Exploring arXiv usage habits among Slovenian scientists

IF 1.7 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Documentation Pub Date : 2023-02-10 DOI:10.1108/jd-07-2022-0162
Zala Metelko, J. Maver
{"title":"Exploring arXiv usage habits among Slovenian scientists","authors":"Zala Metelko, J. Maver","doi":"10.1108/jd-07-2022-0162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study investigates how important the preprint arXiv is for Slovenian scientists, whether there are differences between scientific disciplines and the reputation of arXiv among Slovenian scientists. We are also interested in what advantages and disadvantages scientists see in using arXiv.Design/methodology/approachA voluntary sample of active researchers from the scientific fields covered by arXiv was used. Data were collected over 21 days in September 2021 using a 40-question online survey. In addition to descriptive statistics, nonparametric statistical methods such as Pearson's chi-squared test for independence, Kruskal-Wallis' H-test and Mann-Whitney's U-test were applied to the collected data.FindingsAmong Slovenian scientists there is a wide range of different users of arXiv. The authors note differences among scientific disciplines. Physicists and astronomers are the most engaged, followed by mathematicians. Researchers in computer science, electrical engineering and systems science seem to have recognized the benefits of the archive, but are still hesitant to use it. Researchers from the other scientific fields participated in the survey to a lesser extent, suggesting that arXiv is less popular in these scientific fields. For Slovenian scientists, the main advantages of arXiv are faster access to knowledge, open access, greater impact of scientists' work and the fact that publishing in the archive is free of charge. A negative aspect of using the archive is the frustration caused by the difficulties in assessing the credibility of articles.Research limitations/implicationsA voluntary sample was used, which attracted a larger number of researchers but has a higher risk of sampling bias.Practical implicationsThe results are useful for international comparisons, but also provide bases and recommendations for institutional and national policies to evaluate researchers and their performance.Originality/valueThe results provide valuable insights into arXiv usage habits and the reasons for using or not using arXiv by Slovenian scientists. There is no comparable study conducted in Slovenia.","PeriodicalId":47969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Documentation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Documentation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-07-2022-0162","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study investigates how important the preprint arXiv is for Slovenian scientists, whether there are differences between scientific disciplines and the reputation of arXiv among Slovenian scientists. We are also interested in what advantages and disadvantages scientists see in using arXiv.Design/methodology/approachA voluntary sample of active researchers from the scientific fields covered by arXiv was used. Data were collected over 21 days in September 2021 using a 40-question online survey. In addition to descriptive statistics, nonparametric statistical methods such as Pearson's chi-squared test for independence, Kruskal-Wallis' H-test and Mann-Whitney's U-test were applied to the collected data.FindingsAmong Slovenian scientists there is a wide range of different users of arXiv. The authors note differences among scientific disciplines. Physicists and astronomers are the most engaged, followed by mathematicians. Researchers in computer science, electrical engineering and systems science seem to have recognized the benefits of the archive, but are still hesitant to use it. Researchers from the other scientific fields participated in the survey to a lesser extent, suggesting that arXiv is less popular in these scientific fields. For Slovenian scientists, the main advantages of arXiv are faster access to knowledge, open access, greater impact of scientists' work and the fact that publishing in the archive is free of charge. A negative aspect of using the archive is the frustration caused by the difficulties in assessing the credibility of articles.Research limitations/implicationsA voluntary sample was used, which attracted a larger number of researchers but has a higher risk of sampling bias.Practical implicationsThe results are useful for international comparisons, but also provide bases and recommendations for institutional and national policies to evaluate researchers and their performance.Originality/valueThe results provide valuable insights into arXiv usage habits and the reasons for using or not using arXiv by Slovenian scientists. There is no comparable study conducted in Slovenia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索斯洛文尼亚科学家的arXiv使用习惯
目的本研究考察预印本arXiv对斯洛文尼亚科学家的重要性,科学学科之间是否存在差异,以及arXiv在斯洛文尼亚科学家中的声誉。我们也对科学家认为使用arXiv的优点和缺点感兴趣。设计/方法/方法采用来自arXiv所涵盖的科学领域的活跃研究人员自愿抽样。数据是在2021年9月的21天内通过40个问题的在线调查收集的。除描述性统计外,收集的数据还采用非参数统计方法,如Pearson的独立性卡方检验、Kruskal-Wallis的h检验和Mann-Whitney的u检验。在斯洛文尼亚的科学家中,arXiv的使用者范围很广。作者指出了科学学科之间的差异。物理学家和天文学家参与最多,其次是数学家。计算机科学、电子工程和系统科学领域的研究人员似乎已经认识到档案的好处,但仍在犹豫是否要使用它。其他科学领域的研究人员参与调查的程度较低,这表明arXiv在这些科学领域不太受欢迎。对于斯洛文尼亚的科学家来说,arXiv的主要优势是更快地获取知识、开放获取、科学家工作的更大影响以及在档案库中免费发表论文。使用档案的一个消极方面是由于难以评估文章的可信度而引起的挫败感。研究局限性/启示采用自愿抽样,吸引了大量研究人员,但抽样偏倚风险较高。实际意义研究结果不仅有助于国际比较,而且为机构和国家政策评估研究人员及其表现提供了依据和建议。原创性/价值该研究结果为斯洛文尼亚科学家对arXiv使用习惯和使用或不使用arXiv的原因提供了有价值的见解。斯洛文尼亚没有进行类似的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Documentation
Journal of Documentation INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The scope of the Journal of Documentation is broadly information sciences, encompassing all of the academic and professional disciplines which deal with recorded information. These include, but are certainly not limited to: ■Information science, librarianship and related disciplines ■Information and knowledge management ■Information and knowledge organisation ■Information seeking and retrieval, and human information behaviour ■Information and digital literacies
期刊最新文献
Information experiences of bonsai growers: a phenomenological study in serious leisure Information experiences of bonsai growers: a phenomenological study in serious leisure Constructing risk in trustworthy digital repositories Information seeking and communication model (ISCM): application and extension Evolving legitimacy of the public library in the 21st century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1