Bell’s Inequality Should Be Reconsidered in Quantum Language

S. Ishikawa
{"title":"Bell’s Inequality Should Be Reconsidered in Quantum Language","authors":"S. Ishikawa","doi":"10.4236/JQIS.2017.74011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bell’s inequality itself is usually considered to belong to mathematics and not quantum mechanics. We think that this is making our understanding of Bell’ theory be confused. Thus in this paper, contrary to Bell’s spirit (which inherits Einstein’s spirit), we try to discuss Bell’s inequality in the framework of quantum theory with the linguistic Copenhagen interpretation. And we clarify that the violation of Bell’s inequality (i.e., whether or not Bell’s inequality holds) does not depend on whether classical systems or quantum systems, but depend on whether a combined measurement exists or not. And further we conclude that our argument (based on the linguistic Copenhagen interpretation) should be regarded as a scientific representation of Bell’s philosophical argument (based on Einstein’s spirit).","PeriodicalId":58996,"journal":{"name":"量子信息科学期刊(英文)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"量子信息科学期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/JQIS.2017.74011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Bell’s inequality itself is usually considered to belong to mathematics and not quantum mechanics. We think that this is making our understanding of Bell’ theory be confused. Thus in this paper, contrary to Bell’s spirit (which inherits Einstein’s spirit), we try to discuss Bell’s inequality in the framework of quantum theory with the linguistic Copenhagen interpretation. And we clarify that the violation of Bell’s inequality (i.e., whether or not Bell’s inequality holds) does not depend on whether classical systems or quantum systems, but depend on whether a combined measurement exists or not. And further we conclude that our argument (based on the linguistic Copenhagen interpretation) should be regarded as a scientific representation of Bell’s philosophical argument (based on Einstein’s spirit).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量子语言中应重新考虑Bell不等式
贝尔不等式本身通常被认为属于数学,而不是量子力学。我们认为这是在混淆我们对贝尔理论的理解。因此,在本文中,我们试图与贝尔的精神(继承了爱因斯坦的精神)相反,在量子理论的框架下,用语言哥本哈根解释来讨论贝尔的不等式。我们澄清了贝尔不等式的违反(即贝尔不等式是否成立)并不取决于经典系统还是量子系统,而是取决于组合测量是否存在。此外,我们得出结论,我们的论点(基于哥本哈根语言解释)应该被视为贝尔哲学论点(基于爱因斯坦精神)的科学代表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
期刊最新文献
Toward Constructing a Continuous Logical Operator for Error-Corrected Quantum Sensing What in Fact Proves the Violation of the Bell-Type Inequalities? Quantum Algorithm for Mining Frequent Patterns for Association Rule Mining Bell’s Theorem and Einstein’s Worry about Quantum Mechanics Accelerating Quantum Readiness for Sectors: Risk Management and Strategies for Sectors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1