Reproduction of Communicative Negativity Through Instrumental Irrationality

IF 0.5 Q4 COMMUNICATION Tripodos Pub Date : 2021-02-05 DOI:10.51698/TRIPODOS.2020.47P69-86
Uğur Baloğlu
{"title":"Reproduction of Communicative Negativity Through Instrumental Irrationality","authors":"Uğur Baloğlu","doi":"10.51698/TRIPODOS.2020.47P69-86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to use Turkey as an ex­ample of how the erosion occurring in social communication practices is repro­duced in the era of paradoxical experi­ences, particularly in global crisis envi­ronments where risk intensity increases. Recently, ‘the great incarceration’ situa­tion around the world has forced people to receive news and connect to them via digital platforms. The isolation of social relations for an indefinite period, espe­cially in risk society, causes people to feel constantly under pressure from an un­foreseen/indeterminate threat. The in­crease in the level of anxiety of the indi­vidual under pressure, internalizing fear after a while, turns him/herself into the very mechanism that produces anxiety and fear. This mechanism causes society to become paralyzed as a result of in­creased information pollution and the amount of information during global crisis periods. The paper examines how the negativity in communication has been exploited through the media with crises in different institutional areas —political, economic, and social— re­cently, in the framework of the terms of risk and trust used by Giddens and Beck’s risk society theory. From this point on, the paper focuses on the con­sequences of the mutual relationship between global crisis, fear culture and the new modern period. Keywords: COVID-19, global crisis, info­demic, risk society, sociology of commu­nication, media.","PeriodicalId":44263,"journal":{"name":"Tripodos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tripodos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51698/TRIPODOS.2020.47P69-86","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to use Turkey as an ex­ample of how the erosion occurring in social communication practices is repro­duced in the era of paradoxical experi­ences, particularly in global crisis envi­ronments where risk intensity increases. Recently, ‘the great incarceration’ situa­tion around the world has forced people to receive news and connect to them via digital platforms. The isolation of social relations for an indefinite period, espe­cially in risk society, causes people to feel constantly under pressure from an un­foreseen/indeterminate threat. The in­crease in the level of anxiety of the indi­vidual under pressure, internalizing fear after a while, turns him/herself into the very mechanism that produces anxiety and fear. This mechanism causes society to become paralyzed as a result of in­creased information pollution and the amount of information during global crisis periods. The paper examines how the negativity in communication has been exploited through the media with crises in different institutional areas —political, economic, and social— re­cently, in the framework of the terms of risk and trust used by Giddens and Beck’s risk society theory. From this point on, the paper focuses on the con­sequences of the mutual relationship between global crisis, fear culture and the new modern period. Keywords: COVID-19, global crisis, info­demic, risk society, sociology of commu­nication, media.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
交际否定性的工具非理性再现
本文旨在以土耳其为例,说明在矛盾经历的时代,特别是在风险强度增加的全球危机环境中,社会沟通实践中发生的侵蚀是如何被重新产生的。最近,世界各地的“大监禁”迫使人们通过数字平台接收新闻并与之联系。社会关系的无限期孤立,尤其是在风险社会中,会导致人们不断感到来自不可预见/不确定威胁的压力。压力下个体焦虑程度的增加,一段时间后将恐惧内化,使他/她自己成为产生焦虑和恐惧的机制。在全球危机时期,由于信息污染和信息量的增加,这种机制导致社会瘫痪。本文在Giddens和Beck的风险社会理论所使用的风险和信任术语的框架内,研究了传播中的消极性是如何通过媒体在政治、经济和社会等不同制度领域的危机中被利用的。从这一点出发,本文着重探讨了全球危机、恐惧文化与新现代的相互关系。关键词:新冠肺炎,全球危机,信息学,风险社会,通信社会学,媒体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tripodos
Tripodos COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence in the Social Science Area: Systematic Literature Review in Web of Science and Scopus The Influence of AI in the Media Work Force: How Companies Use an Array of Legal Remedies AI Implementation Strategies in the Spanish Press Media: Organizational Dynamics, Application Flows, Uses and Future Trends The Presence and Promotion of Foods and Beverages in the YouTube Channels of The World’s Most Influential Kid Ps: A Comparative Study Between the United States and Spain influence of personal space occupation and on the consumer’s psychological status and effective communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1