The role of secondary school teachers in shaping a political culture of ethnicity and ethnic favouritism: the case of Kenya

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Journal of Modern African Studies Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1017/S0022278X22000362
L. Kuppens, A. Langer
{"title":"The role of secondary school teachers in shaping a political culture of ethnicity and ethnic favouritism: the case of Kenya","authors":"L. Kuppens, A. Langer","doi":"10.1017/S0022278X22000362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Since Kenya's independence in 1963, ethnicity has been an important factor in Kenyan politics and everyday life. While recent research has shown that ethnic favouritism impacted the allocation of educational resources in the past, so far, no systematic research has been conducted on how teachers exacerbate, mitigate or countervail the political culture of ethnicity and ethnic favouritism. As agents of socialisation, teachers’ attitudes and behaviour can, consciously or unconsciously, convey the message that ethnic favouritism is normal and socially acceptable, or conversely delegitimise such practices. Based on a list experiment among 894 secondary school teachers in the county of Nairobi, we find that at least 25% of teachers have already favoured coethnic pupils. Interviews indicate that such favours are seldom blatant in nature and mainly serve to show solidarity with one's kin. Still, even small – frequently well-intentioned – favours may damage inter-group attitudes, trust and relations, and may even contribute to the persistence of ethnic politics.","PeriodicalId":47608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern African Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X22000362","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Since Kenya's independence in 1963, ethnicity has been an important factor in Kenyan politics and everyday life. While recent research has shown that ethnic favouritism impacted the allocation of educational resources in the past, so far, no systematic research has been conducted on how teachers exacerbate, mitigate or countervail the political culture of ethnicity and ethnic favouritism. As agents of socialisation, teachers’ attitudes and behaviour can, consciously or unconsciously, convey the message that ethnic favouritism is normal and socially acceptable, or conversely delegitimise such practices. Based on a list experiment among 894 secondary school teachers in the county of Nairobi, we find that at least 25% of teachers have already favoured coethnic pupils. Interviews indicate that such favours are seldom blatant in nature and mainly serve to show solidarity with one's kin. Still, even small – frequently well-intentioned – favours may damage inter-group attitudes, trust and relations, and may even contribute to the persistence of ethnic politics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中学教师在形成族裔和族裔偏袒的政治文化方面的作用:以肯尼亚为例
摘要自1963年肯尼亚独立以来,种族一直是肯尼亚政治和日常生活中的一个重要因素。尽管最近的研究表明,种族偏袒在过去影响了教育资源的分配,但到目前为止,还没有对教师如何加剧、减轻或抵消种族和种族偏袒的政治文化进行系统的研究。作为社会化的推动者,教师的态度和行为可以有意识或无意识地传达这样一个信息,即种族偏袒是正常的,是社会可以接受的,或者反过来使这种做法失去合法性。根据对内罗毕县894名中学教师的一项列表实验,我们发现至少25%的教师已经倾向于男女同校的学生。采访表明,这种偏袒很少是明目张胆的,主要是为了表示与亲人的团结。尽管如此,即使是善意的小偏袒也可能损害群体间的态度、信任和关系,甚至可能导致种族政治的持续存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Modern African Studies offers a quarterly survey of developments in modern African politics and society. Its main emphasis is on current issues in African politics, economies, societies and international relations. It is intended not only for students and academic specialists, but also for general readers and practitioners with a concern for modern Africa, living and working both inside and outside the continent. Editorial policy avoids commitment to any political viewpoint or ideology, but aims at a fair examination of controversial issues in order to promote a deeper understanding of what is happening in Africa today. The journal also includes an invaluable book review section.
期刊最新文献
Externalising migration control in Niger: the humanitarian–security nexus and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) Judge, landlord, broker, watchman: assessing variation in chiefly duties and authority in the Ghana–Togo Borderlands Political trust and informal traders in African cities Somalia's evolving political market place: from famine and humanitarian crisis to permanent precarity Political party ideology in Zambia: comparing the PF and the UPND on social welfare policies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1