Real movement or systematic errors? – TLS-based deformation analysis of a concrete wall

IF 1.2 Q4 REMOTE SENSING Journal of Applied Geodesy Pub Date : 2023-02-17 DOI:10.1515/jag-2022-0041
Berit Jost, Daniel Coopmann, C. Holst, H. Kuhlmann
{"title":"Real movement or systematic errors? – TLS-based deformation analysis of a concrete wall","authors":"Berit Jost, Daniel Coopmann, C. Holst, H. Kuhlmann","doi":"10.1515/jag-2022-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Performing deformation analyses with high accuracy demands using terrestrial laser scanners is very challenging due to insufficient knowledge about the error budget and correlations. Terrestrial laser scans suffer from random and systematic errors that degrade the quality of the point cloud. Even though the vast majority of systematic errors can be calibrated, remaining errors or errors that vary with time or temperature influence spatially neighboring points in the same way. Hence, correlations between the measurements exist. Considering area-based deformation analyses, these correlations have two effects: On the one hand, they reduce the effective number of measurements in the point cloud, which mainly influences the decision of whether the movement is significant or not. On the other hand, correlations caused by systematic errors in the scanner can lead to a misinterpretation as a deformation of the object. Within this study, we analyze the deformation of a concrete wall (9.50 m height, 50 m width), and we develop a workflow that avoids the misinterpretation of correlated measurements as deformations of the object. Therefore, we first calibrate the scanner to reduce the influence of systematic errors. Afterwards, we use the average of two-face measurements from several scanner stations to eliminate remaining systematic errors and correlated measurements. This study demonstrates that systematic effects can lead to errors of a few millimeters that are likely to be interpreted as small deformations, and it provides a strategy to avoid misinterpretation. Hence, it is inevitable either to model or to eliminate systematic errors of the scanner while performing a precise deformation analysis with a magnitude of a few millimeters.","PeriodicalId":45494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Geodesy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2022-0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Performing deformation analyses with high accuracy demands using terrestrial laser scanners is very challenging due to insufficient knowledge about the error budget and correlations. Terrestrial laser scans suffer from random and systematic errors that degrade the quality of the point cloud. Even though the vast majority of systematic errors can be calibrated, remaining errors or errors that vary with time or temperature influence spatially neighboring points in the same way. Hence, correlations between the measurements exist. Considering area-based deformation analyses, these correlations have two effects: On the one hand, they reduce the effective number of measurements in the point cloud, which mainly influences the decision of whether the movement is significant or not. On the other hand, correlations caused by systematic errors in the scanner can lead to a misinterpretation as a deformation of the object. Within this study, we analyze the deformation of a concrete wall (9.50 m height, 50 m width), and we develop a workflow that avoids the misinterpretation of correlated measurements as deformations of the object. Therefore, we first calibrate the scanner to reduce the influence of systematic errors. Afterwards, we use the average of two-face measurements from several scanner stations to eliminate remaining systematic errors and correlated measurements. This study demonstrates that systematic effects can lead to errors of a few millimeters that are likely to be interpreted as small deformations, and it provides a strategy to avoid misinterpretation. Hence, it is inevitable either to model or to eliminate systematic errors of the scanner while performing a precise deformation analysis with a magnitude of a few millimeters.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
真正的运动还是系统错误?-基于tls的混凝土墙体变形分析
摘要由于对误差预算和相关性的了解不足,使用地面激光扫描仪进行高精度的变形分析非常具有挑战性。地面激光扫描会受到随机和系统误差的影响,从而降低点云的质量。即使绝大多数系统误差可以校准,剩余的误差或随时间或温度变化的误差也会以相同的方式影响空间上的相邻点。因此,测量值之间存在相关性。考虑到基于区域的变形分析,这些相关性有两个影响:一方面,它们减少了点云中的有效测量次数,这主要影响运动是否显著的决定。另一方面,由扫描仪中的系统误差引起的相关性可能导致将其误解为物体的变形。在这项研究中,我们分析了混凝土墙(9.50 m高,50 m宽)的变形,并制定了一个工作流程,避免将相关测量误解为物体的变形。因此,我们首先对扫描仪进行校准,以减少系统误差的影响。然后,我们使用来自几个扫描站的两个面部测量的平均值来消除剩余的系统误差和相关测量。这项研究表明,系统效应可能导致几毫米的误差,这些误差可能被解释为小变形,并提供了一种避免误解的策略。因此,在进行几毫米量级的精确变形分析时,不可避免地要建模或消除扫描仪的系统误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Geodesy
Journal of Applied Geodesy REMOTE SENSING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Occurrence characteristics of ionospheric scintillations in the civilian GPS signals (L1, L2, and L5) through a dedicated scintillation monitoring receiver at a low-latitude location in India during the 25th solar cycle A new challenge for cadastral surveying in Taiwan: feasibility analysis using combination on CORS data and online PPP service Monitoring of a rockfill embankment dam using TLS and sUAS point clouds Analyzing recent deformation in Wadi Hagul, Eastern Desert, Egypt, via advanced remote sensing and geodetic data processing Regional evaluation of global geopotential models and three types of digital elevation models with ground-based gravity and GNSS/levelling data using several techniques over Sudan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1