An Analysis of Metadiscourse and Pragmatic Hedges in Fred Rogers’ Commencement Speech

Intan Mustika Sari
{"title":"An Analysis of Metadiscourse and Pragmatic Hedges in Fred Rogers’ Commencement Speech","authors":"Intan Mustika Sari","doi":"10.31332/lkw.v0i0.5423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research on metadiscourse formerly examined the language tools used to construct a speech without looking further at the contextual-related resource. This study aims to investigate the textual and interpersonal meanings of Fred Rogers' commencement speech in Hyland's metadiscourse by examining interactive and interactional metadiscourse resources combined with Salager-Meyer's pragmatic hedges categorization. This present qualitative study adopted Bogdan et al. (1975) research design. The data were taken from Marquette University website on April 9th, 2022, and validated through documentation and audit trails. Afterward, they were identified and analyzed using Hyland's metadiscourse and Salager-Meyer pragmatic hedges framework in the interactive data analysis model proposed by Miles and Huberman which consists of data reduction, data display, and conclusion. The results revealed that self-mentions are the most significant interactional resource, reaching 47.39% of the total metadiscourse found in Fred Rogers' speech, and 30.33% are transition markers from interactive resources. In addition, the most significant hedge categories are shields and approximators that share the same accumulation at 35.29%. It showed that most words represent the speaker's intention to attract the audience's attention and emphasize his message by portraying the speaker's identity, attitude, and personal doubt. These results contribute to an understanding of metadiscourse markers and pragmatic hedges used for involving the speaker as the major constructor of discourse produced through the selection of markers in his utterances. The implications of this study can be a reference in selecting the linguistic markers to build effective communication for engaging the audience through discourse.","PeriodicalId":31933,"journal":{"name":"Langkawi Journal of The Association for Arabic and English","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langkawi Journal of The Association for Arabic and English","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31332/lkw.v0i0.5423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research on metadiscourse formerly examined the language tools used to construct a speech without looking further at the contextual-related resource. This study aims to investigate the textual and interpersonal meanings of Fred Rogers' commencement speech in Hyland's metadiscourse by examining interactive and interactional metadiscourse resources combined with Salager-Meyer's pragmatic hedges categorization. This present qualitative study adopted Bogdan et al. (1975) research design. The data were taken from Marquette University website on April 9th, 2022, and validated through documentation and audit trails. Afterward, they were identified and analyzed using Hyland's metadiscourse and Salager-Meyer pragmatic hedges framework in the interactive data analysis model proposed by Miles and Huberman which consists of data reduction, data display, and conclusion. The results revealed that self-mentions are the most significant interactional resource, reaching 47.39% of the total metadiscourse found in Fred Rogers' speech, and 30.33% are transition markers from interactive resources. In addition, the most significant hedge categories are shields and approximators that share the same accumulation at 35.29%. It showed that most words represent the speaker's intention to attract the audience's attention and emphasize his message by portraying the speaker's identity, attitude, and personal doubt. These results contribute to an understanding of metadiscourse markers and pragmatic hedges used for involving the speaker as the major constructor of discourse produced through the selection of markers in his utterances. The implications of this study can be a reference in selecting the linguistic markers to build effective communication for engaging the audience through discourse.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弗雷德·罗杰斯毕业典礼演讲中的元话语和语用对冲分析
元话语的研究以前考察了用于构建言语的语言工具,而没有进一步考察语境相关的资源。本研究旨在结合Salager-Meyer的语用模糊限制语分类,通过考察互动和互动元话语资源,探讨弗雷德·罗杰斯毕业典礼演讲在海兰德元话语中的语篇意义和人际意义。本定性研究采用Bogdan等人(1975)的研究设计。数据于2022年4月9日从马奎特大学网站上获取,并通过文件和审计跟踪进行验证。然后,在Miles和Huberman提出的交互式数据分析模型中,使用Hyland的元话语和Salager-Meyer语用模糊限制语框架对其进行识别和分析,该模型包括数据约简、数据显示和结论。结果表明,自我提及是最重要的互动资源,占弗雷德·罗杰斯演讲元话语总量的47.39%,30.33%是互动资源的过渡标记。此外,最显著的套期保值类别是盾牌和近似词,它们的累积量相同,为35.29%。研究表明,大多数词语代表了说话人通过描绘说话人的身份、态度和个人怀疑来吸引观众的注意力和强调其信息的意图。这些结果有助于理解元话语标记和语用模糊限制语,它们用于让说话人作为话语的主要建构者,通过在话语中选择标记来产生话语。本研究的启示可以为选择语言标记以建立有效的交际提供参考,从而通过话语吸引受众。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Grammatical Analysis of African American Vernacular English in The Eminem Show Album: A Linguistics Perspective Using Islamic Films to Foster Anti-Corruption Values: An Arabic Classroom-Based Study at an Indonesian Islamic University Willingness to Communicate in English: An Interview Study with Indonesian Vocational High School Students Arabic Translation Works in Expressing a Resistance: Case Study in Colonized Land Poetry of Nizar Qabbani Parentinguistics: Authoritarian and Permissive Communication Styles in Parents' Expressive Speech Acts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1