Experience Outside of Clinical Trial with Everolimus

Beatriz Losada Vila
{"title":"Experience Outside of Clinical Trial with Everolimus","authors":"Beatriz Losada Vila","doi":"10.19080/arr.2018.03.555625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"100% of the patients are <65 years old (1 premenopausal, on treatment with gnRH analogue), with an ECOG 0-1 in 100%. 40% started as a metastatic disease. Disease-free interval was greater than 2 years in 100% of the patients.20% present 3 or more metastatic locations, while the remaining 80% present between 1-2 locations. 100% have visceral involvement. The indication of everolimus in the 5 patients was as much in 1st line as in 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th line. The patient who received everolimus in the first line was due to progression to aromatase inhibitor during the adjuvant setting. Regarding the treatments previously received, 60% were treated with fulvestrant, while also 60% had previously received chemotherapy for metastatic disease. 80% were on exemestane in combination with everolimus, while 20% combined it with letrozole. The starting dose of everolimus was 10 mg in all patients. The median time on everolimus was 7.5 months (2-14), presenting in 60% (3/5) toxicity, being 2/3 in the first 15 days and 1/3 in the following 15-30 days. A patient continues with everolimus at present. The most frequently reported toxicity is as mucositis in 60% (2/3 grade 3, 1/3 degree 2) that requires dose delay in all of them and dose reduction to 5 mg in 2/3. The second most frequent toxicity was pneumonitis (2/5 = 40% grade 1 and 2 respectively). All patients received mouthwash with dexamethasone prior to the onset of everolimus. As a hematological toxicity, only grade 1 plaquetopenia stands out in 20%. The maximum response was in the form of stability in 3/5 (60%), no partial or complete reduction, while progression was in 2/5 (40%) at the first reevaluation test [1,2].","PeriodicalId":93074,"journal":{"name":"Annals of reviews and research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of reviews and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/arr.2018.03.555625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

100% of the patients are <65 years old (1 premenopausal, on treatment with gnRH analogue), with an ECOG 0-1 in 100%. 40% started as a metastatic disease. Disease-free interval was greater than 2 years in 100% of the patients.20% present 3 or more metastatic locations, while the remaining 80% present between 1-2 locations. 100% have visceral involvement. The indication of everolimus in the 5 patients was as much in 1st line as in 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th line. The patient who received everolimus in the first line was due to progression to aromatase inhibitor during the adjuvant setting. Regarding the treatments previously received, 60% were treated with fulvestrant, while also 60% had previously received chemotherapy for metastatic disease. 80% were on exemestane in combination with everolimus, while 20% combined it with letrozole. The starting dose of everolimus was 10 mg in all patients. The median time on everolimus was 7.5 months (2-14), presenting in 60% (3/5) toxicity, being 2/3 in the first 15 days and 1/3 in the following 15-30 days. A patient continues with everolimus at present. The most frequently reported toxicity is as mucositis in 60% (2/3 grade 3, 1/3 degree 2) that requires dose delay in all of them and dose reduction to 5 mg in 2/3. The second most frequent toxicity was pneumonitis (2/5 = 40% grade 1 and 2 respectively). All patients received mouthwash with dexamethasone prior to the onset of everolimus. As a hematological toxicity, only grade 1 plaquetopenia stands out in 20%. The maximum response was in the form of stability in 3/5 (60%), no partial or complete reduction, while progression was in 2/5 (40%) at the first reevaluation test [1,2].
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
依维莫司临床试验之外的经验
100%的患者年龄<65岁(1例绝经前,接受gnRH类似物治疗),100%的ECOG为0-1。40%是从转移性疾病开始的。100%的患者无病间隔大于2年。20%存在3个或更多的转移部位,而其余80%存在1-2个转移部位。100%是内脏受累。依维莫司在5例患者中的适应症1线与2、3、4、5线相同。在一线接受依维莫司的患者是由于在辅助治疗期间进展为芳香化酶抑制剂。对于先前接受的治疗,60%的患者接受过氟维司汀治疗,而60%的患者先前接受过转移性疾病的化疗。依西美坦联合依维莫司占80%,来曲唑占20%。所有患者依维莫司起始剂量均为10mg。依维莫司治疗的中位时间为7.5个月(2-14),毒性为60%(3/5),前15天毒性为2/3,后15-30天毒性为1/3。1例患者目前继续使用依维莫司。最常见的毒性报告是60%(2/3级3,1 /3度2)的粘膜炎,所有这些都需要延迟剂量,2/3的剂量减少到5mg。第二常见的毒性是肺炎(2/5 = 40%,分别为1级和2级)。所有患者在使用依维莫司前均使用地塞米松漱口水。作为血液学毒性,只有1级血小板减少症占20%。在第一次再评估测试中,最大反应为3/5的稳定性(60%),没有部分或完全复位,而进展为2/5(40%)[1,2]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Carcinoid Syndrome: Overview and Clinical Approach Bio Actives from Albizia Lebbeck on Acute Lung Injury/ Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Molecular Targets: In-Silico Study "Protecting the Frontline: An Assessment on the Occupational Factors Contributing to Covid-19 Nosocomial Infections at Levy Mwanawasa University Teaching Hospital, Zambia" "A Phytonutrient Based Brain Activation Complex and Short-Term Brain Function Changes: An Initial Investigation" Professional Development Needs in a Virtual Teaching and Learning Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1