Machine learning and manager selection: evidence from South Africa

IF 2.7 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS International Journal of Emerging Markets Pub Date : 2023-07-28 DOI:10.1108/ijoem-06-2022-0998
Daniel Page, Yudhvir Seetharam, C. Auret
{"title":"Machine learning and manager selection: evidence from South Africa","authors":"Daniel Page, Yudhvir Seetharam, C. Auret","doi":"10.1108/ijoem-06-2022-0998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study investigates whether the skilled minority of active equity managers in emerging markets can be identified using a machine learning (ML) framework that incorporates a large set of performance characteristics.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses a cross-section of South African active equity managers from January 2002 to December 2021. The performance characteristics are analysed using ML models, with a particular focus on gradient boosters, and naïve selection techniques such as momentum and style alpha. The out-of-sample nominal, excess and risk-adjusted returns are evaluated, and precision tests are conducted to assess the accuracy of the performance predictions.FindingsA minority of active managers exhibit skill that results in generating alpha, even after accounting for fees, and show that ML models, particularly gradient boosters, are superior at identifying non-linearities. LightGBM (LG) achieves the highest out-of-sample nominal, excess and risk-adjusted return and proves to be the most accurate predictor of performance in precision tests. Naïve selection techniques, such as momentum and style alpha, outperform most ML models in forecasting emerging market active manager performance.Originality/valueThe authors contribute to the literature by demonstrating that a ML approach that incorporates a large set of performance characteristics can be used to identify skilled active equity managers in emerging markets. The findings suggest that both ML models and naïve selection techniques can be used to predict performance, but the former is more accurate in predicting ex ante performance. This study has practical implications for investment practitioners and academics interested in active asset manager performance in emerging markets.","PeriodicalId":47381,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emerging Markets","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emerging Markets","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoem-06-2022-0998","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study investigates whether the skilled minority of active equity managers in emerging markets can be identified using a machine learning (ML) framework that incorporates a large set of performance characteristics.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses a cross-section of South African active equity managers from January 2002 to December 2021. The performance characteristics are analysed using ML models, with a particular focus on gradient boosters, and naïve selection techniques such as momentum and style alpha. The out-of-sample nominal, excess and risk-adjusted returns are evaluated, and precision tests are conducted to assess the accuracy of the performance predictions.FindingsA minority of active managers exhibit skill that results in generating alpha, even after accounting for fees, and show that ML models, particularly gradient boosters, are superior at identifying non-linearities. LightGBM (LG) achieves the highest out-of-sample nominal, excess and risk-adjusted return and proves to be the most accurate predictor of performance in precision tests. Naïve selection techniques, such as momentum and style alpha, outperform most ML models in forecasting emerging market active manager performance.Originality/valueThe authors contribute to the literature by demonstrating that a ML approach that incorporates a large set of performance characteristics can be used to identify skilled active equity managers in emerging markets. The findings suggest that both ML models and naïve selection techniques can be used to predict performance, but the former is more accurate in predicting ex ante performance. This study has practical implications for investment practitioners and academics interested in active asset manager performance in emerging markets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习和管理者选择:来自南非的证据
本研究调查了新兴市场中少数熟练的主动股票经理是否可以使用包含大量绩效特征的机器学习(ML)框架来识别。设计/方法/方法本研究使用了2002年1月至2021年12月期间南非主动股票经理的横截面。使用ML模型分析性能特征,特别关注梯度助推器,以及naïve选择技术,如动量和风格alpha。评估了样本外的名义收益、超额收益和风险调整后的收益,并进行了精度测试,以评估业绩预测的准确性。少数主动型基金经理表现出了产生阿尔法的技能,即使在考虑了费用后也是如此。研究结果表明,ML模型,尤其是梯度增强模型,在识别非线性方面更有优势。LightGBM (LG)实现最高的样本外标称,超额和风险调整后的回报,并证明是精度测试中最准确的性能预测器。Naïve选择技术,如动量和风格alpha,在预测新兴市场主动经理绩效方面优于大多数ML模型。原创性/价值作者通过证明一种包含大量绩效特征的机器学习方法可用于识别新兴市场中熟练的主动股票经理,从而为文献做出了贡献。研究结果表明,ML模型和naïve选择技术都可以用于预测性能,但前者在预测事前性能方面更准确。本研究对对新兴市场主动资产管理公司绩效感兴趣的投资从业者和学者具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
206
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of aggregate and sectoral time-varying market efficiency in the Russian stock market during the COVID-19 outbreak and the Russia–Ukraine conflict (RUC) Run, not walk: advanced red queen effect and mutual forbearance effect in multimarket contact Revisiting oil-stock nexus in the time of health crisis: a wavelet approach Rhetorical strategies in the climate change disclosures of Bangladeshi banking companies Exploring panic buying as a situational response – the role of fear, media exposure and context-specific paranoia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1