可能因性别而异。本研究采用文本网络方法,探讨了不同性别的居民对无码头共享单车项目的看法。该研究使用了2018年2月至3月在华盛顿州西雅图收集的700多份回复。研究结果显示,易用性、便利性、安全性、定价和质量领域对无码头共享单车系统与有码头共享单车的感知产生了巨大差异。不同性别对易用性和便利性的看法没有显著差异。另一方面,男性受访者在更好的定价方案和自行车质量方面比女性受访者更一致。相反,女性受访者在使用头盔方面确实更关心安全。此外,女性受访者更明确地解释了无码头共享单车系统的负面特征。研究结果可以帮助无码头自行车的决策者和运营商为两性提供公平的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
City, Culture and Society
City, Culture and Society Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The public library building as nexus for social interactions: Cases from Helsinki Urban religion and gendered bodies Decoding urban power: Architecture, symbolism and territorial control in Caracas Analysis of contextual factors influencing the development of unplanned settlements: The case of Herat City, Afghanistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1