Unpacking support: A strengths-based investigation into the needs of incarcerated individuals’ loved ones

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK Qualitative Social Work Pub Date : 2023-04-06 DOI:10.1177/14733250231167803
Eman Tadros, A. Henson, Sarah Presley
{"title":"Unpacking support: A strengths-based investigation into the needs of incarcerated individuals’ loved ones","authors":"Eman Tadros, A. Henson, Sarah Presley","doi":"10.1177/14733250231167803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United States incarcerates more people than any other country in the world. As a result, a growing body of critical research has sought to understand the impact of the carceral experience, not only on those currently or previously incarcerated, but also on those connected to incarcerated individuals. Much of this research identifies the barriers and difficulties loved ones of incarcerated individuals (LOIs) encounter; however, few of these studies highlight the ways LOIs navigate and overcome such barriers. By using this deficits-framework, LOIs can be mischaracterized as solely powerless or disordered. Also, while many studies importantly identify difficulties in navigating the carceral experience of a loved one, few allow LOIs to speak directly to their needs. Drawing upon deidentified Facebook posts from an online LOI group, the current study takes a strengths-based approach to showcase how LOIs attempt to address their needs and assuage difficulties by engaging in storytelling, advice and information sharing, and advocacy work.","PeriodicalId":47677,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Social Work","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250231167803","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The United States incarcerates more people than any other country in the world. As a result, a growing body of critical research has sought to understand the impact of the carceral experience, not only on those currently or previously incarcerated, but also on those connected to incarcerated individuals. Much of this research identifies the barriers and difficulties loved ones of incarcerated individuals (LOIs) encounter; however, few of these studies highlight the ways LOIs navigate and overcome such barriers. By using this deficits-framework, LOIs can be mischaracterized as solely powerless or disordered. Also, while many studies importantly identify difficulties in navigating the carceral experience of a loved one, few allow LOIs to speak directly to their needs. Drawing upon deidentified Facebook posts from an online LOI group, the current study takes a strengths-based approach to showcase how LOIs attempt to address their needs and assuage difficulties by engaging in storytelling, advice and information sharing, and advocacy work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拆解支持:一项基于优势的调查,调查被监禁者的亲人的需求
美国监禁的人比世界上任何其他国家都多。因此,越来越多的批判性研究试图了解尸体经历的影响,不仅对目前或以前被监禁的人,而且对那些与被监禁者有关的人。这项研究的大部分内容都确定了被监禁者的亲人所遇到的障碍和困难;然而,这些研究很少强调LOI如何驾驭和克服这些障碍。通过使用这种赤字框架,LOI可能被错误地描述为完全无力或无序。此外,尽管许多研究重要地发现了在驾驭所爱之人的尸体体验方面的困难,但很少有研究允许LOI直接表达他们的需求。根据一个在线LOI小组在Facebook上发布的未识别帖子,目前的研究采用了一种基于优势的方法来展示LOI如何通过讲故事、建议和信息共享以及宣传工作来满足他们的需求并缓解困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: Qualitative Social Work provides a forum for those interested in qualitative research and evaluation and in qualitative approaches to practice. The journal facilitates interactive dialogue and integration between those interested in qualitative research and methodology and those involved in the world of practice. It reflects the fact that these worlds are increasingly international and interdisciplinary in nature. The journal is a forum for rigorous dialogue that promotes qualitatively informed professional practice and inquiry.
期刊最新文献
Toward a creative and imaginative research approach: Collage as a method of inquiry in social work Book review: Time In this issue… How conversations can empower and involve: Building the evidence for Approved Mental Health Professionals’ communicative practices Themes do not emerge. An editor’s reflections on the use of Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1