Food selection by spring-migrating green-winged teal

IF 0.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management Pub Date : 2022-03-09 DOI:10.3996/jfwm-21-075
S. T. Klimas, J. Osborn, A. Yetter, J. D. Lancaster, C. Jacques, Amv Fournier, H. Hagy
{"title":"Food selection by spring-migrating green-winged teal","authors":"S. T. Klimas, J. Osborn, A. Yetter, J. D. Lancaster, C. Jacques, Amv Fournier, H. Hagy","doi":"10.3996/jfwm-21-075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Mississippi Flyway supports millions of waterfowl during spring migration as individuals replenish vital nutrients en route to breeding locations.  Green-winged teal Anas crecca consume natural plant and animal foods in shallow wetlands during autumn and winter, but little information is available to describe food use and selection during spring migration.  We experimentally collected green-winged teal and quantified food use and availability to determine selection in the Illinois River Valley during February–April 2016–2018.  We removed, dried, and weighed (± 0.1 mg) food items by taxa from the upper digestive tract (proventriculus and esophagus) of birds and core samples for comparison.  Additionally, we evaluated retention of common diet items between small (#60; 250 µm) and medium (#35; 500 µm) sieves and the effect of processing sieve size on selection coefficients.  Seeds of moist-soil vegetation occurred in all green-winged teal diets, while invertebrates and vegetative material occurred in 67.4% and 25.8% of diets, respectively.  Green-winged teal consumed 85.8% (CI95 = 81.2–90.3%) plant material and 14.2% (CI95 = 9.6–18.7%) invertebrates based on aggregate dry biomass.  We failed to find support for selection of either plant or animal foods in general, but green-winged teal selected Cyperus spp., Ammannia spp., Leptochloa spp., and Potamogeton spp. and avoided Amaranthus spp., Ipomoea spp., Echinochloa spp., and Oligochaeta individual taxa.  We found no support for a difference in selection ratios between sexes, but selection ratios differed among years and wetland connectivity regimes with changes in food availability.  Sieve size had minimal impact on rank and selection intensity of most food items, but only small sieves captured Ammannia spp., which was an important diet item.  We found no evidence that green-winged teal selected invertebrates in our mid-latitude migration study area as has been speculated for dabbling ducks in general during spring migration (i.e., spring diet-shift hypothesis).  We encourage managers to provide shallowly flooded wetlands with desirable plant taxa (e.g., Cyperus spp., Ammannia spp., Leptochloa spp.) for green-winged teal by maintaining actively-managed moist-soil wetlands that are made available during spring migration.","PeriodicalId":49036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3996/jfwm-21-075","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Mississippi Flyway supports millions of waterfowl during spring migration as individuals replenish vital nutrients en route to breeding locations.  Green-winged teal Anas crecca consume natural plant and animal foods in shallow wetlands during autumn and winter, but little information is available to describe food use and selection during spring migration.  We experimentally collected green-winged teal and quantified food use and availability to determine selection in the Illinois River Valley during February–April 2016–2018.  We removed, dried, and weighed (± 0.1 mg) food items by taxa from the upper digestive tract (proventriculus and esophagus) of birds and core samples for comparison.  Additionally, we evaluated retention of common diet items between small (#60; 250 µm) and medium (#35; 500 µm) sieves and the effect of processing sieve size on selection coefficients.  Seeds of moist-soil vegetation occurred in all green-winged teal diets, while invertebrates and vegetative material occurred in 67.4% and 25.8% of diets, respectively.  Green-winged teal consumed 85.8% (CI95 = 81.2–90.3%) plant material and 14.2% (CI95 = 9.6–18.7%) invertebrates based on aggregate dry biomass.  We failed to find support for selection of either plant or animal foods in general, but green-winged teal selected Cyperus spp., Ammannia spp., Leptochloa spp., and Potamogeton spp. and avoided Amaranthus spp., Ipomoea spp., Echinochloa spp., and Oligochaeta individual taxa.  We found no support for a difference in selection ratios between sexes, but selection ratios differed among years and wetland connectivity regimes with changes in food availability.  Sieve size had minimal impact on rank and selection intensity of most food items, but only small sieves captured Ammannia spp., which was an important diet item.  We found no evidence that green-winged teal selected invertebrates in our mid-latitude migration study area as has been speculated for dabbling ducks in general during spring migration (i.e., spring diet-shift hypothesis).  We encourage managers to provide shallowly flooded wetlands with desirable plant taxa (e.g., Cyperus spp., Ammannia spp., Leptochloa spp.) for green-winged teal by maintaining actively-managed moist-soil wetlands that are made available during spring migration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
春季迁徙绿翅蓝雀的食物选择
密西西比飞行路线在春季迁徙期间为数百万只水禽提供支持,因为它们在前往繁殖地的途中补充重要营养。绿翅蓝雀在秋冬季节在浅湿地食用天然植物和动物食物,但几乎没有信息可以描述春季迁徙期间的食物使用和选择。我们在2016年2月至2018年4月期间,在伊利诺伊河谷通过实验收集了绿翅蓝绿色蓝绿色,并量化了食物的使用和可用性,以确定选择。我们从鸟类的上消化道(前胃和食道)和核心样本中按分类群取出、干燥和称重(±0.1 mg)食物,以进行比较。此外,我们评估了普通饮食项目在小筛(#60;250µm)和中筛(#35;500µm)之间的保留率,以及加工筛尺寸对选择系数的影响。潮湿土壤植被的种子出现在所有绿翅蓝绿色日粮中,而无脊椎动物和营养物质分别出现在67.4%和25.8%的日粮中。基于总干生物量,绿翅蓝雀消耗了85.8%(CI95=81.2–90.3%)的植物材料和14.2%(CI95=9.6–18.7%)的无脊椎动物。我们未能找到对植物或动物性食物选择的支持,但绿翅蓝绿色蓝绿色蓝选择了莎草属、阿曼尼亚属、钩吻草属和Potamogeton属,并避开了阿玛兰属、Ipomoea属、Echinochloa属和寡毛目个体分类群。我们没有发现性别之间选择比率的差异,但随着食物供应的变化,不同年份和湿地连通性制度的选择比率不同。筛的大小对大多数食物的等级和选择强度的影响很小,但只有小筛能捕获Ammannia spp.,这是一种重要的饮食项目。我们没有发现任何证据表明,绿翅蓝雀在我们的中纬度迁徙研究区选择了无脊椎动物,正如人们猜测的那样,在春季迁徙期间,通常会涉猎鸭子(即春季饮食变化假说)。我们鼓励管理者通过维护春季迁徙期间提供的积极管理的湿润土壤湿地,为浅泛湿地提供理想的绿翅蓝雀植物分类群(例如,莎草属、阿曼尼亚属、细齿蓝雀属)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management
Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-ECOLOGY
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management encourages submission of original, high quality, English-language scientific papers on the practical application and integration of science to conservation and management of native North American fish, wildlife, plants and their habitats in the following categories: Articles, Notes, Surveys and Issues and Perspectives. Papers that do not relate directly to native North American fish, wildlife plants or their habitats may be considered if they highlight species that are closely related to, or conservation issues that are germane to, those in North America.
期刊最新文献
Strangers in the blind: Identifying appropriate mentees and mentors for waterfowl hunter recruitment Simulation Modeling to Assess Line Transect Distance Sampling Under a Range of Translocation Scenarios Sampling duration and season recommendations for passive acoustic monitoring of bats after white-nose syndrome Striped Bass Morone saxatilis movement in a large southeastern river system Leveraging Angler Effort to Inform Fisheries Management: Using Harvest and Harvest Rate to Estimate Abundance of White Sturgeon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1