Xincong Liu , Yaqin Jiang , Xiangyu Zheng , Wenyue Hou , Xiehang Chen , Shijiang Xiao , Xiaohong Zhang , Shihuai Deng , Jingjing Hao , Huawei Luo , Hengyu Pan
{"title":"Moving towards co-benefits of hydropower: Ecological efficiency evaluation based on LCA and DEA","authors":"Xincong Liu , Yaqin Jiang , Xiangyu Zheng , Wenyue Hou , Xiehang Chen , Shijiang Xiao , Xiaohong Zhang , Shihuai Deng , Jingjing Hao , Huawei Luo , Hengyu Pan","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>China is ambitious to develop renewable energy for the commitment of carbon neutralization in 2060. Hydropower has been regarded as one important solution to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by replacing fossil fuels, while the related ecological impacts hinder its sustainable development. This study proposes a framework to integrate life cycle analysis<span><span> and ecosystem service assessment by evaluating 43 case hydropower plants (HPs) in China. Combining with the super slacks-based measurement model, the ecological efficiency of HPs is evaluated to provide optimizing pathways. The results show most </span>environmental impacts<span><span> of the whole HP life cycle are from the preparation and construction stages of HPs. The ecosystem service losses (ESLs) are mainly from the losses of biodiversity and water supply. The first cascade HP generally has a smaller ecological efficiency than downstream HPs. Furthermore, the current pricing structure of the studied HPs does not adequately account for the associated ESLs. It suggests that consumers in transmission destinations should bear a higher cost to address the ecological impacts of HP operations. Consequently, there is a need to revise the pricing mechanisms to reflect and internalize the ecological costs more accurately. Finally, based on the results, policy implications for achieving “co-benefit” of </span>hydropower development and ecosystem protection were raised: (a) conducting the comprehensive and systematic evaluation of HPs including LCA and ESL assessment before HP planning; (b) ensuring the connectivity of natural flow and the preservation of fish areas; (c) revising the pricing mechanisms of hydropower based on the fair price.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 107208"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925523001749","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
China is ambitious to develop renewable energy for the commitment of carbon neutralization in 2060. Hydropower has been regarded as one important solution to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by replacing fossil fuels, while the related ecological impacts hinder its sustainable development. This study proposes a framework to integrate life cycle analysis and ecosystem service assessment by evaluating 43 case hydropower plants (HPs) in China. Combining with the super slacks-based measurement model, the ecological efficiency of HPs is evaluated to provide optimizing pathways. The results show most environmental impacts of the whole HP life cycle are from the preparation and construction stages of HPs. The ecosystem service losses (ESLs) are mainly from the losses of biodiversity and water supply. The first cascade HP generally has a smaller ecological efficiency than downstream HPs. Furthermore, the current pricing structure of the studied HPs does not adequately account for the associated ESLs. It suggests that consumers in transmission destinations should bear a higher cost to address the ecological impacts of HP operations. Consequently, there is a need to revise the pricing mechanisms to reflect and internalize the ecological costs more accurately. Finally, based on the results, policy implications for achieving “co-benefit” of hydropower development and ecosystem protection were raised: (a) conducting the comprehensive and systematic evaluation of HPs including LCA and ESL assessment before HP planning; (b) ensuring the connectivity of natural flow and the preservation of fish areas; (c) revising the pricing mechanisms of hydropower based on the fair price.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.