Hedges and Boosters in Indonesian Scientific Articles

IF 0.6 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REGISTER Journal Pub Date : 2021-03-09 DOI:10.18326/RGT.V14I1.65-82
Hanung Triyoko, I. P. Wijana, I. P. Baryadi
{"title":"Hedges and Boosters in Indonesian Scientific Articles","authors":"Hanung Triyoko, I. P. Wijana, I. P. Baryadi","doi":"10.18326/RGT.V14I1.65-82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hedging and boosting or ‘pembentengan’ (Indonesian) is the act of scientific writers in maintaining smooth scientific communication. This paper answers two problem formulations, i.e., what are the linguistic manifestations of hedges and boosters in Indonesian scientific articles, and how their meaning reveals the writer's level of confidence in the information conveyed. This study aims to enrich the description of scientific writing practices in Indonesia to support the development of scientific writing skills in general. This research uses descriptive qualitative methods. This research data is in the form of sentences containing hedges and boosters from various scientific journals published in Indonesia through the note-taking technique. The main theory to analyze the data is the theory on hedges and boosters. The data were analyzed semantically, syntactically, and pragmatically. The results show that hedges and boosters in the form of adverbs are the most commonly used in Indonesian Scientific writing. The meaning of hedges and boosters cannot always be determined by their lexical meaning because each hedge and booster has to be seen in its use in the sentence. The Indonesian scientific community has its own agreement in the social interaction of scientific articles.Keywords: scientific writing; hedges and boosters; confidence; doubt; function; interaction","PeriodicalId":40585,"journal":{"name":"REGISTER Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REGISTER Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18326/RGT.V14I1.65-82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Hedging and boosting or ‘pembentengan’ (Indonesian) is the act of scientific writers in maintaining smooth scientific communication. This paper answers two problem formulations, i.e., what are the linguistic manifestations of hedges and boosters in Indonesian scientific articles, and how their meaning reveals the writer's level of confidence in the information conveyed. This study aims to enrich the description of scientific writing practices in Indonesia to support the development of scientific writing skills in general. This research uses descriptive qualitative methods. This research data is in the form of sentences containing hedges and boosters from various scientific journals published in Indonesia through the note-taking technique. The main theory to analyze the data is the theory on hedges and boosters. The data were analyzed semantically, syntactically, and pragmatically. The results show that hedges and boosters in the form of adverbs are the most commonly used in Indonesian Scientific writing. The meaning of hedges and boosters cannot always be determined by their lexical meaning because each hedge and booster has to be seen in its use in the sentence. The Indonesian scientific community has its own agreement in the social interaction of scientific articles.Keywords: scientific writing; hedges and boosters; confidence; doubt; function; interaction
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼科学文章中的套期保值和助推词
遮遮掩掩或“pembentengan”(印尼语)是科学作家保持顺畅的科学交流的行为。本文回答了两个问题提法,即印度尼西亚科技文章中限制语和助推词的语言表现形式是什么,以及它们的意义如何揭示作者对所传达信息的信心程度。本研究旨在丰富印度尼西亚科学写作实践的描述,以支持科学写作技能的总体发展。本研究采用描述性定性方法。本研究数据是以句子的形式出现的,其中包含模糊限制语和助推器,这些句子来自印度尼西亚通过记笔记技术发表的各种科学期刊。分析数据的主要理论是对冲和助推理论。对数据进行了语义、句法和语用分析。研究结果表明,限制语和助推词是印尼语科技写作中最常用的副词形式。限制语和加强语的含义不能总是由它们的词汇意义来确定,因为每个限制语和加强语都必须在句子中的用法中看到。印尼科学界在科学文章的社会互动方面有自己的共识。关键词:科技写作;对冲和助推器;信心;怀疑;函数;交互
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
REGISTER Journal
REGISTER Journal Multiple-
自引率
4.80%
发文量
2
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mobile-assisted English language learning for young learners during COVID-19 distance learning: Teachers’ experiences and voices Ten Years after Sutton (2012): Quo Vadis Feedback Literacy? (A Bibliometric Study) Intercultural Communicative Competence Model Using English Literature: A Case Study at Some Islamic Universities in Indonesia Marriage, Conflict, and Communication: Pragmatic Inquiry into Impoliteness in the Marital Relationship Proposing A Web-Based Interactive Module for Education for Sustainable Development in English for Computer Science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1