Did the great influenza of 1918–1920 trigger a reversal of the first era of globalization?*

IF 1.5 Q2 ECONOMICS INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS AND ECONOMIC POLICY Pub Date : 2021-07-22 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3766187
P. Siklos
{"title":"Did the great influenza of 1918–1920 trigger a reversal of the first era of globalization?*","authors":"P. Siklos","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3766187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I revisit the 1918–20 pandemic and ask whether it led to a reversal in the rise of trade and financial globalization that preceded it. Using annual data for 17 countries for the 1870–1928 period, a variety of tests and techniques are used to draw some robust conclusions. Overall, the pandemic a century ago interrupted, but did not put an end, to the first globalization of the twentieth century. However, two blocs consisting of combatant and non-combatant countries, experienced significantly different consequences. Globalization was sharply curtailed for the combatant countries while there were few, if any, consequences for globalization in the non-combatant group of countries. That said, there was considerable resilience especially in trade openness among several of the combatant economies. Perhaps changes in the make-up of economic blocs, post-pandemic, is a fallout from shocks of this kind. While there are lessons for the ongoing COVID pandemics differences between the 1920s and today also play a role.","PeriodicalId":42639,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS AND ECONOMIC POLICY","volume":"19 1","pages":"459 - 490"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS AND ECONOMIC POLICY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3766187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

I revisit the 1918–20 pandemic and ask whether it led to a reversal in the rise of trade and financial globalization that preceded it. Using annual data for 17 countries for the 1870–1928 period, a variety of tests and techniques are used to draw some robust conclusions. Overall, the pandemic a century ago interrupted, but did not put an end, to the first globalization of the twentieth century. However, two blocs consisting of combatant and non-combatant countries, experienced significantly different consequences. Globalization was sharply curtailed for the combatant countries while there were few, if any, consequences for globalization in the non-combatant group of countries. That said, there was considerable resilience especially in trade openness among several of the combatant economies. Perhaps changes in the make-up of economic blocs, post-pandemic, is a fallout from shocks of this kind. While there are lessons for the ongoing COVID pandemics differences between the 1920s and today also play a role.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1918年至1920年的大流感是否引发了第一个全球化时代的逆转*
我回顾了1918年至1920年的大流行,并询问它是否导致了之前贸易和金融全球化兴起的逆转。利用1870-1928年期间17个国家的年度数据,采用各种测试和技术得出了一些可靠的结论。总的来说,一个世纪前的大流行病中断了,但没有结束二十世纪的第一次全球化。然而,由战斗国家和非战斗国家组成的两个集团经历了明显不同的后果。全球化对参战国家的影响急剧减少,而对非战斗国家集团的全球化的影响很少,如果有的话。话虽如此,几个受打击的经济体在贸易开放方面表现出相当大的韧性。也许大流行后经济集团构成的变化是这种冲击的后果。虽然正在进行的COVID大流行有一些教训,但20世纪20年代和今天之间的差异也发挥了作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The double-blind peer reviewed Journal International Economics and Economic Policy publishes empirical and theoretical contributions, especially papers which are relevant for economic policy. The main focus of the journal is on comparative economic policy, international political economy, including international organizations and policy cooperation, monetary and real/technological dynamics in open economies, globalization and regional integration, trade, migration, international investment, internet commerce and regulation.IEEP particularly offers contributions from the policy community and provides a forum for exchange for the academic and policy community. Officially cited as: Int Econ Econ Policy
期刊最新文献
Evaluating accession decisions in customs unions: a dynamic machine learning approach. Inflation and inequality: new evidence from a dynamic panel threshold analysis How do regional extreme events shape supply-chain trade? Can external sustainability be decoupled from the NIIP? City-specific determinants of cross-border M&As: an inter-urban gravity approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1